DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
@ 2018-05-23 10:05 Vipin Varghese
  2018-05-24 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vipin Varghese @ 2018-05-23 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, qi.z.zhang, marko.kovacevic; +Cc: deepak.k.jain, Vipin Varghese

ETH APIs dev_attach and dev_dettach can be exercised from primary
process only. Secondary process only maps the resource and does
not have access to internal device list. Hence updating documentation
to reflect the same.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
index 36e3984..6afcf9f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs, uint16_t *port_id);
  * This function must be called when the device is in the
  * closed state.
  *
+ * Note:
+ * - Currently supported for primary process only.
+ *
  * @param port_id
  *   The port identifier of the device to detach.
  * @param devname
@@ -1493,6 +1496,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_detach(uint16_t port_id, char *devname);
  * Convert a numerical speed in Mbps to a bitmap flag that can be used in
  * the bitmap link_speeds of the struct rte_eth_conf
  *
+ * Note:
+ * - Currently supported for primary process only.
+ *
  * @param speed
  *   Numerical speed value in Mbps
  * @param duplex
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
  2018-05-23 10:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation Vipin Varghese
@ 2018-05-24 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2018-05-25  0:44   ` Zhang, Qi Z
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-05-24 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vipin Varghese
  Cc: dev, qi.z.zhang, marko.kovacevic, deepak.k.jain, ferruh.yigit

23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs, uint16_t *port_id);
>   * This function must be called when the device is in the
>   * closed state.
>   *
> + * Note:
> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.

I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release notes.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
  2018-05-24 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-05-25  0:44   ` Zhang, Qi Z
  2018-05-25  8:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-05-25  0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Varghese, Vipin
  Cc: dev, Kovacevic, Marko, Jain, Deepak K, Yigit, Ferruh



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko
> <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>;
> Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
> limitation
> 
> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
> uint16_t *port_id);
> >   * This function must be called when the device is in the
> >   * closed state.
> >   *
> > + * Note:
> > + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
> 
> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release notes.

For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process' white list but in primary process's)
And we should not detached a device in secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be attached again.

For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not exist in primary process.

> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
  2018-05-25  0:44   ` Zhang, Qi Z
@ 2018-05-25  8:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
  2018-05-25  9:08       ` Zhang, Qi Z
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-05-25  8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang, Qi Z, Thomas Monjalon, Varghese, Vipin
  Cc: dev, Kovacevic, Marko, Jain, Deepak K

On 5/25/2018 1:44 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
>> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko
>> <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>;
>> Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
>> limitation
>>
>> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
>> uint16_t *port_id);
>>>   * This function must be called when the device is in the
>>>   * closed state.
>>>   *
>>> + * Note:
>>> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
>>
>> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
>> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release notes.
> 
> For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process' white list but in primary process's)
> And we should not detached a device in secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be attached again.
> 
> For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not exist in primary process.

For vdev it was possible to attach a new device in secondary, but it seems
primary process checks has been added to virtual PMDs probe() function by [1]
which seems breaking this capability, can you please check it?


[1]
Fixes: ee27edbe0c10 ("drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process")

> 
>>
>>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
  2018-05-25  8:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-05-25  9:08       ` Zhang, Qi Z
  2018-05-25  9:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-05-25  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yigit, Ferruh, Thomas Monjalon, Varghese, Vipin
  Cc: dev, Kovacevic, Marko, Jain, Deepak K



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 4:35 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain,
> Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
> limitation
> 
> On 5/25/2018 1:44 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
> >> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kovacevic,
> >> Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
> >> <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for
> >> functional limitation
> >>
> >> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
> >>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >>> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
> >> uint16_t *port_id);
> >>>   * This function must be called when the device is in the
> >>>   * closed state.
> >>>   *
> >>> + * Note:
> >>> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
> >>
> >> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
> >> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release
> notes.
> >
> > For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource
> > mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process'
> white list but in primary process's) And we should not detached a device in
> secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be
> attached again.
> >
> > For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not
> exist in primary process.
> 
> For vdev it was possible to attach a new device in secondary, but it seems
> primary process checks has been added to virtual PMDs probe() function by [1]
> which seems breaking this capability, can you please check it?

Yes, attach vdev "net_af_packet,iface=eth0" on secondary process will create a private device.
> 
> 
> [1]
> Fixes: ee27edbe0c10 ("drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process")
> 
> >
> >>
> >>
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation
  2018-05-25  9:08       ` Zhang, Qi Z
@ 2018-05-25  9:12         ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-05-25  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang, Qi Z, Thomas Monjalon, Varghese, Vipin
  Cc: dev, Kovacevic, Marko, Jain, Deepak K

On 5/25/2018 10:08 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 4:35 PM
>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
>> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain,
>> Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
>> limitation
>>
>> On 5/25/2018 1:44 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
>>>> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kovacevic,
>>>> Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
>>>> <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for
>>>> functional limitation
>>>>
>>>> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
>>>> uint16_t *port_id);
>>>>>   * This function must be called when the device is in the
>>>>>   * closed state.
>>>>>   *
>>>>> + * Note:
>>>>> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
>>>>
>>>> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
>>>> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release
>> notes.
>>>
>>> For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource
>>> mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process'
>> white list but in primary process's) And we should not detached a device in
>> secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be
>> attached again.
>>>
>>> For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not
>> exist in primary process.
>>
>> For vdev it was possible to attach a new device in secondary, but it seems
>> primary process checks has been added to virtual PMDs probe() function by [1]
>> which seems breaking this capability, can you please check it?
> 
> Yes, attach vdev "net_af_packet,iface=eth0" on secondary process will create a private device.

Yep, Qi kindly explained me that it is still possible create vdevs using
rte_eth_dev_attach() on secondary process.

So this patch is not exactly correct.

>>
>>
>> [1]
>> Fixes: ee27edbe0c10 ("drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process")
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-25  9:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-23 10:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional limitation Vipin Varghese
2018-05-24 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-25  0:44   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-05-25  8:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-25  9:08       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-05-25  9:12         ` Ferruh Yigit

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).