From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/sfc: free mbufs in bulks on simple EF10 Tx datapath reap
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:33:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505295214-2307-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505295214-2307-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst | 6 +++++-
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst b/doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst
index 973a4a0..ae2b54a 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/sfc_efx.rst
@@ -245,12 +245,16 @@ boolean parameters value.
features available and required by the datapath implementation.
**efx** chooses libefx-based datapath which supports VLAN insertion
(full-feature firmware variant only), TSO and multi-segment mbufs.
+ Mbuf segments may come from different mempools, and mbuf reference
+ counters are treated responsibly.
**ef10** chooses EF10 (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx) native datapath which is
more efficient than libefx-based but has no VLAN insertion and TSO
support yet.
+ Mbuf segments may come from different mempools, and mbuf reference
+ counters are treated responsibly.
**ef10_simple** chooses EF10 (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx) native datapath which
is even more faster then **ef10** but does not support multi-segment
- mbufs.
+ mbufs, disallows multiple mempools and neglects mbuf reference counters.
- ``perf_profile`` [auto|throughput|low-latency] (default **throughput**)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
index db2a70b..94d1b10 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct sfc_dp_tx {
#define SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_TSO 0x2
#define SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_SEG 0x4
#define SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_PROCESS 0x8
+#define SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_POOL 0x10
+#define SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_REFCNT 0x20
sfc_dp_tx_qcreate_t *qcreate;
sfc_dp_tx_qdestroy_t *qdestroy;
sfc_dp_tx_qstart_t *qstart;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
index 5127a7a..9047b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
@@ -401,14 +401,25 @@ struct sfc_ef10_txq {
pending += sfc_ef10_tx_process_events(txq);
if (pending != completed) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *bulk[SFC_TX_REAP_BULK_SIZE];
+ unsigned int nb = 0;
+
do {
struct sfc_ef10_tx_sw_desc *txd;
txd = &txq->sw_ring[completed & ptr_mask];
- rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(txd->mbuf);
+ if (nb == RTE_DIM(bulk)) {
+ rte_mempool_put_bulk(bulk[0]->pool,
+ (void *)bulk, nb);
+ nb = 0;
+ }
+
+ bulk[nb++] = txd->mbuf;
} while (++completed != pending);
+ rte_mempool_put_bulk(bulk[0]->pool, (void *)bulk, nb);
+
txq->completed = completed;
}
@@ -614,6 +625,8 @@ struct sfc_dp_tx sfc_ef10_tx = {
.hw_fw_caps = SFC_DP_HW_FW_CAP_EF10,
},
.features = SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_SEG |
+ SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_POOL |
+ SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_REFCNT |
SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_PROCESS,
.qcreate = sfc_ef10_tx_qcreate,
.qdestroy = sfc_ef10_tx_qdestroy,
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
index 08299fe..9e65b6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@
if (~sa->dp_tx->features & SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_SEG)
dev_info->default_txconf.txq_flags |= ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS;
+ if (~sa->dp_tx->features & SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_POOL)
+ dev_info->default_txconf.txq_flags |= ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTMEMP;
+
+ if (~sa->dp_tx->features & SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_REFCNT)
+ dev_info->default_txconf.txq_flags |= ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOREFCOUNT;
+
#if EFSYS_OPT_RX_SCALE
if (sa->rss_support != EFX_RX_SCALE_UNAVAILABLE) {
dev_info->reta_size = EFX_RSS_TBL_SIZE;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
index bf59601..4ea7bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
@@ -91,6 +91,21 @@
rc = EINVAL;
}
+ if (((flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTMEMP) == 0) &&
+ (~sa->dp_tx->features & SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_POOL)) {
+ sfc_err(sa, "multi-mempool is not supported by %s datapath",
+ sa->dp_tx->dp.name);
+ rc = EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (((flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOREFCOUNT) == 0) &&
+ (~sa->dp_tx->features & SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_REFCNT)) {
+ sfc_err(sa,
+ "mbuf reference counters are neglected by %s datapath",
+ sa->dp_tx->dp.name);
+ rc = EINVAL;
+ }
+
if ((flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOVLANOFFL) == 0) {
if (!encp->enc_hw_tx_insert_vlan_enabled) {
sfc_err(sa, "VLAN offload is not supported");
@@ -1023,6 +1038,8 @@ struct sfc_dp_tx sfc_efx_tx = {
},
.features = SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_VLAN_INSERT |
SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_TSO |
+ SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_POOL |
+ SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_REFCNT |
SFC_DP_TX_FEAT_MULTI_SEG,
.qcreate = sfc_efx_tx_qcreate,
.qdestroy = sfc_efx_tx_qdestroy,
--
1.8.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 14:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/sfc: free mbufs in bulks on EF10 native " Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-08 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/sfc: free mbufs in bulks on simple EF10 " Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-12 18:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-13 9:32 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-12 18:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/sfc: free mbufs in bulks on EF10 native " Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-13 9:31 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-12 21:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-09-13 6:27 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-13 9:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Andrew Rybchenko
2017-09-13 9:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2017-09-15 11:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505295214-2307-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).