DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix slave activation simultaneously
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:29:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524569370-6799-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> (raw)

The bonding PMD decides to activate\deactivate its slaves according to
the slaves link statuses.
Thus, it registers to the LSC events of the slaves ports and
activates\deactivates them from its LSC callbacks called asynchronously
by the host thread when the slave link status is changed.

In addition, the bonding PMD uses the callback for slave activation
when it tries to start it, this operation is probably called by the
master thread.

Consequently, a slave may be activated in the same time by two
different threads and may cause a lot of optional errors, for example,
slave mempool recreation with the same name causes an error.

Synchronize the critical section in the LSC callback using a special
new spinlock.

Fixes: 414b202343ce ("bonding: fix initial link status of slave")
Fixes: a45b288ef21a ("bond: support link status polling")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
index 2805c71..dffd12f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
@@ -2654,14 +2654,21 @@ struct bwg_slave {
 	if (!valid_slave)
 		return rc;
 
+	/* Synchronize lsc callback parallel calls either by real link event
+	 * from the slaves PMDs or by the bonding PMD itself.
+	 */
+	rte_spinlock_lock(&internals->lsc_lock);
+
 	/* Search for port in active port list */
 	active_pos = find_slave_by_id(internals->active_slaves,
 			internals->active_slave_count, port_id);
 
 	rte_eth_link_get_nowait(port_id, &link);
 	if (link.link_status) {
-		if (active_pos < internals->active_slave_count)
+		if (active_pos < internals->active_slave_count) {
+			rte_spinlock_unlock(&internals->lsc_lock);
 			return rc;
+		}
 
 		/* if no active slave ports then set this port to be primary port */
 		if (internals->active_slave_count < 1) {
@@ -2680,8 +2687,10 @@ struct bwg_slave {
 				internals->primary_port == port_id)
 			bond_ethdev_primary_set(internals, port_id);
 	} else {
-		if (active_pos == internals->active_slave_count)
+		if (active_pos == internals->active_slave_count) {
+			rte_spinlock_unlock(&internals->lsc_lock);
 			return rc;
+		}
 
 		/* Remove from active slave list */
 		deactivate_slave(bonded_eth_dev, port_id);
@@ -2734,6 +2743,9 @@ struct bwg_slave {
 						NULL);
 		}
 	}
+
+	rte_spinlock_unlock(&internals->lsc_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2942,6 +2954,7 @@ struct bwg_slave {
 	eth_dev->data->dev_flags = RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC;
 
 	rte_spinlock_init(&internals->lock);
+	rte_spinlock_init(&internals->lsc_lock);
 
 	internals->port_id = eth_dev->data->port_id;
 	internals->mode = BONDING_MODE_INVALID;
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
index 94eca88..9220b61 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_private.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct bond_dev_private {
 	uint8_t mode;						/**< Link Bonding Mode */
 
 	rte_spinlock_t lock;
+	rte_spinlock_t lsc_lock;
 
 	uint16_t primary_port;			/**< Primary Slave Port */
 	uint16_t current_primary_port;		/**< Primary Slave Port */
-- 
1.9.5

             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-24 11:29 Matan Azrad [this message]
2018-05-14  2:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-14 11:45 ` Doherty, Declan
2018-05-14 12:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-14 15:01     ` Chas Williams
2018-05-15  8:24       ` Matan Azrad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524569370-6799-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com \
    --to=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).