* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support
@ 2018-11-27 15:20 Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] " Eelco Chaudron
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-27 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cristian.dumitrescu; +Cc: dev
This patch adds support for RFC4115 trTCM meters.
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Eelco Chaudron (3):
lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support
test/test_meter: update meter test to include RFC4115 meters
lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
lib/librte_meter/Makefile | 2
lib/librte_meter/meson.build | 2
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c | 40 ++++++
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map | 9 +
test/test/test_meter.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support
2018-11-27 15:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support Eelco Chaudron
@ 2018-11-27 15:21 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/test_meter: update meter test to include RFC4115 meters Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function Eelco Chaudron
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-27 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cristian.dumitrescu; +Cc: dev
This patch adds support for RFC4115 trTCM meters.
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
---
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c | 40 +++++++++
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
index 473f69aba..aeeac69fe 100644
--- a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
+++ b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
@@ -110,3 +110,43 @@ rte_meter_trtcm_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
return 0;
}
+
+int
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_params *params)
+{
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_tsc_hz();
+
+ /* Check input parameters */
+ if ((p == NULL) ||
+ (params == NULL) ||
+ (params->cir != 0 && params->cbs == 0) ||
+ (params->eir != 0 && params->ebs == 0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Initialize trTCM run-time structure */
+ p->cbs = params->cbs;
+ p->ebs = params->ebs;
+ rte_meter_get_tb_params(hz, params->cir, &p->cir_period,
+ &p->cir_bytes_per_period);
+ rte_meter_get_tb_params(hz, params->eir, &p->eir_period,
+ &p->eir_bytes_per_period);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p)
+{
+ /* Check input parameters */
+ if ((m == NULL) || (p == NULL))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Initialize trTCM run-time structure */
+ m->time_tc = m->time_te = rte_get_tsc_cycles();
+ m->tc = p->cbs;
+ m->te = p->ebs;
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h
index 58a051583..ff1ca3f77 100644
--- a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h
+++ b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern "C" {
* Traffic metering algorithms:
* 1. Single Rate Three Color Marker (srTCM): defined by IETF RFC 2697
* 2. Two Rate Three Color Marker (trTCM): defined by IETF RFC 2698
+ * 3. Two Rate Three Color Marker (trTCM): defined by IETF RFC 4115
*
***/
@@ -43,14 +44,25 @@ struct rte_meter_srtcm_params {
uint64_t ebs; /**< Excess Burst Size (EBS). Measured in bytes. */
};
-/** trTCM parameters per metered traffic flow. The CIR, PIR, CBS and PBS parameters
-only count bytes of IP packets and do not include link specific headers. PIR has to
-be greater than or equal to CIR. Both CBS or EBS have to be greater than zero. */
+/** trTCM parameters per metered traffic flow. The CIR, PIR/EIT, CBS and PBS/EBS
+parameters only count bytes of IP packets and do not include link specific
+headers.
+
+- For RFC2698 operations PIR has to be greater than or equal to CIR. Both CBS
+ or EBS have to be greater than zero.
+- For RFC4115 operations CBS and EBS need to be greater than zero if CIR and
+ EIR are none-zero respectively.*/
struct rte_meter_trtcm_params {
uint64_t cir; /**< Committed Information Rate (CIR). Measured in bytes per second. */
- uint64_t pir; /**< Peak Information Rate (PIR). Measured in bytes per second. */
- uint64_t cbs; /**< Committed Burst Size (CBS). Measured in byes. */
- uint64_t pbs; /**< Peak Burst Size (PBS). Measured in bytes. */
+ union {
+ uint64_t pir; /**< Peak Information Rate (PIR). Measured in bytes per second. */
+ uint64_t eir; /**< Excess Information Rate (EIR). Measured in bytes per second. */
+ };
+ uint64_t cbs; /**< Committed Burst Size (CBS). Measured in bytes. */
+ union {
+ uint64_t pbs; /**< Peak Burst Size (PBS). Measured in bytes. */
+ uint64_t ebs; /**< Excess Burst Size (EBS). Measured in bytes. */
+ };
};
/**
@@ -98,6 +110,19 @@ rte_meter_srtcm_profile_config(struct rte_meter_srtcm_profile *p,
int
rte_meter_trtcm_profile_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
struct rte_meter_trtcm_params *params);
+/**
+ * trTCM RFC 4115 profile configuration
+ *
+ * @param p
+ * Pointer to pre-allocated trTCM profile data structure
+ * @param params
+ * trTCM profile parameters
+ * @return
+ * 0 upon success, error code otherwise
+ */
+int
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_params *params);
/**
* srTCM configuration per metered traffic flow
@@ -127,6 +152,20 @@ int
rte_meter_trtcm_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p);
+/**
+ * trTCM RFC 4115 configuration per metered traffic flow
+ *
+ * @param m
+ * Pointer to pre-allocated trTCM data structure
+ * @param p
+ * trTCM profile. Needs to be valid.
+ * @return
+ * 0 upon success, error code otherwise
+ */
+int
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p);
+
/**
* srTCM color blind traffic metering
*
@@ -213,6 +252,49 @@ rte_meter_trtcm_color_aware_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
uint32_t pkt_len,
enum rte_meter_color pkt_color);
+/**
+ * trTCM RFC4115 color blind traffic metering
+ *
+ * @param m
+ * Handle to trTCM instance
+ * @param p
+ * trTCM profile specified at trTCM object creation time
+ * @param time
+ * Current CPU time stamp (measured in CPU cycles)
+ * @param pkt_len
+ * Length of the current IP packet (measured in bytes)
+ * @return
+ * Color assigned to the current IP packet
+ */
+static inline enum rte_meter_color
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ uint64_t time,
+ uint32_t pkt_len);
+
+/**
+ * trTCM RFC4115 color aware traffic metering
+ *
+ * @param m
+ * Handle to trTCM instance
+ * @param p
+ * trTCM profile specified at trTCM object creation time
+ * @param time
+ * Current CPU time stamp (measured in CPU cycles)
+ * @param pkt_len
+ * Length of the current IP packet (measured in bytes)
+ * @param pkt_color
+ * Input color of the current IP packet
+ * @return
+ * Color assigned to the current IP packet
+ */
+static inline enum rte_meter_color
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ uint64_t time,
+ uint32_t pkt_len,
+ enum rte_meter_color pkt_color);
+
/*
* Inline implementation of run-time methods
*
@@ -239,16 +321,28 @@ struct rte_meter_srtcm {
struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile {
uint64_t cbs;
/**< Upper limit for C token bucket */
- uint64_t pbs;
- /**< Upper limit for P token bucket */
+ union {
+ uint64_t pbs;
+ /**< Upper limit for P token bucket */
+ uint64_t ebs;
+ /**< Upper limit for E token bucket */
+ };
uint64_t cir_period;
/**< Number of CPU cycles for one update of C token bucket */
uint64_t cir_bytes_per_period;
/**< Number of bytes to add to C token bucket on each update */
- uint64_t pir_period;
- /**< Number of CPU cycles for one update of P token bucket */
- uint64_t pir_bytes_per_period;
- /**< Number of bytes to add to P token bucket on each update */
+ union {
+ uint64_t pir_period;
+ /**< Number of CPU cycles for one update of P token bucket */
+ uint64_t eir_period;
+ /**< Number of CPU cycles for one update of E token bucket */
+ };
+ union {
+ uint64_t pir_bytes_per_period;
+ /**< Number of bytes to add to P token bucket on each update */
+ uint64_t eir_bytes_per_period;
+ /**< Number of bytes to add to E token bucket on each update */
+ };
};
/**
@@ -258,12 +352,20 @@ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile {
struct rte_meter_trtcm {
uint64_t time_tc;
/**< Time of latest update of C token bucket */
- uint64_t time_tp;
- /**< Time of latest update of E token bucket */
+ union {
+ uint64_t time_tp;
+ /**< Time of latest update of P token bucket */
+ uint64_t time_te;
+ /**< Time of latest update of E token bucket */
+ };
uint64_t tc;
/**< Number of bytes currently available in committed(C) token bucket */
- uint64_t tp;
- /**< Number of bytes currently available in the peak(P) token bucket */
+ union {
+ uint64_t tp;
+ /**< Number of bytes currently available in the peak(P) token bucket */
+ uint64_t te;
+ /**< Number of bytes currently available in the excess(E) token bucket */
+ };
};
static inline enum rte_meter_color
@@ -434,6 +536,65 @@ rte_meter_trtcm_color_aware_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
return e_RTE_METER_GREEN;
}
+static inline enum rte_meter_color
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ uint64_t time,
+ uint32_t pkt_len)
+{
+ return rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(m, p, time, pkt_len,
+ e_RTE_METER_GREEN);
+}
+
+static inline enum rte_meter_color
+rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(struct rte_meter_trtcm *m,
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile *p,
+ uint64_t time,
+ uint32_t pkt_len,
+ enum rte_meter_color pkt_color)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff_tc, time_diff_te, n_periods_tc, n_periods_te, tc, te;
+
+ /* Bucket update */
+ time_diff_tc = time - m->time_tc;
+ time_diff_te = time - m->time_te;
+ n_periods_tc = time_diff_tc / p->cir_period;
+ n_periods_te = time_diff_te / p->eir_period;
+ m->time_tc += n_periods_tc * p->cir_period;
+ m->time_te += n_periods_te * p->eir_period;
+
+ tc = m->tc + n_periods_tc * p->cir_bytes_per_period;
+ if (tc > p->cbs)
+ tc = p->cbs;
+
+ te = m->te + n_periods_te * p->eir_bytes_per_period;
+ if (te > p->ebs)
+ te = p->ebs;
+
+ /* Color logic */
+ if (pkt_color == e_RTE_METER_GREEN) {
+ if (tc >= pkt_len) {
+ m->tc = tc - pkt_len;
+ m->te = te;
+ return e_RTE_METER_GREEN;
+ } else if (te >= pkt_len) {
+ m->tc = tc;
+ m->te = te - pkt_len;
+ return e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ }
+ } else if (pkt_color == e_RTE_METER_YELLOW && te >= pkt_len) {
+ m->tc = tc;
+ m->te = te - pkt_len;
+ return e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ }
+
+ /* If we end up here the color is RED */
+ m->tc = tc;
+ m->te = te;
+ return e_RTE_METER_RED;
+}
+
+
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/test_meter: update meter test to include RFC4115 meters
2018-11-27 15:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] " Eelco Chaudron
@ 2018-11-27 15:21 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function Eelco Chaudron
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-27 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cristian.dumitrescu; +Cc: dev
Add test cases for RFC4115 meters
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
---
test/test/test_meter.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 212 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/test/test_meter.c b/test/test/test_meter.c
index 8bb47e75c..097da0143 100644
--- a/test/test/test_meter.c
+++ b/test/test/test_meter.c
@@ -32,8 +32,10 @@
#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_CIR_DF 46000000
#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_PIR_DF 69000000
+#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_EIR_DF 69000000
#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF 2048
#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_PBS_DF 4096
+#define TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF 4096
static struct rte_meter_srtcm_params sparams =
{.cir = TM_TEST_SRTCM_CIR_DF,
@@ -46,6 +48,12 @@ static struct rte_meter_trtcm_params tparams=
.cbs = TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF,
.pbs = TM_TEST_TRTCM_PBS_DF,};
+static struct rte_meter_trtcm_params rfc4115params =
+ {.cir = TM_TEST_TRTCM_CIR_DF,
+ .eir = TM_TEST_TRTCM_EIR_DF,
+ .cbs = TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF,
+ .ebs = TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF,};
+
/**
* functional test for rte_meter_srtcm_config
*/
@@ -148,6 +156,45 @@ tm_test_trtcm_config(void)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * functional test for rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config
+ */
+static inline int
+tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_config(void)
+{
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile tp;
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_params rfc4115params1;
+#define TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG "trtcm_rfc4115_config"
+
+ /* invalid parameter test */
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(NULL, NULL) == 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, NULL) == 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(NULL, &rfc4115params) == 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+
+ /*
+ * cbs and pbs should be none-zero if cir and eir are none-zero
+ * respectively
+ */
+ rfc4115params1 = rfc4115params;
+ rfc4115params1.cbs = 0;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params1) == 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+
+ rfc4115params1 = rfc4115params;
+ rfc4115params1.pbs = 0;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params1) == 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+
+ /* usual parameter, should be successful */
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_CFG_MSG);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* functional test for rte_meter_srtcm_color_blind_check
*/
@@ -265,6 +312,65 @@ tm_test_trtcm_color_blind_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * functional test for rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check
+ */
+static inline int
+tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(void)
+{
+#define TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG "trtcm_rfc4115_blind_check"
+
+ uint64_t time;
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile tp;
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm tm;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_tsc_hz();
+
+ /* Test green */
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF - 1)
+ != e_RTE_METER_GREEN)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG" GREEN");
+
+ /* Test yellow */
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF + 1)
+ != e_RTE_METER_YELLOW)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG" YELLOW");
+
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF - 1)
+ != e_RTE_METER_YELLOW)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG" YELLOW");
+
+ /* Test red */
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF + 1)
+ != e_RTE_METER_RED)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_BLIND_CHECK_MSG" RED");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* @in[4] : the flags packets carries.
@@ -473,6 +579,103 @@ tm_test_trtcm_color_aware_check(void)
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * @in[4] : the flags packets carries.
+ * @in[4] : the flags function expect to return.
+ * It will do blind check at the time of 1 second from beginning.
+ * At the time, it will use packets length of cbs -1, cbs + 1,
+ * ebs -1 and ebs +1 with flag in[0], in[1], in[2] and in[3] to do
+ * aware check, expect flag out[0], out[1], out[2] and out[3]
+ */
+static inline int
+tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_aware_check
+(enum rte_meter_color in[4], enum rte_meter_color out[4])
+{
+#define TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG "trtcm_rfc4115_aware_check"
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm_profile tp;
+ struct rte_meter_trtcm tm;
+ uint64_t time;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_tsc_hz();
+
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF - 1, in[0]) != out[0])
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG" %u:%u", in[0], out[0]);
+
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_CBS_DF + 1, in[1]) != out[1])
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG" %u:%u", in[1], out[1]);
+
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF - 1, in[2]) != out[2])
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG" %u:%u", in[2], out[2]);
+
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config(&tp, &rfc4115params) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config(&tm, &tp) != 0)
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG);
+ time = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + hz;
+ if (rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(
+ &tm, &tp, time, TM_TEST_TRTCM_EBS_DF + 1, in[3]) != out[3])
+ melog(TRTCM_RFC4115_AWARE_CHECK_MSG" %u:%u", in[3], out[3]);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * functional test for rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check
+ */
+static inline int
+tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check(void)
+{
+ enum rte_meter_color in[4], out[4];
+ /**
+ * test 4 points that will produce green, yellow, yellow, red flag
+ * if using blind check
+ */
+
+ /* previouly have a green, test points should keep unchanged */
+ in[0] = in[1] = in[2] = in[3] = e_RTE_METER_GREEN;
+ out[0] = e_RTE_METER_GREEN;
+ out[1] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[2] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[3] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_aware_check(in, out) != 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ in[0] = in[1] = in[2] = in[3] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[0] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[1] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[2] = e_RTE_METER_YELLOW;
+ out[3] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_aware_check(in, out) != 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ in[0] = in[1] = in[2] = in[3] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ out[0] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ out[1] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ out[2] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ out[3] = e_RTE_METER_RED;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_aware_check(in, out) != 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* test main entrance for library meter
*/
@@ -485,18 +688,27 @@ test_meter(void)
if (tm_test_trtcm_config() != 0)
return -1;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_config() != 0)
+ return -1;
+
if (tm_test_srtcm_color_blind_check() != 0)
return -1;
if (tm_test_trtcm_color_blind_check() != 0)
return -1;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check() != 0)
+ return -1;
+
if (tm_test_srtcm_color_aware_check() != 0)
return -1;
if (tm_test_trtcm_color_aware_check() != 0)
return -1;
+ if (tm_test_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check() != 0)
+ return -1;
+
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
2018-11-27 15:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] " Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/test_meter: update meter test to include RFC4115 meters Eelco Chaudron
@ 2018-11-27 15:21 ` Eelco Chaudron
[not found] ` <CAJFAV8zUyBqEovvaChs3TO+Ah15T3davXPPkpDzzE2-fMQGD2g@mail.gmail.com>
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-27 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cristian.dumitrescu; +Cc: dev
Update the ABI to include the new RFC4115 meter functions
---
lib/librte_meter/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_meter/meson.build | 2 +-
lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
index 2dc071e8e..79ad79744 100644
--- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
+++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
EXPORT_MAP := rte_meter_version.map
-LIBABIVER := 2
+LIBABIVER := 3
#
# all source are stored in SRCS-y
diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/meson.build b/lib/librte_meter/meson.build
index 947bc19e2..422123e20 100644
