DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Guan <herbert.guan@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Cc: herbert.guan@arm.com, jianbo.liu@arm.com, phil.yang@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: provide performance difference ratio and test time
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508915626-21407-1-git-send-email-herbert.guan@arm.com> (raw)

The printed time values presented in TSC is not straight forward
showing the performance difference.  And if the high resolution
counter is not enabled, time value is too small to show the actual
performance (e.g. "1 - 1" seems the same but in fact the perfomance
diffs by 50% or more).
With the performance difference ratio caculated and printed, it'll be
easier for people to read and compare the performance between
rte_memcpy() and memcpy().
Since the TSC values' units may diff a lot on different platforms,
the total execution time of aligned/unaligned memcpy test are
provided to allow comparation between platforms.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Guan <herbert.guan@arm.com>
---
 test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c b/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c
index 91de856..b23026b 100644
--- a/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c
+++ b/test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
 
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_cycles.h>
@@ -241,8 +242,9 @@
             memcpy(dst+dst_addrs[t], src+src_addrs[t], size);               \
         total_time2 += rte_rdtsc() - start_time;                            \
     }                                                                       \
-    printf("%8.0f -",  (double)total_time /TEST_ITERATIONS);                \
-    printf("%5.0f",  (double)total_time2 / TEST_ITERATIONS);                \
+    printf("%3.0f -",  (double)total_time / TEST_ITERATIONS);                \
+    printf("%3.0f",  (double)total_time2 / TEST_ITERATIONS);                \
+    printf("(%6.2f%%) ", ((double)total_time - total_time2)*100/total_time2);  \
 } while (0)
 
 /* Run aligned memcpy tests for each cached/uncached permutation */
@@ -324,6 +326,9 @@
 perf_test(void)
 {
 	int ret;
+	struct timeval tv_begin, tv_end;
+	double time_aligned, time_unaligned;
+	double time_aligned_const, time_unaligned_const;
 
 	ret = init_buffers();
 	if (ret != 0)
@@ -340,26 +345,47 @@
 	do_uncached_write(large_buf_write, 0, small_buf_read, 1, SMALL_BUFFER_SIZE);
 
 	printf("\n** rte_memcpy() - memcpy perf. tests (C = compile-time constant) **\n"
-		   "======= ============== ============== ============== ==============\n"
-		   "   Size Cache to cache   Cache to mem   Mem to cache     Mem to mem\n"
-		   "(bytes)        (ticks)        (ticks)        (ticks)        (ticks)\n"
-		   "------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------");
+		   "======= ================= ================= ================= =================\n"
+		   "   Size   Cache to cache     Cache to mem      Mem to cache        Mem to mem\n"
+		   "(bytes)          (ticks)          (ticks)           (ticks)           (ticks)\n"
+		   "------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------");
 
-	printf("\n========================= %2dB aligned ============================",
+	printf("\n================================= %2dB aligned =================================",
 		alignment_unit);
 	/* Do aligned tests where size is a variable */
+	gettimeofday(&tv_begin, NULL);
 	perf_test_variable_aligned();
-	printf("\n------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------");
+	gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL);
+	time_aligned = (double)(tv_end.tv_sec - tv_begin.tv_sec)
+		+ ((double)tv_end.tv_usec - tv_begin.tv_usec)/1000000;
+	printf("\n------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------");
 	/* Do aligned tests where size is a compile-time constant */
+	gettimeofday(&tv_begin, NULL);
 	perf_test_constant_aligned();
-	printf("\n=========================== Unaligned =============================");
+	gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL);
+	time_aligned_const = (double)(tv_end.tv_sec - tv_begin.tv_sec)
+		+ ((double)tv_end.tv_usec - tv_begin.tv_usec)/1000000;
+	printf("\n================================== Unaligned ==================================");
 	/* Do unaligned tests where size is a variable */
+	gettimeofday(&tv_begin, NULL);
 	perf_test_variable_unaligned();
-	printf("\n------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------");
+	gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL);
+	time_unaligned = (double)(tv_end.tv_sec - tv_begin.tv_sec)
+		+ ((double)tv_end.tv_usec - tv_begin.tv_usec)/1000000;
+	printf("\n------- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------");
 	/* Do unaligned tests where size is a compile-time constant */
+	gettimeofday(&tv_begin, NULL);
 	perf_test_constant_unaligned();
-	printf("\n======= ============== ============== ============== ==============\n\n");
-
+	gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL);
+	time_unaligned_const = (double)(tv_end.tv_sec - tv_begin.tv_sec)
+		+ ((double)tv_end.tv_usec - tv_begin.tv_usec)/1000000;
+	printf("\n======= ================= ================= ================= =================\n\n");
+
+	printf("Test Execution Time (seconds):\n");
+	printf("Aligned variable copy size   = %8.3f\n", time_aligned);
+	printf("Aligned constant copy size   = %8.3f\n", time_aligned_const);
+	printf("Unaligned variable copy size = %8.3f\n", time_unaligned);
+	printf("Unaligned constant copy size = %8.3f\n", time_unaligned_const);
 	free_buffers();
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.8.3.1

             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-25  7:13 Herbert Guan [this message]
2017-10-26  6:23 ` Jianbo Liu
2017-11-07 17:20   ` Thomas Monjalon
     [not found] <1508726101-13009-1-git-send-email-herbert.guan@arm.com>
2017-10-24  2:58 ` Jianbo Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1508915626-21407-1-git-send-email-herbert.guan@arm.com \
    --to=herbert.guan@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).