[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix crash of lpm test

[Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>]

The test recently added accesses to lpm->tbl8[ip >> 8] with is much
larger than the size of the table, causing a crash of the test
application.

Fix this typo by replacing tbl8 by tbl24.

Fixes: 231fa88ed522 ("app/test: verify LPM tbl8 recycle")

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---

Hi Wei,

I don't know lpm very well and I did not spend much time to understand
the test case. I guess that's the proper fix, but please check carefully
that I'm not doing something wrong :)

Thanks,
Olivier


 app/test/test_lpm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c
index 80e0efc..41ae80f 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ test18(void)
 	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
 
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
-	tbl8_group_index = lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx;
+	tbl8_group_index = lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx;
 
 	depth = 23;
 	next_hop = 2;
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ test18(void)
 	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
 
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
-	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx);
+	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx);
 
 	depth = 24;
 	next_hop = 4;
@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ test18(void)
 	rte_lpm_add(lpm, ip, depth, next_hop);
 
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].valid_group);
-	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl8[ip>>8].group_idx);
+	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(tbl8_group_index == lpm->tbl24[ip>>8].group_idx);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
 #undef group_idx
-- 
2.8.1