DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix x86 vPMD Rx checksum flag
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:49:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485283755-10944-1-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> (raw)

When no error reported in Rx descriptor, we should set
CKSUM_GOOD flag before return.

Fixes: 9966a00a0688 ("net/i40e: enable bad checksum flags in vector Rx")

Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c
index 7c84a41..2c4061c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c
@@ -148,6 +148,20 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
 	const __m128i rss_vlan_msk = _mm_set_epi32(
 			0x1c03804, 0x1c03804, 0x1c03804, 0x1c03804);
 
+	const __m128i cksum_mask = _mm_set_epi32(
+			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD,
+			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD,
+			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD,
+			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD |
+			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD);
+
 	/* map rss and vlan type to rss hash and vlan flag */
 	const __m128i vlan_flags = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
 			0, 0, 0, 0,
@@ -160,14 +174,17 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
 			0, 0, PKT_RX_FDIR, 0);
 
 	const __m128i l3_l4e_flags = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
-			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
-			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
-			0);
+			/* shift right 1 bit to make sure it not exceed 255 */
+			(PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD |
+			 PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD |
+			 PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
+			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD >> 1,
+			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD) >> 1);
 
 	vlan0 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[0], descs[1]);
 	vlan1 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[2], descs[3]);
@@ -181,6 +198,10 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
 
 	l3_l4e = _mm_srli_epi32(vlan1, 22);
 	l3_l4e = _mm_shuffle_epi8(l3_l4e_flags, l3_l4e);
+	/* then we shift left 1 bit */
+	l3_l4e = _mm_slli_epi32(l3_l4e, 1);
+	/* we need to mask out the reduntant bits */
+	l3_l4e = _mm_and_si128(l3_l4e, cksum_mask);
 
 	vlan0 = _mm_or_si128(vlan0, rss);
 	vlan0 = _mm_or_si128(vlan0, l3_l4e);
@@ -189,6 +210,7 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
 	rx_pkts[1]->ol_flags = _mm_extract_epi16(vlan0, 2);
 	rx_pkts[2]->ol_flags = _mm_extract_epi16(vlan0, 4);
 	rx_pkts[3]->ol_flags = _mm_extract_epi16(vlan0, 6);
+	printf("ol_flags = %lx\n", rx_pkts[0]->ol_flags);
 }
 #else
 #define desc_to_olflags_v(desc, rx_pkts) do {} while (0)
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-25  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-24 18:49 Qi Zhang [this message]
2017-01-24 19:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Qi Zhang
2017-01-25 14:00   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-25  1:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1485283755-10944-1-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).