DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] config files maintenance
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:43:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508851.EJxvAFadW3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8B8482@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

2015-07-31 15:39, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2015-07-31 15:29, Zhang, Helin:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > > Can we remove i40e bulk alloc option?
> > >
> > > As the receiving functions are different for bulk_alloc or not, we need this flag.
> > 
> > What brings the non bulk alloc function?
> 
> Bulk-alloc means it will allocate mbufs in bulk, which was added before we supporting
> Vector PMD long long ago, to show the possible better performance.
> I think all was disabled by default, and later it is enabled by default for Linux.

Yes, I know that. My question was:
Why not removing the non bulk alloc Rx in i40e?
Who needs to disable I40E_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC?

I think you understand that the goal is remove some options and code
useless nowadays (maintenance stuff).

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 15:08 Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 15:29 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-31 15:31   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 15:39     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-31 15:43       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-07-31 16:34         ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-31 15:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-07-31 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 21:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sync linux/bsd config options Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 21:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ixgbe: fix offload config option name Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 21:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] config: enable same drivers options for linux and bsd Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 21:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] config: remove kni options for bsd Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-31 21:24     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-08-03 10:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sync linux/bsd config options Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1508851.EJxvAFadW3@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).