From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B16D1B7CD for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:01:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b9so10049089wmh.0 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:01:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=o1dhb8vg8wC1KhP9GAzHvzCoe0i7X4q44OYF0KPIylM=; b=ZAEC3oJa8UtHSnUC+OM2Nsj0Y9Uuwq3b5Gq1ClhSo0H1uZE0NvDhoLuDow/UHLxIAY Msxa1pGRmkVrTvZtQD3fBZaMa3GilmDHRPLBBo6kFVWKTnDPCq4zQwaxVRuyd8Dq/grj RpsocHjqNcXb7BQBE2/ffHlOQixsU0XgkuM42q5ScYIW4xS3mIJXbyL3C3z/1BiDyyh1 Gn3aSLi1BQXhPuKbuVsIr4bn9fUZIw4b382HkS+K7rihvBSE3oj0zp+yq29yQSdrlzUB z1LF12iwPhD2XzUa85Ep86AD0CoZSkk8G9W60z+x793kj6fo1D4ocowx/4likC8ZPMSa QzFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaV0qWSEJopLc9lxtAeHXQnBYBuS/4NKr1GFjeDc74CGNKJI0V0r ly1q6xMpnXz7Wkt4inF1yyI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TxCCOT1uh7FBViempe9dwNvDyLnnrjb/vdPlwjyycSjR056tfUyYeX0kcYkw70n1r+fVUlOg== X-Received: by 10.80.214.19 with SMTP id x19mr19985056edi.233.1508846461869; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([213.251.34.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm84989edi.31.2017.10.24.05.01.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1508846460.29685.19.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Remy Horton , dev@dpdk.org Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, wei.dai@intel.com Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:01:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8de2f02a-5434-3fb8-8fed-7bb013f6c49c@intel.com> References: <20171019134827.22740-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20171019134827.22740-2-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <1508429659.31273.2.camel@debian.org> <8de2f02a-5434-3fb8-8fed-7bb013f6c49c@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: pre-emptively document rte_eth_dev_reset error code X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:01:02 -0000 On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 07:18 +0100, Remy Horton wrote: > On 19/10/2017 17:14, Luca Boccassi wrote: > [..] > > We've adapted and used these patches with the early > > rte_eth_dev_reset > > for a year in production now, and we had a customer who requested > > it > > since they were running into the problem it solves (PF flaps). > >=20 > > I have adapted them on the latest 17.11 tree and tested with X540 > > 10gbit cards, and it seems to work as before. Should I send an RFC > > and > > CC all of you? >=20 > Since it sounds stable, probably best to post the updated/rebased > patch.=C2=A0 > Should get merged as long as nothing breaks. I can send an RFC later today. >=20 > > Incidentally, are there specific reasons why the VF functionality > > was > > dropped since the first patches were sent? >=20 > I'm personally not sure, but the others should know. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi