DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: helin.zhang@intel.com, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/i40e: fix unsafe tailq element removal
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:02:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469196122-168989-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469196122-168989-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

i40e driver was removing elements when iterating tailq lists
with TAILQ_FOREACH macro, which is not safe.
Instead, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE macro is used when removing/freeing
these elements.

Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver")
Fixes: 440499cf5376 ("net/i40e: support floating VEB")

Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
index 84c86aa..11a5804 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
  *   OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
  */
 
-#include <sys/queue.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
@@ -51,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <rte_alarm.h>
 #include <rte_dev.h>
 #include <rte_eth_ctrl.h>
+#include <rte_tailq.h>
 
 #include "i40e_logs.h"
 #include "base/i40e_prototype.h"
@@ -4094,6 +4094,7 @@ i40e_vsi_release(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 	struct i40e_pf *pf;
 	struct i40e_hw *hw;
 	struct i40e_vsi_list *vsi_list;
+	void *temp;
 	int ret;
 	struct i40e_mac_filter *f;
 	uint16_t user_param = vsi->user_param;
@@ -4106,7 +4107,7 @@ i40e_vsi_release(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 
 	/* VSI has child to attach, release child first */
 	if (vsi->veb) {
-		TAILQ_FOREACH(vsi_list, &vsi->veb->head, list) {
+		TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(vsi_list, &vsi->veb->head, list, temp) {
 			if (i40e_vsi_release(vsi_list->vsi) != I40E_SUCCESS)
 				return -1;
 			TAILQ_REMOVE(&vsi->veb->head, vsi_list, list);
@@ -4115,7 +4116,7 @@ i40e_vsi_release(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 	}
 
 	if (vsi->floating_veb) {
-		TAILQ_FOREACH(vsi_list, &vsi->floating_veb->head, list) {
+		TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(vsi_list, &vsi->floating_veb->head, list, temp) {
 			if (i40e_vsi_release(vsi_list->vsi) != I40E_SUCCESS)
 				return -1;
 			TAILQ_REMOVE(&vsi->floating_veb->head, vsi_list, list);
@@ -4124,7 +4125,7 @@ i40e_vsi_release(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 
 	/* Remove all macvlan filters of the VSI */
 	i40e_vsi_remove_all_macvlan_filter(vsi);
-	TAILQ_FOREACH(f, &vsi->mac_list, next)
+	TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(f, &vsi->mac_list, next, temp)
 		rte_free(f);
 
 	if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_MAIN &&
@@ -4682,6 +4683,7 @@ i40e_vsi_config_vlan_filter(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, bool on)
 {
 	int i, num;
 	struct i40e_mac_filter *f;
+	void *temp;
 	struct i40e_mac_filter_info *mac_filter;
 	enum rte_mac_filter_type desired_filter;
 	int ret = I40E_SUCCESS;
@@ -4706,7 +4708,7 @@ i40e_vsi_config_vlan_filter(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, bool on)
 	i = 0;
 
 	/* Remove all existing mac */
-	TAILQ_FOREACH(f, &vsi->mac_list, next) {
+	TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(f, &vsi->mac_list, next, temp) {
 		mac_filter[i] = f->mac_info;
 		ret = i40e_vsi_delete_mac(vsi, &f->mac_info.mac_addr);
 		if (ret) {
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-22 13:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Safe tailq element removal in i40e driver Pablo de Lara
2016-07-22 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: add tailq safe iterator macro Pablo de Lara
2016-07-22 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/i40e: avoid unsafe tailq element removal Pablo de Lara
2016-07-22 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Safe tailq element removal in i40e driver Pablo de Lara
2016-07-22 14:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: add tailq safe iterator macro Pablo de Lara
2016-07-22 14:02   ` Pablo de Lara [this message]
2016-07-22 14:56     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/i40e: fix unsafe tailq element removal Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-22 16:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Safe tailq element removal in i40e driver Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469196122-168989-3-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).