From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EEE37AC for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n129so136050122wmn.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 08:18:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KxSAX1PrudOVvjyuvotEMivwv3K9ZXqStJdicTjgQWo=; b=rUfpdKzDdzDGMLAN1uIjb/2QWSURl95DTb3pS0/H++e4myUs74tkvDxTJ9F3mw4vBE qO8uzlGRrBm9/XVboOAr2BamfgrLOFkUtDQ/ynBK9+ohz0K6Zq1VDrxdHRhPaD1tZYxl v+SgxXvl+qXEgLZZJVJJBhbBIQ6/bX6py1jeXnnaq7GNCX4+P19D/eIUoFf5mRblVMUy OO2rU4xlmzKw6Uo8GKxjwnZNRgtmdUwinlQrrLJYU7iLiUQ5uVEebKqEN5E+4kPeLQVt HwBkfAJjHJ8ZIeikmxLFXy6zxZkuAWb8ndcfGTKgGKSwawNmtO/f2BNn+5IVPpydRdXo gwRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KxSAX1PrudOVvjyuvotEMivwv3K9ZXqStJdicTjgQWo=; b=gvacb8Gf+PhRwAJFg3IN/ubLZ8f3HvFhvdRzI94hLSbipjBiyxOc8B6VxRz7zffpRU q7S1WTtnSgpQ7SznTpKeUwZcFujFBPWYpB6dUqly1r3+RitMv1Lq8bco5/GBVl54HAW/ BouscDTN9fgogrfmgE3pjhv5PSMJtpRmWv1lJj7LX8NfLUTqkHJdcGaxQCe2to7lEzfy gLf3cfPr34zfHosLXgqqgzPHsa++WGo9qN9qFoUhcXDN6UrkJwTFRGPH/GJOwXL86gX5 Zvk999dgsp/YqqCylfMO2Cv0666FFku9JApFU4C/DLFcwvT/MeQQj06mLtXH11TmS+KN vACQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXn+ybJTKue6OOcO8JnBJSGwi2fE0B1gpfe9NhQ5t9UX1I9cmOYq7X8umwbuQL864nn X-Received: by 10.28.26.200 with SMTP id a191mr25004198wma.55.1464103079978; Tue, 24 May 2016 08:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r75sm19847497wme.18.2016.05.24.08.17.59 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 08:17:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 17:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1526965.jALf8tAed9@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1462969011-378-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1462551208-4300-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1462969011-378-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: isolate lpm performance cases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:18:00 -0000 2016-05-11 14:16, Thomas Monjalon: > The LPM performance tests should not be mixed with > functional tests: they are long and show some statistics. > > LPM6 functional tests are added to parallel tests. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > v2: move LPM6 autotest in parallel tests > > app/test/Makefile | 2 + > app/test/autotest_data.py | 19 ++-- > app/test/test_lpm.c | 211 +-------------------------------------- > app/test/test_lpm6.c | 155 +---------------------------- > app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 249 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 454 insertions(+), 373 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 app/test/test_lpm6_perf.c > create mode 100644 app/test/test_lpm_perf.c Applied