DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Nicolas Pernas Maradei <nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/21] net/pcap: create own configuration parameter
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:22:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469121780-26099-2-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469121780-26099-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

pcap pmd is using ring pmd configuration parameters to set max number of
queues. This creates an unnecessary dependency and confusion.

Create a new config parameter for pcap PMD:
CONFIG_RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES

Default value of config is same as ring parameter default.

pcap pmd doesn't need to be configured in a detail to set rx and tx max
queue numbers separately, so using same config item for both queues.

Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
 config/common_base              |  1 +
 drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/config/common_base b/config/common_base
index 7830535..e32bd61 100644
--- a/config/common_base
+++ b/config/common_base
@@ -307,6 +307,7 @@ CONFIG_RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_TX_RINGS=16
 # Compile software PMD backed by PCAP files
 #
 CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP=n
+CONFIG_RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES=16
 
 #
 # Compile link bonding PMD library
diff --git a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c b/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
index 7e213eb..6343c0e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c
@@ -87,22 +87,22 @@ struct pcap_tx_queue {
 
 struct rx_pcaps {
 	unsigned num_of_rx;
-	pcap_t *pcaps[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
-	const char *names[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
-	const char *types[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
+	pcap_t *pcaps[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	const char *names[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	const char *types[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
 };
 
 struct tx_pcaps {
 	unsigned num_of_tx;
-	pcap_dumper_t *dumpers[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_TX_RINGS];
-	pcap_t *pcaps[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
-	const char *names[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
-	const char *types[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
+	pcap_dumper_t *dumpers[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	pcap_t *pcaps[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	const char *names[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	const char *types[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
 };
 
 struct pmd_internals {
-	struct pcap_rx_queue rx_queue[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
-	struct pcap_tx_queue tx_queue[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_TX_RINGS];
+	struct pcap_rx_queue rx_queue[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
+	struct pcap_tx_queue tx_queue[RTE_PMD_PCAP_MAX_QUEUES];
 	int if_index;
 	int single_iface;
 };
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-21 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-21 17:22 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/21] pcap pmd improvements Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/21] net/pcap: use macros for param string Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 03/21] net/pcap: reorganize private structs Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 04/21] net/pcap: add checks for max queue number Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 05/21] net/pcap: update function to reuse it Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 06/21] net/pcap: don't carry numa_node argument Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/21] net/pcap: don't carry kvlist argument Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/21] net/pcap: move comment to correct place Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/21] net/pcap: remove duplicated max queue number check Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 10/21] net/pcap: use single_iface variable instead of hardcoded Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 11/21] net/pcap: group stats related fields into a struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 12/21] net/pcap: make const array static Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 13/21] net/pcap: reorder header files Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 14/21] net/pcap: reorder functions Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 15/21] net/pcap: update how single iface handled Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 16/21] net/pcap: remove unnecessary check Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 17/21] net/pcap: remove redundant assignment Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 18/21] net/pcap: simplify function Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 19/21] net/pcap: fix missing tx iface assignment Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 20/21] net/pcap: coding convention updates Ferruh Yigit
2016-07-21 17:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 21/21] net/pcap: remove rte prefix from static functions Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469121780-26099-2-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).