From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F952BB0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:36:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a4so23185875wme.1 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:36:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=d8eK77qG4ekyjrsGJsJwk2VO5Ui4Mp2n4UAUqcUNzZs=; b=JmSr5ZuIdto6rL5BBWwS4dfTrKBuqygAICT4w5qzaMN7bXcdMtTgONaUiHeKt62Ms1 yOWvNgfsg+fiPmndXi+I61QEwFxn6zah0j8MUwT9BCy2z4ej+BvD6J1oEnLlVjkBly+s Ivz3vv8ziV/x2tvcgLFzo762YK9IDQfqLhzAcTgLCDUaOEtC4NV+ZH/yHDaBBK2RA0ws LVpknZv7iySeui0Z9wHzg+zd7hDb+bEGG1CZC8y1CvWD2OBPMjf9BTO9++v0jwMjsXcs xI0TpbZCeKE+T/WKWsckE2odliTBfgaAcq464vKHm66h2j1iAMRmuqRB06hmeF5dlTpS lfBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=d8eK77qG4ekyjrsGJsJwk2VO5Ui4Mp2n4UAUqcUNzZs=; b=ZVSpHaQBGBk7VjYiZfF9nxrfIHnVK2G7yGspJj+8sPCzEFqVc1ZUsEVWs3ugFDK84r 2y98G1/kUEu2URmxXln2/y5eoybr0L52jCMRNl544Fsr9r1mXUgZSQmtSERf340aIm8N GMt21pL7fvIVfyoTU8zzhxjLkGy9L6/tRBImZLJvNrKSjmCU8aioRS7O3rwbKKiZqixa P3oT00ns9y0Tjm2Pu3uNnil4A+ljD9UzQBsQ6aa3g09dSpPzvcOHCknX7l8QNijIbQ7i kBmc9xwbBayvSV4xOOHIGeXnvgGFjIqzBjyC9NJ4uBjRkYIZ84GxFU2Hezw9bsZgPwWE 2inQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORNOq0kBNuEkW03MYfzbULwbUQvy1n9Gn2QZ7ZJPCvyEgXIxA/dpRmyEYkWXx8ew0iL X-Received: by 10.194.3.110 with SMTP id b14mr38817986wjb.116.1456310187272; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm2786593wmv.12.2016.02.24.02.36.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:36:26 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:34:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1520606.5uKYNpmzaU@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B0AAF3@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20160224101011.GA19784@bricha3-MOBL3> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B0AAF3@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Kantecki, Tomasz" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:36:27 -0000 2016-02-24 10:22, Ananyev, Konstantin: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:10 AM > > To: Thomas Monjalon > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kantecki, Tomasz > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: Initial implementation of PQoS EAL extension > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 2016-02-23 23:03, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > > > If there is nothing specific in DPDK for PQos, why writing an example in > > > > > DPDK? > > > > The example makes it much easier to use the technology with DPDK. > > > > > > > > > Maybe the example should be better in the library itself. > > > > The library in question (https://github.com/01org/intel-cmt-cat) has a couple of examples but none of them refers to DPDK. > > > > > > > > > I suggest to mention the library in > > > > > doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.rst > > > > Ok it can be added to this document. Does it imply -1 for the sample code idea? > > > > > > I may be wrong but I have the feeling the example is more about PQoS than DPDK. > > > So yes, I would vote -1. > > > > > Well, the intersection of DPDK and PQoS is what the example is really all about, > > and as such it is relevant to both DPDK and the library itself. Platform QoS > > can be of great use to packet processing applications for helping to ensure that > > the app gets the resources it needed - especially in a virtualised world - and > > so we believe that having an example in DPDK showing how to use PQoS with DPDK > > is well worthwhile having. It's more effective than a simple doc update in > > raising awareness of the existence of the feature, and also provides for DPDK > > users a readily available app for the user to start playing with to evaluate > > PQoS for their own use-cases. > > +1 > I also think it is a good thing to have. > Again user don't have to trust the whitepapers - instead he can run the app > and measure performance gain on his particular platform. I totally agree the example is good to have. Konstantin, are you thinking it must be hosted in the PQoS lib repository?