DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Hall <thall@Brocade.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Guidelines for stats_get ierrors in a media driver
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:25:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494969873552.80827@Brocade.com> (raw)

I'm trying to make sense of the stats_get ierrors value. It doesn't appear that there is any consistency between any of the net drivers for what this value truly represents. For example, the ixgbe driver calculates the value as


stats->ierrors  = hw_stats->crcerrs +
                          hw_stats->mspdc +
                          hw_stats->rlec +
                          hw_stats->ruc +
                          hw_stats->roc +
                          hw_stats->illerrc +
                          hw_stats->errbc +
                          hw_stats->rfc +
                          hw_stats->fccrc +
                          hw_stats->fclast;

While the vmxnet3 driver does the following

RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS < VMXNET3_MAX_RX_QUEUES); for (i = 0; i < hw->num_rx_queues; i++) { struct UPT1_RxStats *rxStats = &hw->rqd_start[i].stats; stats->q_ipackets[i] = rxStats->ucastPktsRxOK + rxStats->mcastPktsRxOK + rxStats->bcastPktsRxOK; stats->q_ibytes[i] = rxStats->ucastBytesRxOK + rxStats->mcastBytesRxOK + rxStats->bcastBytesRxOK; stats->ipackets += stats->q_ipackets[i]; stats->ibytes += stats->q_ibytes[i]; stats->q_errors[i] = rxStats->pktsRxError; stats->ierrors += rxStats->pktsRxError; stats->rx_nombuf += rxStats->pktsRxOutOfBuf; }

The bnx2x driver sets the value in this way

stats->ierrors =
                HILO_U64(sc->eth_stats.error_bytes_received_hi,
                                sc->eth_stats.error_bytes_received_lo);

Can someone address this inconsistancY? What should stats->ierrors represent?

Tom Hall

Brocade Communications

             reply	other threads:[~2017-05-16 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-16 21:25 Tom Hall [this message]
2017-05-16 22:41 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1494969873552.80827@Brocade.com \
    --to=thall@brocade.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).