From: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Ankur Dwivedi <ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:25:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530712550-18099-4-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530712550-18099-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
Crypto PMDs would specify the head/tailroom it would use while
processing the crypto requests. This need to be considered while
verifying buffers processed by crypto PMDs.
Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
---
v1:
* Added patch
test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c b/test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
index 256a7da..c64b0c1 100644
--- a/test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
+++ b/test/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
@@ -75,8 +75,9 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
int nb_segs = 1;
+ rte_cryptodev_info_get(dev_id, &dev_info);
+
if (t->feature_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_FEATURE_SG) {
- rte_cryptodev_info_get(dev_id, &dev_info);
if (!(dev_info.feature_flags &
RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER)) {
printf("Device doesn't support scatter-gather. "
@@ -438,11 +439,34 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
uint8_t value;
uint32_t head_unchanged_len, changed_len = 0;
uint32_t i;
+ uint32_t hdroom_used = 0, tlroom_used = 0;
+ uint32_t hdroom = 0;
mbuf = sym_op->m_src;
+ /*
+ * Crypto PMDs specify the headroom & tailroom it would use
+ * when processing the crypto operation. PMD is free to modify
+ * this space, and so the verification check should skip that
+ * block.
+ */
+ hdroom_used = dev_info.min_mbuf_headroom_req;
+ tlroom_used = dev_info.min_mbuf_tailroom_req;
+
+ /* Get headroom */
+ hdroom = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf);
+
head_unchanged_len = mbuf->buf_len;
for (i = 0; i < mbuf->buf_len; i++) {
+
+ /* Skip headroom used by PMD */
+ if (i == hdroom - hdroom_used)
+ i += hdroom_used;
+
+ /* Skip tailroom used by PMD */
+ if (i == (hdroom + mbuf->data_len))
+ i += tlroom_used;
+
value = *((uint8_t *)(mbuf->buf_addr)+i);
if (value != tmp_src_buf[i]) {
snprintf(test_msg, BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_MSG_LEN,
@@ -455,14 +479,13 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
mbuf = sym_op->m_dst;
if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH) {
- head_unchanged_len = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf) +
- sym_op->auth.data.offset;
+ head_unchanged_len = hdroom + sym_op->auth.data.offset;
changed_len = sym_op->auth.data.length;
if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH_GEN)
changed_len += digest_len;
} else {
/* cipher-only */
- head_unchanged_len = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf) +
+ head_unchanged_len = hdroom +
sym_op->cipher.data.offset;
changed_len = sym_op->cipher.data.length;
}
@@ -486,15 +509,30 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
uint8_t value;
uint32_t head_unchanged_len = 0, changed_len = 0;
uint32_t i;
+ uint32_t hdroom_used = 0, tlroom_used = 0;
+ uint32_t hdroom = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Crypto PMDs specify the headroom & tailroom it would use
+ * when processing the crypto operation. PMD is free to modify
+ * this space, and so the verification check should skip that
+ * block.
+ */
+ hdroom_used = dev_info.min_mbuf_headroom_req;
+ tlroom_used = dev_info.min_mbuf_tailroom_req;
mbuf = sym_op->m_src;
+
+ /* Get headroom */
+ hdroom = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf);
+
if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_CIPHER) {
- head_unchanged_len = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf) +
+ head_unchanged_len = hdroom +
sym_op->cipher.data.offset;
changed_len = sym_op->cipher.data.length;
} else {
/* auth-only */
- head_unchanged_len = rte_pktmbuf_headroom(mbuf) +
+ head_unchanged_len = hdroom +
sym_op->auth.data.offset +
sym_op->auth.data.length;
changed_len = 0;
@@ -504,8 +542,18 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
changed_len += digest_len;
for (i = 0; i < mbuf->buf_len; i++) {
+
+ /* Skip headroom used by PMD */
+ if (i == hdroom - hdroom_used)
+ i += hdroom_used;
+
if (i == head_unchanged_len)
i += changed_len;
+
+ /* Skip tailroom used by PMD */
+ if (i == (hdroom + mbuf->data_len))
+ i += tlroom_used;
+
value = *((uint8_t *)(mbuf->buf_addr)+i);
if (value != tmp_src_buf[i]) {
snprintf(test_msg, BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_MSG_LEN,
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-04 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 6:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-06-19 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-06-21 14:24 ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-22 6:52 ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-22 10:03 ` Akhil Goyal
2018-06-26 10:12 ` Doherty, Declan
2018-06-28 2:56 ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-28 11:41 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-06-28 11:59 ` Joseph, Anoob
2018-06-19 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-06-28 11:42 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-04 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 10:26 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 10:50 ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 11:07 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:16 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 11:48 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 12:23 ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 13:27 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 14:08 ` Anoob Joseph
2018-07-04 13:55 ` Anoob Joseph [this message]
2018-07-10 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: add min headroom and tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] app/crypto-perf: honour cryptodev's min headroom/tailroom Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/crypto: skip validation of head/tailroom used by PMD Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] crypto/scheduler: add minimum head/tailroom requirement Anoob Joseph
2018-07-10 17:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] add head/tailroom requirement for crypto PMDs De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-07-10 17:29 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530712550-18099-4-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=ankur.dwivedi@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).