From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
To: <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/12] eal/bus: add scan, match and insert support
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 18:20:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482756644-13726-4-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1482756644-13726-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
When a PMD is registred, it will associate itself with a bus.
A bus is responsible for 'scan' of all the devices attached to it.
All the scanned devices are attached to bus specific device_list.
During the probe operation, 'match' of the drivers and devices would
be done.
Also, rather than adding a device to tail, a new device might be added to
the list (pivoted on bus) at a predefined position, for example, adding it
in order of addressing. Support for this is added as '*bus_insert'.
This patch also adds necessary test framework to test the scan and
match callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
---
app/test/test_bus.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c | 15 ++
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h | 64 ++++++++
3 files changed, 344 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_bus.c b/app/test/test_bus.c
index 60950d3..98250c8 100644
--- a/app/test/test_bus.c
+++ b/app/test/test_bus.c
@@ -80,12 +80,32 @@ struct dummy_bus {
struct rte_bus_list orig_bus_list =
TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(orig_bus_list);
+/* Forward declarations for callbacks from bus */
+
+/* Bus A
+ * Scan would register devA1 and devA2 to bus
+ */
+int scan_fn_for_busA(struct rte_bus *bus);
+
+/* Bus B
+ * Scan would register devB1 and devB2 to bus
+ */
+int scan_fn_for_busB(struct rte_bus *bus);
+
+/* generic implementations wrapped around by above declarations */
+static int generic_scan_fn(struct rte_bus *bus);
+static int generic_match_fn(struct rte_driver *drv, struct rte_device *dev);
+
struct rte_bus busA = {
.name = "busA", /* "busA" */
+ .scan = scan_fn_for_busA,
+ .match = generic_match_fn,
};
struct rte_bus busB = {
.name = "busB", /* "busB */
+ .scan = scan_fn_for_busB,
+ .match = generic_match_fn,
};
struct rte_driver driverA = {
@@ -184,6 +204,92 @@ dump_device_tree(void)
printf("------>8-------\n");
}
+/* @internal
+ * Move over the dummy_buses and find the entry matching the bus object
+ * passed as argument.
+ * For each device in that dummy_buses list, register.
+ *
+ * @param bus
+ * bus to scan againt test entry
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful scan, even if no devices are found
+ * !0 for any error in scanning (like, invalid bus)
+ */
+static int
+generic_scan_fn(struct rte_bus *bus)
+{
+ int i = 0;
+ struct rte_device *dev = NULL;
+ struct dummy_bus *db = NULL;
+
+ if (!bus)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* Extract the device tree node using the bus passed */
+ for (i = 0; dummy_buses[i].name; i++) {
+ if (!strcmp(dummy_buses[i].name, bus->name)) {
+ db = &dummy_buses[i];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!db)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* For all the devices in the device tree (dummy_buses), add device */
+ for (i = 0; db->devices[i]; i++) {
+ dev = &(db->devices[i]->dev);
+ rte_eal_bus_add_device(bus, dev);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* @internal
+ * Obtain bus from driver object. Match the address of rte_device object
+ * with all the devices associated with that bus.
+ *
+ * Being a test function, all this does is validate that device object
+ * provided is available on the same bus to which driver is registered.
+ *
+ * @param drv
+ * driver to which matching is to be performed
+ * @param dev
+ * device object to match with driver
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful match
+ * !0 for failed match
+ */
+static int
+generic_match_fn(struct rte_driver *drv, struct rte_device *dev)
+{
+ struct rte_bus *bus;
+ struct rte_device *dev_p = NULL;
+
+ /* Match is based entirely on address of 'dev' and 'dev_p' extracted
+ * from bus->device_list.
+ */
+
+ /* a driver is registered with the bus *before* the scan. */
+ bus = drv->bus;
+ TAILQ_FOREACH(dev_p, &bus->device_list, next) {
+ if (dev == dev_p)
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+int
+scan_fn_for_busA(struct rte_bus *bus) {
+ return generic_scan_fn(bus);
+}
+
+int
+scan_fn_for_busB(struct rte_bus *bus) {
+ return generic_scan_fn(bus);
+}
+
static int
test_bus_setup(void)
{
@@ -392,6 +498,155 @@ test_driver_unregistration_on_bus(void)
}
+static int
+test_device_unregistration_on_bus(void)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct rte_bus *bus = NULL;
+ struct rte_device *dev;
+
+ for (i = 0; dummy_buses[i].name; i++) {
+ bus = rte_eal_bus_get(dummy_buses[i].name);
+ if (!bus) {
+ printf("Unable to find bus (%s)\n",
+ dummy_buses[i].name);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ /* For bus 'bus', unregister all devices */
+ TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, &bus->device_list, next) {
+ rte_eal_bus_remove_device(dev);
+ }
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; dummy_buses[i].name; i++) {
+ bus = rte_eal_bus_get(dummy_buses[i].name);
+
+ if (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&bus->device_list)) {
+ printf("Unable to remove all devices on bus (%s)\n",
+ bus->name);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* All devices from all buses have been removed */
+ printf("All devices on all buses unregistered.\n");
+ dump_device_tree();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* @internal
+ * For each bus registered, call the scan function to identify devices
+ * on the bus.
+ *
+ * @param void
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful scan
+ * !0 for unsuccessful scan
+ *
+ */
+static int
+test_bus_scan(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct rte_bus *bus;
+
+ TAILQ_FOREACH(bus, &rte_bus_list, next) {
+ /* Call the scan function for each bus */
+ ret = bus->scan(bus);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("Scan of buses failed.\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("Scan of all buses completed.\n");
+ dump_device_tree();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* @internal
+ * Function to perform 'probe' and link devices and drivers on a bus.
+ * This would work over all the buses registered, and all devices and drivers
+ * registered with it - call match on each pair.
+ * Aim is to test the match_fn for each bus.
+ *
+ * @param void
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful probe
+ * !0 for failure in probe
+ *
+ */
+static int
+test_probe_on_bus(void)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ int i, j;
+ struct rte_bus *bus = NULL;
+ struct rte_device *dev = NULL;
+ struct rte_driver *drv = NULL;
+
+ /* In case of this test:
+ * 1. for each bus in rte_bus_list
+ * 2. for each device in bus->device_list
+ * 3. for each driver in bus->driver_list
+ * 4. call match
+ * 5. link driver and device
+ * 6. Verify the linkage.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; dummy_buses[i].name; i++) {
+ /* get bus pointer from dummy_buses itself rather than
+ * rte_eal_bus_get
+ */
+ bus = dummy_buses[i].bus;
+
+ TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, &bus->device_list, next) {
+ TAILQ_FOREACH(drv, &bus->driver_list, next) {
+ if (!bus->match) {
+ printf("Incorrect bus without match "
+ "fn: (%s).\n", bus->name);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ ret = bus->match(drv, dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ printf("Device and driver don't "
+ "belong to same bus.\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ dev->driver = drv;
+
+ /* As match is generic, it always results in
+ * dev->drv pointing to first driver entry in
+ * dummy_buses[i]
+ */
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Verify the linkage. All devices belonging to a dummy_buses[i]
+ * should have same driver (first driver entry of dummy_buses[i])
+ */
+ for (i = 0; dummy_buses[i].name; i++) {
+ drv = dummy_buses[i].drivers[0];
+
+ for (j = 0; dummy_buses[i].devices[j]; j++) {
+ dev = &(dummy_buses[i].devices[j]->dev);
+ if (dev->driver != drv) {
+ printf("Incorrect driver<->device linkage.\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("Probe on all buses successful.\n");
+ dump_device_tree();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int
test_bus(void)
{
@@ -408,6 +663,16 @@ test_bus(void)
if (test_driver_registration_on_bus())
return -1;
+ if (test_bus_scan())
+ return -1;
+
+ /* Now that the devices and drivers are registered, perform probe */
+ if (test_probe_on_bus())
+ return -1;
+
+ if (test_device_unregistration_on_bus())
+ return -1;
+
if (test_driver_unregistration_on_bus())
return -1;
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
index 01730f8..5a5ae75 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_bus.c
@@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ rte_eal_bus_add_device(struct rte_bus *bus, struct rte_device *dev)
dev->bus = bus;
}
+void
+rte_eal_bus_insert_device(struct rte_bus *bus, struct rte_device *old_dev,
+ struct rte_device *new_dev)
+{
+ RTE_VERIFY(bus);
+ RTE_VERIFY(old_dev);
+ RTE_VERIFY(new_dev);
+
+ TAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(old_dev, new_dev, next);
+ new_dev->bus = bus;
+}
+
/** @internal
* Remove a device from its bus.
*/
@@ -130,6 +142,9 @@ rte_eal_bus_register(struct rte_bus *bus)
{
RTE_VERIFY(bus);
RTE_VERIFY(bus->name && strlen(bus->name));
+ /* A bus should mandatorily have the scan and match implemented */
+ RTE_VERIFY(bus->scan);
+ RTE_VERIFY(bus->match);
/* Initialize the driver and device list associated with the bus */
TAILQ_INIT(&(bus->driver_list));
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
index ad2873c..da76db3 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h
@@ -60,6 +60,49 @@ TAILQ_HEAD(rte_bus_list, rte_bus);
extern struct rte_bus_list rte_bus_list;
/**
+ * Bus specific scan for devices attached on the bus.
+ * For each bus object, the scan would be reponsible for finding devices and
+ * adding them to its private device list.
+ *
+ * Successful detection of a device results in rte_device object which is
+ * embedded within the respective device type (rte_pci_device, for example).
+ * Thereafter, PCI specific bus would need to perform
+ * container_of(rte_pci_device) to obtain PCI device object.
+ *
+ * Scan failure of a bus is not treated as exit criteria for application. Scan
+ * for all other buses would still continue.
+ *
+ * A bus should mandatorily implement this method.
+ *
+ * @param bus
+ * Reference to the bus on which device is added
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful scan
+ * !0 (<0) for unsuccessful scan with error value
+ */
+typedef int (*bus_scan_t)(struct rte_bus *bus);
+
+/**
+ * Bus specific match for devices and drivers which can service them.
+ * For each scanned device, rte_driver->probe would be called for driver
+ * specific initialization of the device.
+ *
+ * It is the work of each bus handler to obtain the specific device object
+ * using container_of (or typecasting, as a less preferred way).
+ *
+ * A bus should mandatorily implement this method.
+ *
+ * @param drv
+ * Driver object attached to the bus
+ * @param dev
+ * Device object which is being probed.
+ * @return
+ * 0 for successful match
+ * !0 for unsuccessful match
+ */
+typedef int (*bus_match_t)(struct rte_driver *drv, struct rte_device *dev);
+
+/**
* A structure describing a generic bus.
*/
struct rte_bus {
@@ -69,6 +112,9 @@ struct rte_bus {
struct rte_device_list device_list;
/**< List of all devices on bus */
const char *name; /**< Name of the bus */
+ bus_scan_t scan; /**< Scan for devices attached to bus */
+ bus_match_t match;
+ /**< Match device with drivers associated with the bus */
};
/** @internal
@@ -85,6 +131,24 @@ void
rte_eal_bus_add_device(struct rte_bus *bus, struct rte_device *dev);
/** @internal
+ * Rather than adding a device to tail, insert at a predefined location.
+ * This is specifically useful for update device cases, or where addition
+ * of devices in the list needs to be ordered (addressing, for example).
+ *
+ * @param bus
+ * Handle for bus on which device is to be added
+ * @param old_dev
+ * Existing rte_device object before which new device needs to be added
+ * @param new_dev
+ * Object for device to be added before old_dev
+ * @return
+ * void
+ */
+void
+rte_eal_bus_insert_device(struct rte_bus *bus, struct rte_device *old_device,
+ struct rte_device *new_device);
+
+/** @internal
* Remove a device from its bus.
