From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679241B586 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:07:30 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2018 10:07:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,373,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="111877009" Received: from sivswdev08.ir.intel.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.237.217.47]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2018 10:07:28 -0800 From: Konstantin Ananyev To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Konstantin Ananyev Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:07:17 +0000 Message-Id: <1545242837-28585-3-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7 In-Reply-To: <1542130061-3702-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <1542130061-3702-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test: add new test-cases for rwlock autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:07:31 -0000 Add few functional and perfomance tests for rte_rwlock_read_trylock() and rte_rwlock_write_trylock(). Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu --- test/test/test_rwlock.c | 409 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 390 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/test/test_rwlock.c b/test/test/test_rwlock.c index 29171c422..224f0dea8 100644 --- a/test/test/test_rwlock.c +++ b/test/test/test_rwlock.c @@ -4,8 +4,10 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -22,29 +24,45 @@ /* * rwlock test * =========== - * - * - There is a global rwlock and a table of rwlocks (one per lcore). - * - * - The test function takes all of these locks and launches the - * ``test_rwlock_per_core()`` function on each core (except the master). - * - * - The function takes the global write lock, display something, - * then releases the global lock. - * - Then, it takes the per-lcore write lock, display something, and - * releases the per-core lock. - * - Finally, a read lock is taken during 100 ms, then released. - * - * - The main function unlocks the per-lcore locks sequentially and - * waits between each lock. This triggers the display of a message - * for each core, in the correct order. - * - * Then, it tries to take the global write lock and display the last - * message. The autotest script checks that the message order is correct. + * Provides UT for rte_rwlock API. + * Main concern is on functional testing, but also provides some + * performance measurements. + * Obviously for proper testing need to be executed with more than one lcore. */ +#define ITER_NUM 0x80 + +#define TEST_SEC 5 + static rte_rwlock_t sl; static rte_rwlock_t sl_tab[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; +enum { + LC_TYPE_RDLOCK, + LC_TYPE_WRLOCK, +}; + +static struct { + rte_rwlock_t lock; + uint64_t tick; + volatile union { + uint8_t u8[RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE]; + uint64_t u64[RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(uint64_t)]; + } data; +} __rte_cache_aligned try_rwlock_data; + +struct try_rwlock_lcore { + int32_t rc; + int32_t type; + struct { + uint64_t tick; + uint64_t fail; + uint64_t success; + } stat; +} __rte_cache_aligned; + +static struct try_rwlock_lcore try_lcore_data[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; + static int test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) { @@ -65,8 +83,27 @@ test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) return 0; } +/* + * - There is a global rwlock and a table of rwlocks (one per lcore). + * + * - The test function takes all of these locks and launches the + * ``test_rwlock_per_core()`` function on each core (except the master). + * + * - The function takes the global write lock, display something, + * then releases the global lock. + * - Then, it takes the per-lcore write lock, display something, and + * releases the per-core lock. + * - Finally, a read lock is taken during 100 ms, then released. + * + * - The main function unlocks the per-lcore locks sequentially and + * waits between each lock. This triggers the display of a message + * for each core, in the correct order. + * + * Then, it tries to take the global write lock and display the last + * message. The autotest script checks that the message order is correct. + */ static int -test_rwlock(void) +rwlock_test1(void) { int i; @@ -98,4 +135,338 @@ test_rwlock(void) return 0; } +static int +try_read(uint32_t lc) +{ + int32_t rc; + uint32_t i; + + rc = rte_rwlock_read_trylock(&try_rwlock_data.lock); + if (rc != 0) + return rc; + + for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(try_rwlock_data.data.u64); i++) { + + /* race condition occurred, lock doesn't work properly */ + if (try_rwlock_data.data.u64[i] != 0) { + printf("%s(%u) error: unexpected data pattern\n", + __func__, lc); + rte_memdump(stdout, NULL, + (void *)(uintptr_t)&try_rwlock_data.data, + sizeof(try_rwlock_data.data)); + rc = -EFAULT; + break; + } + } + + rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&try_rwlock_data.lock); + return rc; +} + +static int +try_write(uint32_t lc) +{ + int32_t rc; + uint32_t i, v; + + v = RTE_MAX(lc % UINT8_MAX, 1U); + + rc = rte_rwlock_write_trylock(&try_rwlock_data.lock); + if (rc != 0) + return rc; + + /* update by bytes in reverese order */ + for (i = RTE_DIM(try_rwlock_data.data.u8); i-- != 0; ) { + + /* race condition occurred, lock doesn't work properly */ + if (try_rwlock_data.data.u8[i] != 0) { + printf("%s:%d(%u) error: unexpected data pattern\n", + __func__, __LINE__, lc); + rte_memdump(stdout, NULL, + (void *)(uintptr_t)&try_rwlock_data.data, + sizeof(try_rwlock_data.data)); + rc = -EFAULT; + break; + } + + try_rwlock_data.data.u8[i] = v; + } + + /* restore by bytes in reverese order */ + for (i = RTE_DIM(try_rwlock_data.data.u8); i-- != 0; ) { + + /* race condition occurred, lock doesn't work properly */ + if (try_rwlock_data.data.u8[i] != v) { + printf("%s:%d(%u) error: unexpected data pattern\n", + __func__, __LINE__, lc); + rte_memdump(stdout, NULL, + (void *)(uintptr_t)&try_rwlock_data.data, + sizeof(try_rwlock_data.data)); + rc = -EFAULT; + break; + } + + try_rwlock_data.data.u8[i] = 0; + } + + rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&try_rwlock_data.lock); + return rc; +} + +static int +try_read_lcore(__rte_unused void *data) +{ + int32_t rc; + uint32_t i, lc; + uint64_t ftm, stm, tm; + struct try_rwlock_lcore *lcd; + + lc = rte_lcore_id(); + lcd = try_lcore_data + lc; + lcd->type = LC_TYPE_RDLOCK; + + ftm = try_rwlock_data.tick; + stm = rte_get_timer_cycles(); + + do { + for (i = 0; i != ITER_NUM; i++) { + rc = try_read(lc); + if (rc == 0) + lcd->stat.success++; + else if (rc == -EBUSY) + lcd->stat.fail++; + else + break; + rc = 0; + } + tm = rte_get_timer_cycles() - stm; + } while (tm < ftm && rc == 0); + + lcd->rc = rc; + lcd->stat.tick = tm; + return rc; +} + +static int +try_write_lcore(__rte_unused void *data) +{ + int32_t rc; + uint32_t i, lc; + uint64_t ftm, stm, tm; + struct try_rwlock_lcore *lcd; + + lc = rte_lcore_id(); + lcd = try_lcore_data + lc; + lcd->type = LC_TYPE_WRLOCK; + + ftm = try_rwlock_data.tick; + stm = rte_get_timer_cycles(); + + do { + for (i = 0; i != ITER_NUM; i++) { + rc = try_write(lc); + if (rc == 0) + lcd->stat.success++; + else if (rc == -EBUSY) + lcd->stat.fail++; + else + break; + rc = 0; + } + tm = rte_get_timer_cycles() - stm; + } while (tm < ftm && rc == 0); + + lcd->rc = rc; + lcd->stat.tick = tm; + return rc; +} + +static void +print_try_lcore_stats(const struct try_rwlock_lcore *tlc, uint32_t lc) +{ + uint64_t f, s; + + f = RTE_MAX(tlc->stat.fail, 1ULL); + s = RTE_MAX(tlc->stat.success, 1ULL); + + printf("try_lcore_data[%u]={\n" + "\trc=%d,\n" + "\ttype=%s,\n" + "\tfail=%" PRIu64 ",\n" + "\tsuccess=%" PRIu64 ",\n" + "\tcycles=%" PRIu64 ",\n" + "\tcycles/op=%#Lf,\n" + "\tcycles/success=%#Lf,\n" + "\tsuccess/fail=%#Lf,\n" + "};\n", + lc, + tlc->rc, + tlc->type == LC_TYPE_RDLOCK ? "RDLOCK" : "WRLOCK", + tlc->stat.fail, + tlc->stat.success, + tlc->stat.tick, + (long double)tlc->stat.tick / + (tlc->stat.fail + tlc->stat.success), + (long double)tlc->stat.tick / s, + (long double)tlc->stat.success / f); +} + +static void +collect_try_lcore_stats(struct try_rwlock_lcore *tlc, + const struct try_rwlock_lcore *lc) +{ + tlc->stat.tick += lc->stat.tick; + tlc->stat.fail += lc->stat.fail; + tlc->stat.success += lc->stat.success; +} + +/* + * Process collected results: + * - check status + * - collect and print statistics + */ +static int +process_try_lcore_stats(void) +{ + int32_t rc; + uint32_t lc, rd, wr; + struct try_rwlock_lcore rlc, wlc; + + memset(&rlc, 0, sizeof(rlc)); + memset(&wlc, 0, sizeof(wlc)); + + rlc.type = LC_TYPE_RDLOCK; + wlc.type = LC_TYPE_WRLOCK; + rd = 0; + wr = 0; + + rc = 0; + RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lc) { + rc |= try_lcore_data[lc].rc; + if (try_lcore_data[lc].type == LC_TYPE_RDLOCK) { + collect_try_lcore_stats(&rlc, try_lcore_data + lc); + rd++; + } else { + collect_try_lcore_stats(&wlc, try_lcore_data + lc); + wr++; + } + } + + if (rc == 0) { + RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lc) + print_try_lcore_stats(try_lcore_data + lc, lc); + + if (rd != 0) { + printf("aggregated stats for %u RDLOCK cores:\n", rd); + print_try_lcore_stats(&rlc, rd); + } + + if (wr != 0) { + printf("aggregated stats for %u WRLOCK cores:\n", wr); + print_try_lcore_stats(&wlc, wr); + } + } + + return rc; +} + +static void +try_test_reset(void) +{ + memset(&try_lcore_data, 0, sizeof(try_lcore_data)); + memset(&try_rwlock_data, 0, sizeof(try_rwlock_data)); + try_rwlock_data.tick = TEST_SEC * rte_get_tsc_hz(); +} + +/* all lcores grab RDLOCK */ +static int +try_rwlock_test_rda(void) +{ + try_test_reset(); + + /* start read test on all avaialble lcores */ + rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(try_read_lcore, NULL, CALL_MASTER); + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + return process_try_lcore_stats(); +} + +/* all slave lcores grab RDLOCK, master one grabs WRLOCK */ +static int +try_rwlock_test_rds_wrm(void) +{ + try_test_reset(); + + rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(try_read_lcore, NULL, SKIP_MASTER); + try_write_lcore(NULL); + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + return process_try_lcore_stats(); +} + +/* master and even slave lcores grab RDLOCK, odd lcores grab WRLOCK */ +static int +try_rwlock_test_rde_wro(void) +{ + uint32_t lc, mlc; + + try_test_reset(); + + mlc = rte_get_master_lcore(); + + RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lc) { + if (lc != mlc) { + if ((lc & 1) == 0) + rte_eal_remote_launch(try_read_lcore, + NULL, lc); + else + rte_eal_remote_launch(try_write_lcore, + NULL, lc); + } + } + try_read_lcore(NULL); + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + return process_try_lcore_stats(); +} + +static int +test_rwlock(void) +{ + uint32_t i; + int32_t rc, ret; + + static const struct { + const char *name; + int (*ftst)(void); + } test[] = { + { + .name = "rwlock_test1", + .ftst = rwlock_test1, + }, + { + .name = "try_rwlock_test_rda", + .ftst = try_rwlock_test_rda, + }, + { + .name = "try_rwlock_test_rds_wrm", + .ftst = try_rwlock_test_rds_wrm, + }, + { + .name = "try_rwlock_test_rde_wro", + .ftst = try_rwlock_test_rde_wro, + }, + }; + + ret = 0; + for (i = 0; i != RTE_DIM(test); i++) { + printf("starting test %s;\n", test[i].name); + rc = test[i].ftst(); + printf("test %s completed with status %d\n", test[i].name, rc); + ret |= rc; + } + + return ret; +} + REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(rwlock_autotest, test_rwlock); -- 2.17.1