From: gavin hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
gavin.hu@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:54:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547538849-10996-5-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547538849-10996-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181220104246.5590-1-gavin.hu@arm.com>
From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
The __sync builtin based implementation generates full memory barriers
('dmb ish') on Arm platforms. Using C11 atomic builtins to generate one way
barriers.
Here is the assembly code of __sync_compare_and_swap builtin.
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(dst, exp, src);
0x000000000090f1b0 <+16>: e0 07 40 f9 ldr x0, [sp, #8]
0x000000000090f1b4 <+20>: e1 0f 40 79 ldrh w1, [sp, #6]
0x000000000090f1b8 <+24>: e2 0b 40 79 ldrh w2, [sp, #4]
0x000000000090f1bc <+28>: 21 3c 00 12 and w1, w1, #0xffff
0x000000000090f1c0 <+32>: 03 7c 5f 48 ldxrh w3, [x0]
0x000000000090f1c4 <+36>: 7f 00 01 6b cmp w3, w1
0x000000000090f1c8 <+40>: 61 00 00 54 b.ne 0x90f1d4
<rte_atomic16_cmpset+52> // b.any
0x000000000090f1cc <+44>: 02 fc 04 48 stlxrh w4, w2, [x0]
0x000000000090f1d0 <+48>: 84 ff ff 35 cbnz w4, 0x90f1c0
<rte_atomic16_cmpset+32>
0x000000000090f1d4 <+52>: bf 3b 03 d5 dmb ish
0x000000000090f1d8 <+56>: e0 17 9f 1a cset w0, eq // eq = none
The benchmarking results showed 3X performance gain on Cavium ThunderX2 and
13% on Qualcomm Falkor and 3.7% on 4-A72 Marvell macchiatobin.
Here is the example test result on TX2:
*** spinlock_autotest without this patch ***
Core [123] Cost Time = 639822 us
Core [124] Cost Time = 633253 us
Core [125] Cost Time = 646030 us
Core [126] Cost Time = 643189 us
Core [127] Cost Time = 647039 us
Total Cost Time = 95433298 us
*** spinlock_autotest with this patch ***
Core [123] Cost Time = 163615 us
Core [124] Cost Time = 166471 us
Core [125] Cost Time = 189044 us
Core [126] Cost Time = 195745 us
Core [127] Cost Time = 78423 us
Total Cost Time = 27339656 us
Change-Id: I888f22120697d42d5a63fda6b4f77d93a0409aab
Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h
index c4c3fc3..87ae7a4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h
@@ -61,9 +61,14 @@ rte_spinlock_lock(rte_spinlock_t *sl);
static inline void
rte_spinlock_lock(rte_spinlock_t *sl)
{
- while (__sync_lock_test_and_set(&sl->locked, 1))
- while(sl->locked)
+ int exp = 0;
+
+ while (!__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&sl->locked, &exp, 1, 0,
+ __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
+ while (__atomic_load_n(&sl->locked, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
rte_pause();
+ exp = 0;
+ }
}
#endif
@@ -80,7 +85,7 @@ rte_spinlock_unlock (rte_spinlock_t *sl);
static inline void
rte_spinlock_unlock (rte_spinlock_t *sl)
{
- __sync_lock_release(&sl->locked);
+ __atomic_store_n(&sl->locked, 0, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
}
#endif
@@ -99,7 +104,10 @@ rte_spinlock_trylock (rte_spinlock_t *sl);
static inline int
rte_spinlock_trylock (rte_spinlock_t *sl)
{
- return __sync_lock_test_and_set(&sl->locked,1) == 0;
+ int exp = 0;
+ return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&sl->locked, &exp, 1,
+ 0, /* disallow spurious failure */
+ __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
}
#endif
@@ -113,7 +121,7 @@ rte_spinlock_trylock (rte_spinlock_t *sl)
*/
static inline int rte_spinlock_is_locked (rte_spinlock_t *sl)
{
- return sl->locked;
+ return __atomic_load_n(&sl->locked, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
}
/**
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-20 10:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct spinlock benchmarking Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] test/spinlock: get timestamp more precisely Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] spinlock: move the implementation to arm specific file Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 12:47 ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 12:55 ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 14:40 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 14:36 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 15:09 ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 15:58 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-20 15:59 ` David Marchand
2018-12-20 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] test/spinlock: get timestamp more precisely Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2018-12-20 17:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 Gavin Hu
2019-01-15 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements gavin hu
2019-01-15 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 gavin hu
2019-01-15 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking gavin hu
2019-01-15 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time gavin hu
2019-01-15 7:54 ` gavin hu [this message]
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] spinlock optimization and test case enhancements gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] eal: fix clang compilation error on x86 gavin hu
2019-01-15 17:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time gavin hu
2019-01-15 10:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins gavin hu
2019-03-08 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] test/spinlock: dealy 1 us to create contention Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] generic spinlock optimization and test case enhancements Gavin Hu
2019-03-11 12:21 ` Nipun Gupta
2019-03-15 12:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 12:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-28 7:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 7:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-08 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] test/spinlock: remove 1us delay for correct benchmarking Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/spinlock: amortize the cost of getting time Gavin Hu
2019-03-08 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] spinlock: reimplement with atomic one-way barrier builtins Gavin Hu
2019-03-12 14:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-14 0:31 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-14 0:31 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-14 2:36 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 2:36 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 14:22 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-14 14:22 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547538849-10996-5-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com \
--to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).