From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2CA1518 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:27:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x79so356234149lff.0 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:27:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xh+/6CmdizdEj2mh6LI5AI3fPDtLOEqDLYV+JMNLSVk=; b=okwgJU3tcvPcsqdqJeJW7qlYR6CwYuxS34Q7Skd8jp7GiGJrGBcnaqpvcKbqANQjsX tV1wmHnEG/E2dgMqDb0lWwqEXypXPGNJQqNYbJg3ojF6vsEd7oyKngPQu4W+Qj03EE14 SP47mz0AV0Ge2lcBYscS0ax9609cCkwDPFGGiYiP0YDkRnJ2z3DdNxfJ6Xwd07srXJ92 d+RYhxMwIXqPoNcc+MBkqFT126dd9Ghf9EQj7gFNvtqFX/ZEVe1G97TA1vVJWzWmF3YV CRuhPFq/yQsZuxVj5A0TONGnihrfXRdHjR4yYuR1Jd3wdkEWIDB+XUpW3gxQ5BQbKbEh abQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xh+/6CmdizdEj2mh6LI5AI3fPDtLOEqDLYV+JMNLSVk=; b=DkSgUHBd+mu/Ft/N95jAFRuk63513xgAFrhjZTPE04aHhsAB5+73iIJc9s10TlJAzy tREf3WSzvUVGHbm3q3KnQBAjnp7rMAvyEYm6eodA3xuii3y5Wd8HpNy3r/dGVNVKhcBw yUIpYEXcxwWpCpDkQBMnilPNY2wDzViYYTVofsdpHp4Uw+LA4pb2IjlBFToyNTy7u7P/ X7N5tWWduDRGa+W9oAREKYHg2CKwGXeD5cpxkKtI+OZV+NrAQBSz8T9l+6pqZrTEBebp JoqBdY28otTcqJYcKZZIVJfxI3WNOSTNZ/B68gB3w0KntJ+v6/nDj5FJd0nUHZlViwbq Libw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rk80E47r58oEsW+VhU5G8/NHgkV1fSzocAmN+1kV+4EnuRYr51nqf0AKT0gkCf3mQZm X-Received: by 10.25.198.9 with SMTP id w9mr600659lff.164.1476797249362; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c77sm9392146lfg.13.2016.10.18.06.27.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:27:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob , Dave Neary , "O'Driscoll, Tim" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:27:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1547412.qzivax5BEW@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20161018113401.GA5434@localhost.localdomain> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA675F0B5A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <5805415E.3030102@redhat.com> <20161018113401.GA5434@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:27:30 -0000 2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote: > > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception that we need to address. > > > > I would say that there is still a perception issue, for companies who > > look at the active developers, the owners of the project's resources > > (infra, domain name), and who have heard anecdotal evidence of issues in > > the past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have > > been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with > > the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned > > parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a > > move to the LF. > > +1 How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than "hear concerns" or "heard anecdotal evidence of issues"?