DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom
Date: Wed,  4 Jul 2018 19:25:49 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530712550-18099-3-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530712550-18099-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>

Crypto dev would specify its headroom and tailroom requirement and the
application is expected to honour this while creating buffers.

Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
---
v1:
* Accomodated the name change of new fields

 app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h     |  2 ++
 app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 app/test-crypto-perf/main.c              | 17 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h
index 350ad7e..f5bf03c 100644
--- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h
+++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ struct cperf_options {
 
 	uint32_t pool_sz;
 	uint32_t total_ops;
+	uint32_t headroom_sz;
+	uint32_t tailroom_sz;
 	uint32_t segment_sz;
 	uint32_t test_buffer_size;
 	uint32_t *imix_buffer_sizes;
diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
index 423782c..e803dc1 100644
--- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
+++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_test_common.c
@@ -11,12 +11,15 @@ struct obj_params {
 	uint32_t src_buf_offset;
 	uint32_t dst_buf_offset;
 	uint16_t segment_sz;
+	uint16_t headroom_sz;
+	uint16_t data_len;
 	uint16_t segments_nb;
 };
 
 static void
 fill_single_seg_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct rte_mempool *mp,
-		void *obj, uint32_t mbuf_offset, uint16_t segment_sz)
+		void *obj, uint32_t mbuf_offset, uint16_t segment_sz,
+		uint16_t headroom, uint16_t data_len)
 {
 	uint32_t mbuf_hdr_size = sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
 
@@ -26,10 +29,10 @@ fill_single_seg_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct rte_mempool *mp,
 	m->buf_iova = rte_mempool_virt2iova(obj) +
 		mbuf_offset + mbuf_hdr_size;
 	m->buf_len = segment_sz;
-	m->data_len = segment_sz;
+	m->data_len = data_len;
 
-	/* No headroom needed for the buffer */
-	m->data_off = 0;
+	/* Use headroom specified for the buffer */
+	m->data_off = headroom;
 
 	/* init some constant fields */
 	m->pool = mp;
@@ -42,7 +45,7 @@ fill_single_seg_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct rte_mempool *mp,
 static void
 fill_multi_seg_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct rte_mempool *mp,
 		void *obj, uint32_t mbuf_offset, uint16_t segment_sz,
-		uint16_t segments_nb)
+		uint16_t headroom, uint16_t data_len, uint16_t segments_nb)
 {
 	uint16_t mbuf_hdr_size = sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
 	uint16_t remaining_segments = segments_nb;
@@ -57,10 +60,10 @@ fill_multi_seg_mbuf(struct rte_mbuf *m, struct rte_mempool *mp,
 		m->buf_iova = next_seg_phys_addr;
 		next_seg_phys_addr += mbuf_hdr_size + segment_sz;
 		m->buf_len = segment_sz;
-		m->data_len = segment_sz;
+		m->data_len = data_len;
 
-		/* No headroom needed for the buffer */
-		m->data_off = 0;
+		/* Use headroom specified for the buffer */
+		m->data_off = headroom;
 
 		/* init some constant fields */
 		m->pool = mp;
@@ -99,10 +102,12 @@ mempool_obj_init(struct rte_mempool *mp,
 	op->sym->m_src = m;
 	if (params->segments_nb == 1)
 		fill_single_seg_mbuf(m, mp, obj, params->src_buf_offset,
-				params->segment_sz);
+				params->segment_sz, params->headroom_sz,
+				params->data_len);
 	else
 		fill_multi_seg_mbuf(m, mp, obj, params->src_buf_offset,
-				params->segment_sz, params->segments_nb);
+				params->segment_sz, params->headroom_sz,
+				params->data_len, params->segments_nb);
 
 
 	/* Set destination buffer */
@@ -110,7 +115,8 @@ mempool_obj_init(struct rte_mempool *mp,
 		m = (struct rte_mbuf *) ((uint8_t *) obj +
 				params->dst_buf_offset);
 		fill_single_seg_mbuf(m, mp, obj, params->dst_buf_offset,
-				params->segment_sz);
+				params->segment_sz, params->headroom_sz,
+				params->data_len);
 		op->sym->m_dst = m;
 	} else
 		op->sym->m_dst = NULL;
@@ -172,6 +178,11 @@ cperf_alloc_common_memory(const struct cperf_options *options,
 
 	struct obj_params params = {
 		.segment_sz = options->segment_sz,
+		.headroom_sz = options->headroom_sz,
+		/* Data len = segment size - (headroom + tailroom) */
+		.data_len = options->segment_sz -
+			    options->headroom_sz -
+			    options->tailroom_sz,
 		.segments_nb = segments_nb,
 		.src_buf_offset = crypto_op_total_size_padded,
 		.dst_buf_offset = 0
diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
index 4ae1439..2c46525 100644
--- a/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
+++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/main.c
@@ -149,6 +149,23 @@ cperf_initialize_cryptodev(struct cperf_options *opts, uint8_t *enabled_cdevs,
 			.nb_descriptors = opts->nb_descriptors
 		};
 
+		/**
+		 * Device info specifies the min headroom and tailroom
+		 * requirement for the crypto PMD. This need to be honoured
+		 * by the application, while creating mbuf.
+		 */
+		if (opts->headroom_sz < cdev_info.min_mbuf_headroom_req) {
+			/* Update headroom */
+			opts->headroom_sz = cdev_info.min_mbuf_headroom_req;
+		}
+		if (opts->tailroom_sz < cdev_info.min_mbuf_tailroom_req) {
+			/* Update tailroom */
+			opts->tailroom_sz = cdev_info.min_mbuf_tailroom_req;
+		}
+
+		/* Update segment size to include headroom & tailroom */
+		opts->segment_sz += (opts->headroom_sz + opts->tailroom_sz);
+
 		if (session_pool_socket[socket_id] == NULL) {
 			char mp_name[RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE];
 			struct rte_mempool *sess_mp;
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  6:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-06-19  6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-06-21 14:24   ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-22  6:52     ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-22 10:03       ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-26 10:12   ` Doherty, Declan
2018-06-28  2:56     ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-28 11:41       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-06-28 11:59         ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-19  6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-06-28 11:42   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-04 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 10:26     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 10:50       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2018-07-10 11:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:16     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:48     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 12:23       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 13:27         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 14:08           ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] crypto/scheduler: add minimum head/tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 17:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 17:29       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1530712550-18099-3-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).