From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469748E6C for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:19:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so81661004wme.0 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:19:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=IIgHaA8m3dB/0LuN4mTTXp+Z95fhMQBhelgqocwl7tE=; b=cdWouvO7qeQlTzge65QwYEirrnzQAzSpzqRrmh1uz1GUEjAbbl6qLxye3QdsdnrnFA QHbiRhk2zg8vwQM+//GUzl7u2ATORXYsW1sQwcfjqJN78Sd0I5QoKXY1zGJ37ux95CTq E2+3+DvXPxJ2jhIPrxJxfXjqCetrgUKj+0reuLhdh7mEJeRBIOHODfdcsUxZuaDTxgdr st65yR+faQYktQFtkCzAQvu1p5Q58aIx21YrqsA7SrQJZHHlRdhDaypUOIzHVj/lszZw wfS9SEMxZeFQFD409lxot5oeUkS2acPFHNeiWm5yl558Z5W+4RRukvZKgbJk0Ir743dU dLQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=IIgHaA8m3dB/0LuN4mTTXp+Z95fhMQBhelgqocwl7tE=; b=WnAhFvH64CEo/PUbToWJYe3y3zAu5Kasms96Olvncqbgwwgnpu+Z4FtsFHKVNSbLzK CpgRtlPufaVBA9elyhNGhTVNuoc7nt+Dlj7JO3cyYDbDDQL9vwzd6P897YlpVf+IErRH L6cJgcKTPjhHYppxNC5V2mBxJcqJ/d28ltSdJ4IrH3IvCRf7vtb91txMqjhx2YoTkX+M Z37y5+lpgvxPaxqFsZ6ZN5oyYEkzRiqpzLEr20pA0T4qs/NhmLHo7i+px8BcIF12T4E3 U3ZEPSx6TJ/PMg6HJpKO0qyUoxM7UbD0+QZDv0pAp8bN2PUS72Pyj5YI0raEKdWWf/Al z7RA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyRaW+KI3kjqggu7XbBIW3NQ5HLqE+EcGqo9DowSsyY7JT1UVk7M/x2Drjrt421AprjYoR X-Received: by 10.28.132.13 with SMTP id g13mr18091597wmd.35.1446549572078; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:19:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id om1sm27054052wjc.2.2015.11.03.03.19.31 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 03:19:31 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:18:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1494965.qdxxxY3pyY@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20151103102435.GD15320@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1446508048-16744-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <56388977.9030206@intel.com> <20151103102435.GD15320@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Vlastimil Kosar , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 14/15] mk: Introduce ARMv7 architecture X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:32 -0000 2015-11-03 10:24, Bruce Richardson: > The release notes "New Feature" section is always one that causes conflicts on > apply of patches. I think Thomas is ok to handle that on apply, or else we'd all > be constantly rebasing. Yes, it is a common conflict managed when applying. > For 2.3 we maybe need to come up with a new way to modify this to make applying > patches easier. For example, can the new features section just be pulled from > a set of individual single-bullet-point files inside a directory? Then each new > feature just drops its addition in a new file and there are no conflicts. Can > rst be used to pull into a doc a directory: e.g. "new_features/*.rst"? Good idea. But we should try to have some automatic sorting in the list.