DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: fix dequeue zero copy
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:26:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492579561-19619-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)

For zero copy mode, we need pin the mbuf to not let the underlaying PMD
driver (or the app) free the mbuf. Currently, only the heading mbuf is
pinned. However, the mbuf free function would try to free all mbufs
in the mbuf chain (-1 to the refcnt). This may lead the head mbuf being
still pinned, while the other subsequent mbufs are actually freed. Which
is wrong.

It becomes more fatal after the mbuf refactor, more specificly, after
the commit 8f094a9ac5d7 ("mbuf: set mbuf fields while in pool"). The
refcnt resets to 1 after the last real reference. OTOH, it leads to a
situtation that we never know one mbuf is actually freed or not. This
would result the mbuf __just__ after the heading mbuf being freed twice:
it's firstly freed (and put back to mempool) when the underlaying PMD
finishes the DMA.  Later, it will then be freed again when vhost unpins
it. Meaning, one mbuf may be returned to the mempool twice, while in
turn, being allocated twice later. Something uncertain may happen then.
For example, the VM2VM case becomes broken.

Fixes: b0a985d1f340 ("vhost: add dequeue zero copy")

Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
index b9f2168..d3d4424 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
@@ -871,6 +871,8 @@ static inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
 					"allocate memory for mbuf.\n");
 				return -1;
 			}
+			if (unlikely(dev->dequeue_zero_copy))
+				rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(cur, 1);
 
 			prev->next = cur;
 			prev->data_len = mbuf_offset;
-- 
1.9.0

             reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19  5:26 Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2017-04-19  8:43 ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492579561-19619-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).