From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com (mx5-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.37]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F626CD3 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:00:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.31]) by mx5-phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9JH02H7034914; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:00:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:00:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Rozet To: Michal Skalski Cc: Thomas F Herbert , Gregory Elkinbard , Fedor Zhadaev , dev@dpdk.org, "MichalSkalski, yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , Edward Warnicke , "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" Message-ID: <1501839924.3497992.1476896402171.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2986fc44-b2a1-f58c-62e0-eaf238a4fe08@redhat.com> <323284952.3467106.1476887275706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.10.59.43] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - GC49 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922) Thread-Topic: Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter Thread-Index: MnaBdoRHtZ7RH8E7hM95SzZBxVQW5A== Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv][fuel]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:00:24 -0000 Right, makes sense. Thanks Michal. Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michal Skalski" To: "Tim Rozet" , "Thomas F Herbert" Cc: "Gregory Elkinbard" , "Fedor Zhadaev" , dev@dpdk.org, "MichalSkalski , yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "Edward Warnicke" , "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 11:11:33 AM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv][fuel]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter Hi, Im looking at your fix now [1] as I understand it is only visible when we are using vxlan segmentation right? Currently Fuel support dpdk only with vlan segmentation, and this is how we deploy on linux foundation pod, so we may not seen this problem yet. [1]https://github.com/trozet/opnfv-tht/blob/stable/colorado/puppet/extraconfig/pre_deploy/compute/manifests/dpdk_dataplanes.pp#L151-L157 Michal > On 19 Oct 2016, at 16:27, Tim Rozet wrote: > > Fuel also supports the ovs dpdk scenario. > > Greg, Michal, Fedor, > How do does Fuel get around this on the LF UCS hardware? > > Tim Rozet > Red Hat SDN Team > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas F Herbert" > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org, "Edward Warnicke" > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 4:35:04 PM > Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [apex][ovsnfv]Problem showed up with OVS/DPDK with Cisco VIC adapter > > > > All: > > > This is not necessarily related to VPP but rather to OVS/DPDK. > > In OPNFV we found the following problem when using UCS NIC. > > The UCS fabric seems to set a VLAN tag on untagged packets. > > > Any thoughts from DPDK and VPP folks would be appreciated. > > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-16.07/nics/enic.html > > > https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/APEX-333 > > > It is currently deploying DPDK 16.04 and OVS 2.5.90 > > I could not find a user accessible setting to do this that would work. The workaround for now we came up with is to set a flow in OVS to strip the tag. > > > https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23315/ > > Another solution is to set the nic to strip the vlan in rte eth code or write a DPDK "app" to set the nic. > > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-16.07/nics/enic.html > > > --TFH > > -- > Thomas F Herbert > SDN Group > Office of Technology > Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss