From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D232661 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id r196so784863wmf.2 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:04:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=y6HfuEksaN316ybESYAxbaVa0tnXOvvzrWRSZDutt9w=; b=hjrFMIetszpv0K9dEdfp6iKFSKqkI174x8TT9Dvirpb4gKhFVPZYgwXQB2n8H9NLcD BqpzbEjMYZTPXPm/pWfqILxxydQaQU+wX7JVMKY1dH7fKMmd8Jd4/bsOPUMB32NfG5kZ c7BttNYkrY06mqQCeM1VVpQetBrvPksaZ4vQja6qcVcIw2bI81jKtOdIQ/oW7/NgJREv 7YUZ7N0JHBky84ePWiKy5zxZxtDc0pHoSZev6APF+PVhVlNc1InDrTL1hyW4zD3+8QsS E1AVdkVc+Wz1EcdzlY43f8Vf+2FoIVxGO+jtBYvNantdT2s7yym9/hFsO10H/lW8JOqg UtjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXe+d8djivnKaoz94GWsUhY+IH1ADyR/se79HfR1bGNwRjVK9WC aj2Ci/J1xLaKeyw/o3wPCniVoQwr X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TurjcRqC7Y7phurKx81eoZ/qWzNtLR4ZSh4gtRImzpVfq3OUFxSdFjrlkaTQQ7bTKV4LUnHw== X-Received: by 10.80.158.194 with SMTP id a60mr20153068edf.182.1508925884012; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([213.251.34.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm1550117eds.68.2017.10.25.03.04.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1508925882.5535.1.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, wei.dai@intel.com, remy.horton@intel.com Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:04:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20171024131630.16595-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: implement VF reset for i40e, e1000 and ixgbe X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:04:44 -0000 On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 18:17 -0700, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/24/2017 6:16 AM, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Luca Boccassi > >=20 > > These patches were originally sent by Wenzhuo Lu: > >=20 > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14009/ > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14010/ > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14011/ > >=20 > > The current rte_eth_dev_reset API does not correctly reset the VF > > when the PF flaps on the host. With these patches, at least the > > ixgbe > > driver with a X540 card (Linux kernel 4.9 on the host) appears to > > work correctly. > > The test is as simple ip link down/up on the host, and then check > > that > > traffic still flows through the VF in the guest. > >=20 > > I am not an expert in these PMDs hence the RFC mark - I would like > > to > > ask for feedback and help from the PMD maintainers and developers. > >=20 > > Thanks! > >=20 > > Luca Boccassi (3): > > =C2=A0 net/i40e: implement VF reset > > =C2=A0 net/e1000: implement VF reset > > =C2=A0 net/ixgbe: implement VF reset >=20 > Hi Luca, >=20 > Is this set targets this release? > Would you mind deferring this to next release, taking account that we > are so > close to release? >=20 > Thanks, > ferruh Hi Ferruh, Yes of course, actually not even the next release as it really needs feedback from the PMD developers/maintainers. I've marked it as RFC on patchwork as well, is that all that's needed? --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi