From: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jing.d.chen@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:27:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473125252-32201-3-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473125252-32201-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Add CKSUM_GOOD flag to distinguish a good checksum from an unknown one.
Since vector Rx supports checksum offload, this patch removes the
hw_ip_checksum check in fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check().
Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c | 4 ++++
drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
index bf5888b..32cc7ff 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c
@@ -101,11 +101,15 @@ rx_desc_to_ol_flags(struct rte_mbuf *m, const union fm10k_rx_desc *d)
(FM10K_RXD_STATUS_IPCS | FM10K_RXD_STATUS_IPE)) ==
(FM10K_RXD_STATUS_IPCS | FM10K_RXD_STATUS_IPE)))
m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD;
+ else
+ m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD;
if (unlikely((d->d.staterr &
(FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4CS | FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4E)) ==
(FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4CS | FM10K_RXD_STATUS_L4E)))
m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD;
+ else
+ m->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD;
}
uint16_t
diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
index 9ea747e..5513f86 100644
--- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ fm10k_reset_tx_queue(struct fm10k_tx_queue *txq);
#define RXEFLAG_SHIFT (13)
/* IPE/L4E flag shift */
#define L3L4EFLAG_SHIFT (14)
+/* shift PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD into one byte by 1 bit */
+#define CKSUM_SHIFT (1)
static inline void
fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
@@ -92,11 +94,18 @@ fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
0x0001, 0x0001, 0x0001, 0x0001);
+ /* mask the lower byte of ol_flags */
+ const __m128i ol_flags_msk = _mm_set_epi16(
+ 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
+ 0x00FF, 0x00FF, 0x00FF, 0x00FF);
+
const __m128i l3l4cksum_flag = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0,
- PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
- PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD, PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD, 0);
+ (PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >> CKSUM_SHIFT,
+ (PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD) >> CKSUM_SHIFT,
+ (PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >> CKSUM_SHIFT,
+ (PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD) >> CKSUM_SHIFT);
const __m128i rxe_flag = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0,
@@ -139,6 +148,10 @@ fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
/* Process L4/L3 checksum error flags */
cksumflag = _mm_srli_epi16(cksumflag, L3L4EFLAG_SHIFT);
cksumflag = _mm_shuffle_epi8(l3l4cksum_flag, cksumflag);
+
+ /* clean the higher byte and shift back the flag bits */
+ cksumflag = _mm_and_si128(cksumflag, ol_flags_msk);
+ cksumflag = _mm_slli_epi16(cksumflag, CKSUM_SHIFT);
vtag1 = _mm_or_si128(cksumflag, vtag1);
vol.dword = _mm_cvtsi128_si64(vtag1);
@@ -234,11 +247,8 @@ fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
if (fconf->mode != RTE_FDIR_MODE_NONE)
return -1;
- /* - no csum error report support
- * - no header split support
- */
- if (rxmode->hw_ip_checksum == 1 ||
- rxmode->header_split == 1)
+ /* no header split support */
+ if (rxmode->header_split == 1)
return -1;
return 0;
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 1:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: fix Rx checksum flags Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` Xiao Wang [this message]
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/e1000: implement new Rx checksum flag Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/i40e: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-14 5:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Chen, Jing D
2016-10-13 23:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473125252-32201-3-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--to=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).