DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/hash: improve hash unit tests
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:35:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511524.5JONc7566D@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150710091159.GA10556@bricha3-MOBL3>

2015-07-10 10:11, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:54:30PM +0100, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> > Add new unit test for calculating the average table utilization,
> > using random keys, based on number of entries that can be added
> > until we encounter one that cannot be added (bucket if full).
> > 
> > Also, replace current hash_perf unit test to see performance more clear.
> s/clear/clearly/
> 
> > The current hash_perf unit test takes too long and add keys that
> > may or may not fit in the table and look up/delete that may not be
> > in the table. This new unit test gets a set of keys that we know
> > that fits in the table, and then measure the time to add/look up/delete
> > them.
> > 
> > Mind that performance numbers include time to take a random key
> s/Mind/Note/
> 
> > from a pre-made array of keys, plus a quick check of return value.
> > Also, as stated above, expect higher numbers, as all operations
> > in the new unit tests will be successful, which means that
> > it will take more time, than mixing both successful and unsuccesful
> > operations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> 
> Looks good, Pablo. 
> Thomas, perhaps you could make the above minor changes to
> the commit log when applying the patch.
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Applied with above comments, thanks

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 13:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Improve hash unit tests - Cuckoo hash part 2 Pablo de Lara
2015-07-08 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/hash: improve hash unit tests Pablo de Lara
2015-07-08 13:39   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-08 15:04   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-08 15:14     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-07-08 16:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] Improve hash unit tests - Cuckoo hash part 2 Pablo de Lara
2015-07-08 16:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/hash: improve hash unit tests Pablo de Lara
2015-07-09 12:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] Improve hash unit tests - Cuckoo hash part 2 Pablo de Lara
2015-07-09 12:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] test/hash: improve hash unit tests Pablo de Lara
2015-07-09 16:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] Improve hash unit tests - Cuckoo hash part 2 Pablo de Lara
2015-07-09 16:54         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/hash: improve hash unit tests Pablo de Lara
2015-07-10  9:11           ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-10 10:35             ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1511524.5JONc7566D@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).