*
* @param dev
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-26 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-04 10:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/13] eal: define container_of macro Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/13] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/13] test: add basic bus infrastructure tests Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] eal/bus: add scan and match support Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/13] eal/bus: add support for inserting a device on a bus Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/13] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] pci: replace probe and remove handlers with rte_driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-08 17:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-09 4:59 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/13] eal: enable probe and remove from bus infrastructure Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-06 10:45 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/13] pci: split match and probe function Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/13] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI scan/match towards RTE device/driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/13] pci: Pass rte_pci_addr to functions instead of separate args Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/13] eal: enable PCI bus Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-04 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/13] eal/pci: remove PCI probe and init calls Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-06 20:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model David Marchand
2016-12-07 9:55 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-07 12:17 ` David Marchand
2016-12-07 13:10 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-07 13:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-08 5:04 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-08 7:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-08 7:53 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-12 14:35 ` Jianbo Liu
2016-12-13 6:56 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] " Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/12] eal: define container_of macro Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 22:24 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-14 5:12 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 8:14 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-16 9:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-12-16 10:47 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-16 11:21 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-12-16 11:54 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/12] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/12] test: add basic bus infrastructure tests Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/12] eal/bus: add scan, match and insert support Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/12] eal: add probe and remove support for rte_driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/12] eal: enable probe from bus infrastructure Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/12] pci: split match and probe function Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/12] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI scan/match towards RTE device/driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/12] pci: Pass rte_pci_addr to functions instead of separate args Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/12] eal: enable PCI bus Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/12] drivers: update PMDs to use rte_driver probe and remove Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-13 13:52 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2016-12-13 15:07 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-14 5:14 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-14 5:11 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-14 9:49 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-15 21:36 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-26 9:14 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/12] eal: define container_of macro Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/12] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-20 12:37 ` Hemant Agrawal
2016-12-20 13:17 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-20 13:51 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-20 17:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-21 7:11 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-21 15:38 ` Jan Blunck
2016-12-21 23:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-12-22 5:12 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-22 5:52 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-25 17:39 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/12] test: add basic bus infrastructure tests Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/12] eal/bus: add scan, match and insert support Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:25 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/12] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/12] eal: add probe and remove support for rte_driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/12] eal: enable probe from bus infrastructure Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/12] pci: split match and probe function Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/12] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI scan/match towards RTE device/driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] pci: Pass rte_pci_addr to functions instead of separate args Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/12] eal: enable PCI bus and PCI test framework Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:20 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-16 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/12] drivers: update PMDs to use rte_driver probe and remove Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/12] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/12] test: add basic bus infrastructure tests Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` Shreyansh Jain [this message]
2016-12-26 13:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/12] eal/bus: add scan, match and insert support Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/12] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/12] eal: add probe and remove support for rte_driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/12] eal: enable probe from bus infrastructure Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/12] pci: split match and probe function Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/12] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI scan/match towards RTE device/driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/12] pci: Pass rte_pci_addr to functions instead of separate args Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/12] eal: enable PCI bus and PCI test framework Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/12] drivers: update PMDs to use rte_driver probe and remove Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 12:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/12] eal/bus: add bus iteration macros Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/12] eal/bus: introduce bus abstraction Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 21:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-06 10:31 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-06 14:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-09 6:24 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-09 15:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-10 4:07 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/12] test: add basic bus infrastructure tests Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/12] eal/bus: add scan, match and insert support Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/12] eal: integrate bus scan and probe with EAL Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 21:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-06 10:38 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-06 12:00 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-06 13:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-09 6:35 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-08 12:21 ` Rosen, Rami
2017-01-09 6:34 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/12] eal: add probe and remove support for rte_driver Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 22:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-06 11:44 ` Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-06 15:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-09 6:28 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/12] eal: enable probe from bus infrastructure Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/12] pci: split match and probe function Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 22:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/12] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI scan/match towards RTE device/driver Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 22:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-06 12:03 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/12] pci: Pass rte_pci_addr to functions instead of separate args Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/12] eal: enable PCI bus and PCI test framework Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/12] drivers: update PMDs to use rte_driver probe and remove Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-09 15:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-09 16:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-10 4:09 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-12-26 13:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 12/12] eal/bus: add bus iteration macros Shreyansh Jain
2017-01-03 22:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-03 22:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/12] Introducing EAL Bus-Device-Driver Model Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-06 6:27 ` Shreyansh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1482756644-13726-4-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--to=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).