From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6015D7EF0 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:51:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ts10so194546408obc.1 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:51:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mlGLaoWvrUqu5MXR0mcUqoyM7XgRqv8fGhjlLWQrrek=; b=J8GyoaMVCbCKkeaTcm8nw/xVNmp2QoZFawieP3zmW+JUDxmMt3xewFqkMx8YdZ+hLR diKoMZBj93xjCidccoSQh99RH1dYeoBjB+cz52kKhtSFRo1NufQfrFXKOlZZK5rLhJvN E/XUS9MU5c08Yk3mRpl6xpk4ECotiNDggzIJk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mlGLaoWvrUqu5MXR0mcUqoyM7XgRqv8fGhjlLWQrrek=; b=RPj0uQcddzf1qT4VNuOSoNow3knFbmqzwLNtRtRJ2yH1AXPRHHb0RJKv5LHXElbk6R R1Y4fkPUTDPiv90VBq8UAY3kwruuS9CFehbd62LLLhwlb+ugDAwl6ljoYSDDghhiones 4i1kcCkuwVYt4sYxKsmWev1XR2WOdfkMGma0OGCnEwLkvoLpxpTx8qKGbZNfKHA0Rsbm H75LGmHnI2mFljnCkxfXRVogkOD0HJWz7rfDRl7iHsoXJDGSiqeCkhiPXeaVe/XecL2h lH5Clasf75dre098xRF6/bwIMoKNQGcKWo9/xOGxfKB7ZjxZIxzlzk752GHzcC9rgTHv 6jww== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJXIIY/WbxNd4+np6VLrJ/Y4XoCVFRbQxFsR64R710xCEqtc1marukVtOt056tZjA== X-Received: by 10.182.24.131 with SMTP id u3mr16305964obf.58.1456915864760; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.21.0.12] (65-36-116-65.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [65.36.116.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm24817858oep.2.2016.03.02.02.51.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 02:51:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) From: Jim Thompson In-Reply-To: <56D6C4BB.3070904@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:51:03 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <15052233-E5BF-48F8-8EDB-BEE1868B20D9@netgate.com> References: <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <56D420E5.9010802@intel.com> <56D42462.3020905@scylladb.com> <1945473.Tiatd2m80T@xps13> <20160301180255.3ef1a17e@xeon-e3> <56D6A40F.80003@redhat.com> <56D6C4BB.3070904@6wind.com> To: Vincent JARDIN X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Cc: Avi Kivity , DPDK Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:51:05 -0000 > On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:47 AM, Vincent JARDIN = wrote: >=20 > Le 02/03/2016 09:27, Panu Matilainen a =C3=A9crit : >>>> I'd like to see these be merged. >>>>=20 >>>> Jay >>>=20 >>> The code is really not ready. I am okay with cooperative development >>> but the current code needs to go into a staging type tree. >>> No compatibility, no ABI guarantees, more of an RFC. >>> Don't want vendors building products with it then screaming when it >>> gets rebuilt/reworked/scrapped. >>>=20 >>=20 >> Exactly. >=20 > +1 too >=20 > We need to build on this innovation while there is a path for kernel = mainstream. The logic of using a staging is a good one. >=20 > Thomas, >=20 > can we open a staging folder into the DPDK like it is done into the = kernel? Can we take it as a requirement to support FreeBSD this time around?