From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6766904 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 01:21:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142B32878C; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:21:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:21:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=WUpAtV+OAdzFtqnKfaqfffu0Xlo/91kWkJSM+bbUBBs=; b=g/8mif4niRVE oMx9bTfNT6iq3oSONDQupJjWVhz6fgbyRvhAhbG/VOF4wA0r2k8OaL3oYEXKfzh0 kwnvKqh+m5rwc0XpjGubxtsZy27uFewHWQMXj3kjksnr4TyLy7oHAprDZsP0lhHv ym6qOiWT1T5kyhYKYo/VKONtjmZ9i0U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=WUpAtV+OAdzFtqnKfaqfffu0Xlo/91kWkJSM+bbUB Bs=; b=CfH42yGeuj0FwjQNHGquDDejfLd1lPeMhZ5PYp6h5ms0kCOvukA14UzzA EAI64yQAJvrZeaKpP//Hwr0Q6Nt2TGiw0o3cLoSZNOjeyMA0ZMusq/205nBkDLN+ WxS40h8igNsiN60USxQsKV/6yBa9VrYV+EYDtFwpg2FGXblnQn7S1wSOR8gD8y8h i6LRNZ4dEI/Cvb2EaF3avc9V+5elQuyNsuK6zCU4ugZQx/wEy/9K40LwZkDljnkl fW5Kw3T0mEXRtkdFjfGKrjni0HIVg2QU9zwBgE7I5SbVwmGzsbTQVkVyfEt8fmB2 8hR88P4kNJE1VZp/v2VtW3kNoDOSg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrgedvgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfh gggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceo thhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfe drudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0149710087; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 19:21:13 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Noa Ezra Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Asaf Penso Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 01:21:12 +0100 Message-ID: <14746990.gd7JFLnMxP@xps> In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D903A68@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1547379358-17310-1-git-send-email-noae@mellanox.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258010D903A68@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples/ip_fragmentation: support big packets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:21:15 -0000 14/01/2019 13:55, Ananyev, Konstantin: > > > > In some vendors the RX and TX configuration must be the same, therefore > > the MTU size need to be equal to max_rx_pkt_len. > > The MTU is the largest size packet in bytes that can be sent on the > > network, therefore before changing this parameter, the NIC could not > > receive packets larger than 1500 bytes, which is the default MTU size. > > In addition, scatter-gather need to be enabled in order to receive > > frames bigger than mbuf size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Noa Ezra > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev Applied, thanks