--- a/lib/librte_meter/meson.build
+++ b/lib/librte_meter/meson.build
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
# Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation
-version = 2
+version = 3
sources = files('rte_meter.c')
headers = files('rte_meter.h')
diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map
index cb79f0c2b..4b460d580 100644
--- a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map
@@ -17,3 +17,12 @@ DPDK_18.08 {
rte_meter_srtcm_profile_config;
rte_meter_trtcm_profile_config;
};
+
+EXPERIMENTAL {
+ global:
+
+ rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_aware_check;
+ rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check;
+ rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_config;
+ rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_profile_config;
+};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
[not found] ` <CAJFAV8zUyBqEovvaChs3TO+Ah15T3davXPPkpDzzE2-fMQGD2g@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2018-11-28 9:27 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-28 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-28 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand; +Cc: cristian.dumitrescu, dev
On 28 Nov 2018, at 9:38, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Eelco,
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:22 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Update the ABI to include the new RFC4115 meter functions
>> ---
>> lib/librte_meter/Makefile | 2 +-
>> lib/librte_meter/meson.build | 2 +-
>> lib/librte_meter/rte_meter_version.map | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>> index 2dc071e8e..79ad79744 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
>>
>> EXPORT_MAP := rte_meter_version.map
>>
>> -LIBABIVER := 2
>> +LIBABIVER := 3
>>
>> #
>> # all source are stored in SRCS-y
>>
>
> As far as I understood the policy around the EXPERIMENTAL section, you
> don't need to bump the library version.
Thought I would add the new function as none experimental, i.e. next
version, but checkpatch did not allow me to do this.
Tried to find info on what the right process was, as these functions are
just another meter implementation using similar existing APIs. If anyone
has any background on this please point me to it.
I changed the library version as an existing data structure changed
(which in theory should not change the location of the data), but the
ABI check popped warnings so I decided to increase the version.
>
> + you should squash this into the first patch.
I’ll do this on the next version.
Thanks,
Eelco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
2018-11-28 9:27 ` Eelco Chaudron
@ 2018-11-28 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-28 12:40 ` Eelco Chaudron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-11-28 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eelco Chaudron; +Cc: dev, David Marchand, cristian.dumitrescu
28/11/2018 10:27, Eelco Chaudron:
> On 28 Nov 2018, at 9:38, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:22 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >> --- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
> >> -LIBABIVER := 2
> >> +LIBABIVER := 3
> >
> > As far as I understood the policy around the EXPERIMENTAL section, you
> > don't need to bump the library version.
>
> Thought I would add the new function as none experimental, i.e. next
> version, but checkpatch did not allow me to do this.
>
> Tried to find info on what the right process was, as these functions are
> just another meter implementation using similar existing APIs. If anyone
> has any background on this please point me to it.
It is documented here:
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/versioning.html
The case for "similar API" is not handled specifically so far.
So you need to introduce it as experimental.
> I changed the library version as an existing data structure changed
> (which in theory should not change the location of the data), but the
> ABI check popped warnings so I decided to increase the version.
It deserves to analyze why the ABI check raises a warning.
If it really needs to bump the ABI version, you should justify it
in the commit message, and explain what changed in the ABI section
of the release notes, plus update the version in the release notes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
2018-11-28 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-11-28 12:40 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-28 12:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-28 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev, David Marchand, cristian.dumitrescu
On 28 Nov 2018, at 11:09, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/11/2018 10:27, Eelco Chaudron:
>> On 28 Nov 2018, at 9:38, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:22 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>>>> -LIBABIVER := 2
>>>> +LIBABIVER := 3
>>>
>>> As far as I understood the policy around the EXPERIMENTAL section,
>>> you
>>> don't need to bump the library version.
