From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CFB1B202 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 18:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id q124so24033454wmb.0 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:12:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=cyeL7pn2IdOIjVZq0RfbjfSyDCM4tUw02Flsdsdjnn0=; b=N5p38uV/JIFMBoed+hC+yuiBz7S/jp0V6VvQukMSYnZPUF/XxnjHRGmROUDf+QrQhP a3E8Uc5+FaxA8HCA7Pz1pB7OKcI4hVtA5xFYuvjyOSMzBsS1OnYhqBhzI+RfmWmoht2w yCQtvw7DDhh3AxzbQ8zDAaWGolmK88KSLpvkYa6PmPSfLmbEmLxx8wlyyDYnnX4Cmh8u QKdGLxZBIiupgflolp4EAHlSqpc5sUFvQEaP/WqKDUsDGzeb45pZLrSD5yT1bn1YJ+yU 27AYk4/hX3pFr59wXnL0rGaEzbXjiaClS8wG5ngi3Gh7mrQ/cFZXkhsSu70AfJ2jgjkQ gMHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUta4qTje9b4s6FAmnVExXUbizLQF71jkEP88rDkdhUaRtnerHD s8WdI5mEhmVOeWp/zDtD8O8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBU4UudNVN/tuhH4A+mKcwAqygxbvUJxRjzXAMKweNDYsmaGluzwDr9F0q6Ih/zu01hEYliug== X-Received: by 10.28.37.195 with SMTP id l186mr9443396wml.144.1507565531968; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:23c5:bef3:400:4a51:b7ff:fe0b:4749]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm361191wry.62.2017.10.09.09.12.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1507565529.14973.1.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:12:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9687ec77-a8ea-1d22-bb00-94b30dc23c28@suse.de> References: <20171009132058.8915-1-bwiedemann@suse.de> <20171009132411.8992-1-bwiedemann@suse.de> <1507557080.28033.10.camel@debian.org> <9687ec77-a8ea-1d22-bb00-94b30dc23c28@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Sort list of entries in examples.dox X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 16:12:12 -0000 On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:36 +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote: > On 2017-10-09 15:51, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > If you are interested in reproducible builds please have a look at > > this > > patch series I submitted a while ago: > >=20 > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28386/ > >=20 > > I have verified that those patches make the build reproducible on > > Debian (x86/x86_64/arm64). > >=20 > > Feedback from SUSE is very welcome! >=20 > I am very interested in that topic. >=20 > and would like to see http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28387/ > merged > (instead of my patch). In case you want to have a look, the DPDK page on the Debian reproducible builds CI is the following: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/dpdk.htm= l A new build in experimental is failing but it looks like it's due to a different version of GCC being used between different builds. > If https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52076 gets merged, it will avoid > the > need for the others, except the above and > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28391/ > The latter I have not found necessary so far, but races are hard to > reproduce anyway. That last one was tricky, I'd say it happens one out of ten builds. Thanks for all your work, having the GNU Make wildcard sort out of the box would be really great! --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi