[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] ring: fix return value for sc and mc dequeue

[Anand B Jyoti <anand.b.jyoti@intel.com>]

The error return code for rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk() and
rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk() function should be -ENOENT rather
than -ENOBUFS as described in the function description.

Signed-off-by: Anand B Jyoti <anand.b.jyoti@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
index 97f025a..3400ed8 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ rte_ring_dequeue_bulk(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_table, unsigned int n,
 static inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
 rte_ring_mc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
 {
-	return rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL)  ? 0 : -ENOBUFS;
+	return rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL)  ? 0 : -ENOENT;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ rte_ring_mc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
 static inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
 rte_ring_sc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
 {
-	return rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOBUFS;
+	return rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4