From: Hari Kumar Vemula <hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, reshma.pattan@intel.com,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com, jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com,
Hari Kumar Vemula <hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] eal: fix core number validation
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:13:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547727192-25126-1-git-send-email-hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547216106-13680-1-git-send-email-hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com>
When incorrect core value or range provided,
as part of -l command line option, a crash occurs.
Added valid range checks to fix the crash.
Added ut check for negative core values.
Added unit test case for invalid core number range.
Fixes: d888cb8b9613 ("eal: add core list input format")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Hari Kumar Vemula <hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
--
v6: Changed testcase order
v5: Corrected unit test case for -l option
v4: Used RTE_MAX_LCORE for max core check
v3: Added unit test cases for invalid core number range
v2: Replace strtoul with strtol
Modified log message
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 9 +++-
test/test/test_eal_flags.c | 61 ++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
index 6e3a83b98..14f40c62c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
@@ -592,7 +592,9 @@ eal_parse_corelist(const char *corelist)
if (*corelist == '\0')
return -1;
errno = 0;
- idx = strtoul(corelist, &end, 10);
+ idx = strtol(corelist, &end, 10);
+ if (idx < 0 || idx >= (int)cfg->lcore_count)
+ return -1;
if (errno || end == NULL)
return -1;
while (isblank(*end))
@@ -1103,6 +1105,7 @@ eal_parse_common_option(int opt, const char *optarg,
{
static int b_used;
static int w_used;
+ struct rte_config *cfg = rte_eal_get_configuration();
switch (opt) {
/* blacklist */
@@ -1145,7 +1148,9 @@ eal_parse_common_option(int opt, const char *optarg,
/* corelist */
case 'l':
if (eal_parse_corelist(optarg) < 0) {
- RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "invalid core list\n");
+ RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
+ "invalid core list, please check core numbers are in [0, %u] range\n",
+ cfg->lcore_count-1);
return -1;
}
diff --git a/test/test/test_eal_flags.c b/test/test/test_eal_flags.c
index 2acab9d69..e3a60c7ae 100644
--- a/test/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/test/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <sys/file.h>
#include <limits.h>
+#include <rte_per_lcore.h>
#include <rte_debug.h>
#include <rte_string_fns.h>
@@ -477,40 +478,50 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
"-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
+ /* core number is negative value */
+ const char * const argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "-5" };
+ const char * const argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "-5-7" };
+ /* core number is maximum value */
+ const char * const argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", RTE_STR(RTE_MAX_LCORE) };
+ const char * const argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "1-"RTE_STR(RTE_MAX_LCORE) };
/* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
- const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
/* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
- const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores" };
- const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
/* bad lcores value */
- const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
- const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
- const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
- const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
- const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
- const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
- const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
- const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
- const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv26[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
- const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv27[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
- const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv28[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
/* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
- const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ const char * const argv29[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
"-n", "3", "--lcores",
"0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
@@ -538,31 +549,35 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
|| launch_proc(argv7) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv8) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv9) == 0
- || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
+ || launch_proc(argv10) == 0
+ || launch_proc(argv11) == 0
+ || launch_proc(argv12) == 0
+ || launch_proc(argv13) == 0
+ || launch_proc(argv14) == 0) {
printf("Error - "
"process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
return -1;
}
- if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
+ if (launch_proc(argv15) != 0) {
printf("Error - "
"process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
return -1;
}
/* start --lcores tests */
- if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
- launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
- launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
+ if (launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
- launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
- launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
+ launch_proc(argv22) == 0 || launch_proc(argv23) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv24) == 0 || launch_proc(argv25) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv26) == 0 || launch_proc(argv27) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv28) == 0) {
printf("Error - "
"process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
return -1;
}
- if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
+ if (launch_proc(argv29) != 0) {
printf("Error - "
"process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
return -1;
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <yes>
2018-12-12 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add meson ut enhancements in prog guide Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-20 12:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-23 6:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: add meson ut info " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-23 10:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-01-24 13:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-24 14:15 ` Richardson, Bruce
2019-01-25 6:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-31 14:49 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-02-02 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-03-04 17:05 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-22 22:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-22 22:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-01 11:39 ` Mcnamara, John
2019-05-01 11:39 ` Mcnamara, John
2019-06-06 11:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-07-08 19:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-08 20:18 ` Aaron Conole
2019-07-09 18:57 ` Michael Santana Francisco
2019-07-22 12:39 ` Parthasarathy, JananeeX M
2019-07-22 12:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-22 13:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-07-23 11:34 ` Parthasarathy, JananeeX M
2019-08-07 13:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Agalya Babu RadhaKrishnan
2019-08-07 14:16 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-08-07 15:47 ` Michael Santana Francisco
2019-08-12 12:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] " Jananee Parthasarathy
2020-02-16 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-03 12:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix core number validation Hari kumar Vemula
2019-01-03 13:03 ` David Marchand
2019-01-07 7:05 ` Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-07 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-10 10:11 ` David Marchand
2019-01-11 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-11 15:06 ` David Marchand
2019-01-14 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-14 14:39 ` David Marchand
2019-01-17 12:13 ` Hari Kumar Vemula [this message]
2019-01-17 12:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Bruce Richardson
2019-01-17 12:32 ` David Marchand
2019-01-17 16:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-01-07 13:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: fix create bonded device test failure Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-07 18:44 ` Chas Williams
2019-01-08 10:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-08 11:14 ` [dpdk-dev] " Vemula, Hari KumarX
2019-01-15 17:37 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-01-28 7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-01-31 23:40 ` Chas Williams
2019-02-05 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Hari Kumar Vemula
2019-02-07 13:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547727192-25126-1-git-send-email-hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com \
--to=hari.kumarx.vemula@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).