From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA75F8001 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:12:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so1308494wiv.7 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:22:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=uy9Je72jikHDoc3FaprYl7aWrV4cgf6aRa0ZcC4sIuU=; b=d8C+HgvUl5+Q1l9/M8bIwf6INgd5cNz79f1He8llVKFt+BjmuhMs9S4ZG5GiPellgQ xrWYrUAYjsEP3JRDNrDeayJ2+EZxygWGkeLU8hD3+iBcMTv8/4ONdLN6Ny+5MRyfH8/t bD+plLcrI31thZlGfjFX6YWr1wpSosyfADsgJEXDNYohXxJrnD5wsbDvZmNI9zGZBInq 5J3ezQ82lJLIDfClw+yXsmin+/9DgMwBO4w5DkNQwC/6aIbZsGD5ultWBh9qZtC4cQUK Nxk2zUtXqbH8tj4cX3gd1zJn/ZwGC4VktxmHaM2DGVRNKnB9EKVtItjmFhxyXkX03SiP JmNw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkv/Aiw+NDqZd1Dk5sJYcWXbU6xOeN8xsWVitC0GW+AHbyOaA7Le9fIpDl6iVIjo1IQIpcf X-Received: by 10.181.13.80 with SMTP id ew16mr30443970wid.47.1416223355986; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm14825006wiz.17.2014.11.17.03.22.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:22:35 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:22:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1536588.MUxmeFqKeH@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/3.17.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20141117111919.GA17886@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1405024369-30058-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <1958929.j3reG6p4bY@xps13> <20141117111919.GA17886@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John Linville Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] librte_pmd_packet: add PMD for AF_PACKET-based virtual devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:12:19 -0000 2014-11-17 06:19, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2014-11-13 06:14, Neil Horman: > > > Do you have an example set of tests that the other pmd's have followed for this? > > > > You can check this: > > http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/tree/test_plans/pmd_test_plan.rst > > http://dpdk.org/browse/tools/dts/tree/test_plans/pmd_bonded_test_plan.rst > > > Looking at this, the pmd_test_plan above seems perfectly applicable to Johns > pmd. did you feel as though additional tests were needed for a virutal pmd > (asside from a note describing the additional --vdev parameter required for > virtual device setup? It's maybe sufficient. I didn't dig enough. We'll see wether some people need more for validation. > I'll have a renamed device pmd patch up later today. Excellent. Thanks -- Thomas