From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA142C38; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id o13-v6so13866574wmf.4; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:38:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=L74owKWNUOM5DG+T72FFrNWys3PCBjNm5aaSUmSu9C4=; b=iLikWvs4ot18dlpwgxeRlPM4Kfa4xRfnabQzp92cXcFa5274f8V5lvyi0QP0QrbO4j 0HaShZ3K+1fCheMxK9llQxthn84xlP1G3VrFXk3cI4Zi19z1ZKn1nHqJ1ixrReOQbklr We6CW9hzwXpHvUEob+8uYT0EhWAkxS50pq6IcZOSmCFVXJcgfb+7wLcONdo2ZRzmse6x On2tBndgWZ2OYc6S3/0vcxnb6l7QAyzvwc4ueYx1OmTTfZPY/QZ3PvGPuVhImoGdTRLR prOOO/+T41QmHNZ743fJEcmD2Db4VHoVsz1T8El2CMaZRRKPqEEXsWw2AADl8sSei0Va hNIw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcpMoPbv109w271kb6xYYP6u6rH5PCN2gTB07+3lD0ZUSZrtGe8 2ZoZtBzy5LGwUVFmomGzPKo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJbJR/3fQKB/QWWGg5Tz6yB7H7bbufaDnZpa61MNIy9vvoB28yWMs4ANy/gERWthqgYJPD/Nw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f407:: with SMTP id z7-v6mr8074458wma.143.1528101519942; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:23c5:be9a:5200:ce4c:82c0:d567:ecbb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2-v6sm19429865wrn.77.2018.06.04.01.38.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1528101517.6997.78.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Shreyansh Jain Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:38:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1527762399.6997.44.camel@debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] Regression tests for stable releases from companies involved in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 08:38:40 -0000 On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 05:24 +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Luca >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi > > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:57 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regression tests for stable releases from > > companies > > involved in DPDK > >=20 > > Hello all, > >=20 > > At this morning's release meeting (minutes coming soon from John), > > we > > briefly discussed the state of the regression testing for stable > > releases and agreed we need to formalise the process. > >=20 > > At the moment we have a firm commitment from Intel and Mellanox to > > test > > all stable branches (and if I heard correctly from NXP as well? > > Please >=20 > Yes, I confirmed that on call on behalf of NXP. But... >=20 > > confirm!). AT&T committed to run regressions on the 16.11 branch. >=20 > Not until 17.05 did NXP's first driver started appearing in the DPDK > upstream releases. Somehow, I misunderstood your request for 16.11 > with 17.11 stable. That's fine - the 17.11 branch is also getting ready for release (see relevant threads), and 18.02 will soon as well. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi