DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] test/bpf: add new test-case for external function call
Date: Fri,  8 Jun 2018 09:42:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528447355-29411-4-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1528447355-29411-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
 test/test/test_bpf.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/test/test_bpf.c b/test/test/test_bpf.c
index 1e9caef95..fa17c4f74 100644
--- a/test/test/test_bpf.c
+++ b/test/test/test_bpf.c
@@ -1551,6 +1551,138 @@ static const struct rte_bpf_xsym test_call1_xsym[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+static const struct ebpf_insn test_call2_prog[] = {
+
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | EBPF_MOV | BPF_X),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+		.imm = -(int32_t)sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | EBPF_MOV | BPF_X),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_2,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_2,
+		.imm = -2 * (int32_t)sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_JMP | EBPF_CALL),
+		.imm = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | EBPF_DW),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+		.off = -(int32_t)(sizeof(struct dummy_offset) -
+			offsetof(struct dummy_offset, u64)),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+		.off = -(int32_t)(sizeof(struct dummy_offset) -
+			offsetof(struct dummy_offset, u32)),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+		.off = -(int32_t)(2 * sizeof(struct dummy_offset) -
+			offsetof(struct dummy_offset, u16)),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_10,
+		.off = -(int32_t)(2 * sizeof(struct dummy_offset) -
+			offsetof(struct dummy_offset, u8)),
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X),
+		.dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+		.src_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+	},
+	{
+		.code = (BPF_JMP | EBPF_EXIT),
+	},
+
+};
+
+static void
+dummy_func2(struct dummy_offset *a, struct dummy_offset *b)
+{
+	uint64_t v;
+
+	v = 0;
+	a->u64 = v++;
+	a->u32 = v++;
+	a->u16 = v++;
+	a->u8 = v++;
+	b->u64 = v++;
+	b->u32 = v++;
+	b->u16 = v++;
+	b->u8 = v++;
+}
+
+static int
+test_call2_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
+{
+	uint64_t v;
+	struct dummy_offset a, b;
+
+	RTE_SET_USED(arg);
+
+	dummy_func2(&a, &b);
+	v = a.u64 + a.u32 + b.u16 + b.u8;
+
+	if (v != rc) {
+		printf("%s@%d: invalid return value "
+			"expected=0x%" PRIx64 ", actual=0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
+			__func__, __LINE__, v, rc);
+		return -1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct rte_bpf_xsym test_call2_xsym[] = {
+	{
+		.name = RTE_STR(dummy_func2),
+		.type = RTE_BPF_XTYPE_FUNC,
+		.func = {
+			.val = (void *)dummy_func2,
+			.nb_args = 2,
+			.args = {
+				[0] = {
+					.type = RTE_BPF_ARG_PTR,
+					.size = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+				},
+				[1] = {
+					.type = RTE_BPF_ARG_PTR,
+					.size = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+				},
+			},
+		},
+	},
+};
+
 static const struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "test_store1",
@@ -1710,6 +1842,24 @@ static const struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		/* for now don't support function calls on 32 bit platform */
 		.allow_fail = (sizeof(uint64_t) != sizeof(uintptr_t)),
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "test_call2",
+		.arg_sz = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+		.prm = {
+			.ins = test_call2_prog,
+			.nb_ins = RTE_DIM(test_call2_prog),
+			.prog_arg = {
+				.type = RTE_BPF_ARG_PTR,
+				.size = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+			},
+			.xsym = test_call2_xsym,
+			.nb_xsym = RTE_DIM(test_call2_xsym),
+		},
+		.prepare = test_store1_prepare,
+		.check_result = test_call2_check,
+		/* for now don't support function calls on 32 bit platform */
+		.allow_fail = (sizeof(uint64_t) != sizeof(uintptr_t)),
+	},
 };
 
 static int
-- 
2.13.6

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-08  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-08  8:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] bpf: extend validation of input BPF programs Konstantin Ananyev
2018-06-08  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] bpf: add extra information for external symbol definitions Konstantin Ananyev
2018-06-08  8:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] bpf: add extra validation for input BPF program Konstantin Ananyev
2018-06-08  8:42 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2018-07-12  7:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] bpf: extend validation of input BPF programs Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1528447355-29411-4-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).