DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/8] ipc: remove IPC thread for async request
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:03:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524150216-3407-5-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524150216-3407-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>

As discussed here, http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/36579/,
we remove IPC threads, rte_mp_handle and rte_mp_handle_async.
This patch targets to remove thread rte_mp_handle_async.

Previously, to handle replies for an async request, rte_mp_handle
wakes up the rte_mp_handle_async thread to process through
pending_requests.async_cond. Now, we change to handle that in
rte_mp_handle context directly.

To handle timeout events, for each async request which is sent,
we set an alarm for it. If its reply is received before timeout,
we will cancel the alarm when we handle the reply; otherwise,
alarm will invoke the async_reply_handle() as the alarm callback.

Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

Suggested-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c | 169 ++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
index 27de16e..4cb460e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <sys/un.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 
+#include <rte_alarm.h>
 #include <rte_common.h>
 #include <rte_cycles.h>
 #include <rte_eal.h>
@@ -94,14 +95,14 @@ TAILQ_HEAD(pending_request_list, pending_request);
 static struct {
 	struct pending_request_list requests;
 	pthread_mutex_t lock;
-	pthread_cond_t async_cond;
 } pending_requests = {
 	.requests = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(pending_requests.requests),
 	.lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
-	.async_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER
 	/**< used in async requests only */
 };
 
+static void async_reply_handle(void *arg);
+
 /* forward declarations */
 static int
 mp_send(struct rte_mp_msg *msg, const char *peer, int type);
@@ -299,9 +300,11 @@ process_msg(struct mp_msg_internal *m, struct sockaddr_un *s)
 
 			if (pending_req->type == REQUEST_TYPE_SYNC)
 				pthread_cond_signal(&pending_req->sync.cond);
-			else if (pending_req->type == REQUEST_TYPE_ASYNC)
-				pthread_cond_signal(
-					&pending_requests.async_cond);
+			else if (pending_req->type == REQUEST_TYPE_ASYNC) {
+				pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
+				async_reply_handle(pending_req);
+				pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
+			}
 		} else
 			RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Drop mp reply: %s\n", msg->name);
 		pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
@@ -450,115 +453,39 @@ trigger_async_action(struct pending_request *sr)
 	free(sr->request);
 }
 
-static struct pending_request *
-check_trigger(struct timespec *ts)
-{
-	struct pending_request *next, *cur, *trigger = NULL;
-
-	TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(cur, &pending_requests.requests, next, next) {
-		enum async_action action;
-		if (cur->type != REQUEST_TYPE_ASYNC)
-			continue;
-
-		action = process_async_request(cur, ts);
-		if (action == ACTION_FREE) {
-			TAILQ_REMOVE(&pending_requests.requests, cur, next);
-			free(cur);
-		} else if (action == ACTION_TRIGGER) {
-			TAILQ_REMOVE(&pending_requests.requests, cur, next);
-			trigger = cur;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	return trigger;
-}
-
 static void
-wait_for_async_messages(void)
-{
-	struct pending_request *sr;
-	struct timespec timeout;
-	bool timedwait = false;
-	bool nowait = false;
-	int ret;
-
-	/* scan through the list and see if there are any timeouts that
-	 * are earlier than our current timeout.
-	 */
-	TAILQ_FOREACH(sr, &pending_requests.requests, next) {
-		if (sr->type != REQUEST_TYPE_ASYNC)
-			continue;
-		if (!timedwait || timespec_cmp(&sr->async.param->end,
-				&timeout) < 0) {
-			memcpy(&timeout, &sr->async.param->end,
-				sizeof(timeout));
-			timedwait = true;
-		}
-
-		/* sometimes, we don't even wait */
-		if (sr->reply_received) {
-			nowait = true;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (nowait)
-		return;
-
-	do {
-		ret = timedwait ?
-			pthread_cond_timedwait(
-				&pending_requests.async_cond,
-				&pending_requests.lock,
-				&timeout) :
-			pthread_cond_wait(
-				&pending_requests.async_cond,
-				&pending_requests.lock);
-	} while (ret != 0 && ret != ETIMEDOUT);
-
-	/* we've been woken up or timed out */
-}
-
-static void *
-async_reply_handle(void *arg __rte_unused)
+async_reply_handle(void *arg)
 {
 	struct timeval now;
 	struct timespec ts_now;
-	while (1) {
-		struct pending_request *trigger = NULL;
+	enum async_action action;
+	struct pending_request *req = (struct pending_request *)arg;
 
-		pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
-
-		/* we exit this function holding the lock */
-		wait_for_async_messages();
-
-		if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) < 0) {
-			RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot get current time\n");
-			break;
-		}
-		ts_now.tv_nsec = now.tv_usec * 1000;
-		ts_now.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
-
-		do {
-			trigger = check_trigger(&ts_now);
-			/* unlock request list */
-			pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
-
-			if (trigger) {
-				trigger_async_action(trigger);
-				free(trigger);
+	if (gettimeofday(&now, NULL) < 0) {
+		/* This could lead to disaster */
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot get current time\n");
+		return;
+	}
+	ts_now.tv_nsec = now.tv_usec * 1000;
+	ts_now.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
 
-				/* we've triggered a callback, but there may be
-				 * more, so lock the list and check again.
-				 */
-				pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
-			}
-		} while (trigger);
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&pending_requests.lock);
+	action = process_async_request(req, &ts_now);
+	if (action == ACTION_NONE) {
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
+		return;
 	}
+	TAILQ_REMOVE(&pending_requests.requests, req, next);
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
 
-	RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "ERROR: asynchronous requests disabled\n");
+	if (action == ACTION_TRIGGER)
+		trigger_async_action(req);
 
-	return NULL;
+	if (rte_eal_alarm_cancel(async_reply_handle, req) < 0 &&
+	    rte_errno != EINPROGRESS)
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to cancel alarm\n");
+
+	free(req);
 }
 
 static int
@@ -624,7 +551,7 @@ rte_mp_channel_init(void)
 	char thread_name[RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN];
 	char path[PATH_MAX];
 	int dir_fd;
-	pthread_t mp_handle_tid, async_reply_handle_tid;
+	pthread_t mp_handle_tid;
 
 	/* create filter path */
 	create_socket_path("*", path, sizeof(path));
@@ -669,24 +596,10 @@ rte_mp_channel_init(void)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (pthread_create(&async_reply_handle_tid, NULL,
-			async_reply_handle, NULL) < 0) {
-		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "failed to create mp thead: %s\n",
-			strerror(errno));
-		close(mp_fd);
-		close(dir_fd);
-		mp_fd = -1;
-		return -1;
-	}
-
 	/* try best to set thread name */
 	snprintf(thread_name, RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN, "rte_mp_handle");
 	rte_thread_setname(mp_handle_tid, thread_name);
 
-	/* try best to set thread name */
-	snprintf(thread_name, RTE_MAX_THREAD_NAME_LEN, "rte_mp_async_handle");
-	rte_thread_setname(async_reply_handle_tid, thread_name);
-
 	/* unlock the directory */
 	flock(dir_fd, LOCK_UN);
 	close(dir_fd);
@@ -858,7 +771,7 @@ rte_mp_sendmsg(struct rte_mp_msg *msg)
 
 static int
 mp_request_async(const char *dst, struct rte_mp_msg *req,
-		struct async_request_param *param)
+		struct async_request_param *param, const struct timespec *ts)
 {
 	struct rte_mp_msg *reply_msg;
 	struct pending_request *pending_req, *exist;
@@ -903,6 +816,13 @@ mp_request_async(const char *dst, struct rte_mp_msg *req,
 
 	param->user_reply.nb_sent++;
 
+	if (rte_eal_alarm_set(ts->tv_sec * 1000000 + ts->tv_nsec / 10000,
+				async_reply_handle, pending_req) < 0) {
+		/* TODO: If error happends, turn to busy waiting */
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Fail to set alarm for request %s:%s\n",
+			dst, req->name);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 fail:
 	free(pending_req);
@@ -1124,7 +1044,7 @@ rte_mp_request_async(struct rte_mp_msg *req, const struct timespec *ts,
 
 	/* for secondary process, send request to the primary process only */
 	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY) {
-		ret = mp_request_async(eal_mp_socket_path(), copy, param);
+		ret = mp_request_async(eal_mp_socket_path(), copy, param, ts);
 
 		/* if we didn't send anything, put dummy request on the queue */
 		if (ret == 0 && reply->nb_sent == 0) {
@@ -1167,7 +1087,7 @@ rte_mp_request_async(struct rte_mp_msg *req, const struct timespec *ts,
 		snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/%s", mp_dir_path,
 			 ent->d_name);
 
-		if (mp_request_async(path, copy, param))
+		if (mp_request_async(path, copy, param, ts))
 			ret = -1;
 	}
 	/* if we didn't send anything, put dummy request on the queue */
@@ -1176,9 +1096,6 @@ rte_mp_request_async(struct rte_mp_msg *req, const struct timespec *ts,
 		dummy_used = true;
 	}
 
-	/* trigger async request thread wake up */
-	pthread_cond_signal(&pending_requests.async_cond);
-
 	/* finally, unlock the queue */
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pending_requests.lock);
 
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-19 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-19 15:03 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/8] remove IPC threads Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/8] ipc: clearn up code Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/8] ipc: fix timeout not properly handled in async Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/8] eal/linux: use glibc malloc in alarm Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` Jianfeng Tan [this message]
2018-04-20  9:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/8] ipc: remove IPC thread for async request Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 5/8] eal/linux: use glibc malloc in interrupt handling Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 6/8] eal: bring forward init of " Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 7/8] eal: add IPC type for interrupt thread Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 8/8] ipc: remove IPC thread for message read Jianfeng Tan
2018-04-19 15:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/8] remove IPC threads Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/6] Remove " Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 1/6] eal/linux: use glibc malloc in alarm Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/6] ipc: remove IPC thread for async requests Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 3/6] eal/linux: use glibc malloc in interrupt handling Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 4/6] eal: bring forward init of " Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 5/6] eal: add IPC type for interrupt thread Anatoly Burakov
2018-05-31 10:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 6/6] ipc: remove main IPC thread Anatoly Burakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524150216-3407-5-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --to=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).