>>
>> Thought I would add the new function as none experimental, i.e. next
>> version, but checkpatch did not allow me to do this.
>>
>> Tried to find info on what the right process was, as these functions
>> are
>> just another meter implementation using similar existing APIs. If
>> anyone
>> has any background on this please point me to it.
>
> It is documented here:
> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/versioning.html
>
> The case for "similar API" is not handled specifically so far.
> So you need to introduce it as experimental.
Thanks for the clarification, will update the APIs with
__rte_experimental in the next iteration.
>> I changed the library version as an existing data structure changed
>> (which in theory should not change the location of the data), but the
>> ABI check popped warnings so I decided to increase the version.
>
> It deserves to analyze why the ABI check raises a warning.
> If it really needs to bump the ABI version, you should justify it
> in the commit message, and explain what changed in the ABI section
> of the release notes, plus update the version in the release notes.
Will look at it more closely and update it for the next iteration.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
2018-11-28 12:40 ` Eelco Chaudron
@ 2018-11-28 12:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-28 13:17 ` Eelco Chaudron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-11-28 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eelco Chaudron; +Cc: dev, David Marchand, cristian.dumitrescu
28/11/2018 13:40, Eelco Chaudron:
>
> On 28 Nov 2018, at 11:09, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> > 28/11/2018 10:27, Eelco Chaudron:
> >> On 28 Nov 2018, at 9:38, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:22 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> --- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
> >>>> -LIBABIVER := 2
> >>>> +LIBABIVER := 3
> >>>
> >>> As far as I understood the policy around the EXPERIMENTAL section,
> >>> you
> >>> don't need to bump the library version.
> >>
> >> Thought I would add the new function as none experimental, i.e. next
> >> version, but checkpatch did not allow me to do this.
> >>
> >> Tried to find info on what the right process was, as these functions
> >> are
> >> just another meter implementation using similar existing APIs. If
> >> anyone
> >> has any background on this please point me to it.
> >
> > It is documented here:
> > http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/versioning.html
> >
> > The case for "similar API" is not handled specifically so far.
> > So you need to introduce it as experimental.
>
> Thanks for the clarification, will update the APIs with
> __rte_experimental in the next iteration.
You should also add this on top of the doxygen comment:
* @warning
* @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function
2018-11-28 12:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-11-28 13:17 ` Eelco Chaudron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2018-11-28 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev, David Marchand, cristian.dumitrescu
On 28 Nov 2018, at 13:51, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/11/2018 13:40, Eelco Chaudron:
>>
>> On 28 Nov 2018, at 11:09, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>
>>> 28/11/2018 10:27, Eelco Chaudron:
>>>> On 28 Nov 2018, at 9:38, David Marchand wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:22 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/Makefile
>>>>>> -LIBABIVER := 2
>>>>>> +LIBABIVER := 3
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I understood the policy around the EXPERIMENTAL section,
>>>>> you
>>>>> don't need to bump the library version.
>>>>
>>>> Thought I would add the new function as none experimental, i.e. next
>>>> version, but checkpatch did not allow me to do this.
>>>>
>>>> Tried to find info on what the right process was, as these functions
>>>> are
>>>> just another meter implementation using similar existing APIs. If
>>>> anyone
>>>> has any background on this please point me to it.
>>>
>>> It is documented here:
>>> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/versioning.html
>>>
>>> The case for "similar API" is not handled specifically so far.
>>> So you need to introduce it as experimental.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification, will update the APIs with
>> __rte_experimental in the next iteration.
>
> You should also add this on top of the doxygen comment:
>
> * @warning
> * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
Thanks, done!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-28 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-27 15:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lib/librte_meter: add RFC4115 trTCM meter support Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] " Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] test/test_meter: update meter test to include RFC4115 meters Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lib/librte_meter: update abi to include new rfc4115 function Eelco Chaudron
[not found] ` <CAJFAV8zUyBqEovvaChs3TO+Ah15T3davXPPkpDzzE2-fMQGD2g@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-28 9:27 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-28 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-28 12:40 ` Eelco Chaudron
2018-11-28 12:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-28 13:17 ` Eelco Chaudron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).