DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] mem: add function for setting DMA mask
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:57:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496b1e0-f3de-2a02-a5d9-3e6c65eb93d4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD+H9934bLNk-E29NepX63RSWgmNxmuizOYPvEJoQFWARrBQPg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01-Nov-18 10:48 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:11 AM Burakov, Anatoly 
> <anatoly.burakov@intel.com <mailto:anatoly.burakov@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 31-Oct-18 5:29 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
>      > This patch adds the possibility of setting a dma mask to be used
>      > once the memory initialization is done.
>      >
>      > This is currently needed when IOVA mode is set by PCI related
>      > code and an x86 IOMMU hardware unit is present. Current code calls
>      > rte_mem_check_dma_mask but it is wrong to do so at that point
>      > because the memory has not been initialized yet.
>      >
>      > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com
>     <mailto:alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>>
>      > ---
>      >   lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c  | 10 ++++++++++
>      >   lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h | 10 ++++++++++
>      >   lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map         |  1 +
>      >   3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>      >
>      > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>     b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>      > index e0f08f39a..24b72fcb0 100644
>      > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>      > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
>      > @@ -480,6 +480,16 @@ rte_mem_check_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits)
>      >       return 0;
>      >   }
>      >
>      > +/* set dma mask to use when memory initialization is done */
>      > +void __rte_experimental
>      > +rte_mem_set_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits)
>      > +{
>      > +     struct rte_mem_config *mcfg =
>     rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
>      > +
>      > +     mcfg->dma_maskbits = mcfg->dma_maskbits == 0 ? maskbits :
>      > +                          RTE_MIN(mcfg->dma_maskbits, maskbits);
>      > +}
>      > +
>      >   /* return the number of memory channels */
>      >   unsigned rte_memory_get_nchannel(void)
>      >   {
>      > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>     b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>      > index ad3f3cfb0..eff028db1 100644
>      > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>      > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_memory.h
>      > @@ -466,6 +466,16 @@ unsigned rte_memory_get_nrank(void);
>      >   /* check memsegs iovas are within a range based on dma mask */
>      >   int __rte_experimental rte_mem_check_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits);
>      >
>      > +/**
>      > + *  * @warning
>      > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> 
>     I think there's a copy-paste error here (extra star and indent before
>     warning).
> 
> 
> I will fix this.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>      > + *
>      > + *  Set dma mask to use once memory initialization is done.
>      > + *  Previous function rte_mem_check_dma_mask can not be used
>      > + *  safely until memory has been initialized.
> 
>     IMO this really requires a big bold warning saying that this function
>     must only be called early during initialization, before memory is
>     initialized, and not to be called in user code.
> 
> 
> what about adding a new EAL variable for keeping memory initialization 
> status?
> It would be something like "uninit" until is changed to "done" after the 
> memory initialization is completed.
> That variable would help to avoid effective calls to set the dma mask 
> after initialization.

I'm not opposed to it in principle, however, this is a slippery slope 
towards having each and every subsystem storing their init status :)

That said, while it's not a complete solution because it won't prevent 
spurious calls to this function _after_ memory has initialized, there is 
a variable in internal_config that you can use to deny calls to this 
function after EAL init is complete (see internal_config->init_complete).

You could also store a static variable in eal_common_memory.c, and 
change it at the end of rte_eal_memory_init() call, but that does not 
really complete the memory initialization, because we then go to 
rte_eal_malloc_heap_init(), which actually completes the memory init.

I would greatly prefer using internal_config->init_complete - it is 
enough to forbid user code from calling it, while driver/DPDK developers 
presumably know what they're doing enough to read the warning and not 
try to call this after memory init :)

> 
>      > + */
>      > +void __rte_experimental rte_mem_set_dma_mask(uint8_t maskbits);
>      > +
>      >   /**
>      >    * Drivers based on uio will not load unless physical
>      >    * addresses are obtainable. It is only possible to get
>      > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>     b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>      > index ef8126a97..ae24b5c73 100644
>      > --- a/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>      > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map
>      > @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>      >       rte_devargs_remove;
>      >       rte_devargs_type_count;
>      >       rte_mem_check_dma_mask;
>      > +     rte_mem_set_dma_mask;
> 
>     Same, this needs to be alphabetic.
> 
>      >       rte_eal_cleanup;
>      >       rte_fbarray_attach;
>      >       rte_fbarray_destroy;
>      >
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Thanks,
>     Anatoly
> 


-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-01 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 17:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] fix DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] mem: fix call to " Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:11   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mem: use proper prefix Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:08   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 10:40     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 14:50     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-01 15:03       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 16:18         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] mem: add function for setting DMA mask Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:11   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 10:48     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:57       ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2018-11-01 11:30         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 14:32           ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] bus/pci: avoid call to DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:12   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] mem: modify error message for " Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:29   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 11:03     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 11:12       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 11:32         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] mem: add safe and unsafe versions for checking DMA mask Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:38   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 13:34     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] eal/mem: use DMA mask check for legacy memory Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 10:40   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 13:39     ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-01 14:28       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 14:32         ` Alejandro Lucero
2018-10-31 17:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] fix DMA mask check Alejandro Lucero
2018-11-02  5:52   ` Hyong Youb Kim
2018-11-01 10:13 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-01 17:28 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496b1e0-f3de-2a02-a5d9-3e6c65eb93d4@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).