From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663BBC70E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:39:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so39181474wib.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=eGxgGGY2cPd/BzHM12VBAAeahZRG9VAhoEr18Icj1lg=;
 b=kTBDSXC2KB9Ty4PAogZgMYBzAXC5USheWtxKdqRIs0WDTuJCUzwNMRiEDZELzH7+EM
 WBmdOVIcrwe+qQFUpXoMQiOA/lBEAwiw4UfGLL9DOWdJp+BXbZuDjdURhDZ5jxR47qv9
 EZ68ljFwf1UL9YytIk6Se9sooVY9GTlVR+a4i+EhgUjDaszAk06ZXGxejKGZh2baVKvA
 QFLEv+fuN3LSbXjuOpeEYNvpeeVMUg9Fn2HXQydUcJKxmZjkL4Mt+dbN1RggaEYd9lGY
 OA6ZFTTs8+VUr93aYw/3YPAqRR932jeM0g9dWGPnU+KSQty52SFrK/o4fStqOVduaDFC
 619A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkulLc3xoehLlmkpvZ9Zh6sq9sh+ay8IawUUpIi/EfH1/KJPX/fDenOD0GziIE0eYZyxrpZ
X-Received: by 10.180.36.129 with SMTP id q1mr7917263wij.10.1438357168129;
 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ec19sm9033876wic.0.2015.07.31.08.39.26
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Montorsi, Francesco" <fmontorsi@empirix.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:38:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1508851.COqxzSR7FD@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <a80192fa37154d66adb788a03449970a@bilemail1.empirix.com>
References: <a80192fa37154d66adb788a03449970a@bilemail1.empirix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] conflict between ether_addr defined in rte_ether.h
	and the same structure in <net/ethernet.h>
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:39:28 -0000

Hi Francesco,

2015-07-31 15:18, Montorsi, Francesco:
> I 'm attempting to integrate DPDK code in an existing application,
> which includes <net/ethernet.h>.
> That standard glibc header already provides a structure named ether_addr

Yes it's a known problem.
See http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/2175/

Comments or help is welcome.
CC'ing Stephen who worked on a patch.