DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	"Sharma, Vivek" <Vivek.Sharma@cavium.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: use correct data type for bitmap slab operations
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:53:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537869163-3650-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537803523-23347-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>

Currently, slab operations use unsigned long data type for 64-bit slab
related operations. On target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc', unsigned long
is 32-bit and thus, slab operations breaks on this target. Changing slab
operations to use unsigned long long for correct functioning on
all targets.

Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
Fixes: 693f715da45c ("remove extra parentheses in return statement")
CC: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
---
v1-->v2:
* Added Acked-by:
* check-git-log.sh fixes.

 lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 14 +++++++-------
 test/test/test_bitmap.c                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
index d9facc6..7a36ce7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ __rte_bitmap_index1_inc(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 static inline uint64_t
 __rte_bitmap_mask1_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 {
-	return (~1lu) << bmp->offset1;
+	return (~1llu) << bmp->offset1;
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ rte_bitmap_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	index2 = pos >> RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2;
 	offset2 = pos & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
-	return (*slab2) & (1lu << offset2);
+	return (*slab2) & (1llu << offset2);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ rte_bitmap_set(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
 
-	*slab2 |= 1lu << offset2;
-	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
+	*slab2 |= 1llu << offset2;
+	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ rte_bitmap_set_slab(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos, uint64_t slab)
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
 
 	*slab2 |= slab;
-	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
+	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
 }
 
 static inline uint64_t
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
 
 	/* Return if array2 slab is not all-zeros */
-	*slab2 &= ~(1lu << offset2);
+	*slab2 &= ~(1llu << offset2);
 	if (*slab2){
 		return;
 	}
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	index1 = pos >> (RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2 + RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2);
 	offset1 = (pos >> RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2) & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
-	*slab1 &= ~(1lu << offset1);
+	*slab1 &= ~(1llu << offset1);
 
 	return;
 }
diff --git a/test/test/test_bitmap.c b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
index c3169e9..95c5184 100644
--- a/test/test/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ test_bitmap_slab_set_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 static int
 test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 {
+	uint64_t val;
 	int i;
 
 	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
@@ -124,6 +125,23 @@ test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 		}
 	}
 
+	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
+
+	/* Alternate slab set test */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
+		if (i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE)
+			rte_bitmap_set(bmp, i);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
+		val = rte_bitmap_get(bmp, i);
+		if (((i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && !val) ||
+		    (!(i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && val)) {
+			printf("Failed to get set bit.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return TEST_SUCCESS;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1537803523-23347-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
2018-09-24 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for " Vivek Sharma
2018-09-24 17:12   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-10-08 15:57     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-09-25  9:53 ` Vivek Sharma [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1537869163-3650-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=Vivek.Sharma@cavium.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).