From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950A1150; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:43:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u4so5718856wrp.3; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:43:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=SKNxHSwmw+NJVjPKdSwyKfSHmcH0w4WP5c0tFe31fdE=; b=rYzgxWG2qU+wp5OJhlmQkL2Ega3ZQsEmgoV+AvAKI61duFh4YNA5I/7WGyFbK5zU9O S4rsh/iz70SqTm7S8taNAJzGpiVMLW8WQPISwRjz0jJpas4AhHsAgl86poZ6idICvbBt oQxOR4H/L10zJrZ8aZsWzGJsKTvDews15PgzY5H6BbPARub4u7cZDQgUu4yu8ol+m5QJ +SDOKrXzDwFlzJR20D4YfFLOxjFh6h8PYRMnRCtrUC1Wb+lzvRvcXlsHdpUQm8sn6anm 9+E+sMspsjN/DhiwkOGRGI5C5AebZQNMAZa7nntSn5a08PvdL5gGGcZxZOm5fFpwlbA7 b1dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfZZ2anvsLv3qgNHZZr/Dc+RnO006V9z4jWgWkm5BO6qRABOMi0 F2lI0x91KQAHCZ2SMLKfcFECF4Ch X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN672JtPV37cmysks+ZZCNuXWHXVdM0bNNBLZ1p2g9gRYNokIT/MSK8jv01mcZmMLI9p4wy+0A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c612:: with SMTP id n18mr6205363wrg.174.1548323037704; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f419:6f00:8361:8946:ba2b:d556]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm57324431wmk.9.2019.01.24.01.43.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:43:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1548323035.8759.38.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: dpdk stable Cc: dev Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:43:55 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1543508586.5087.45.camel@debian.org> <1544467138.7111.12.camel@debian.org> <1544697343.7111.19.camel@debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 16.11.9 (LTS) patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:43:58 -0000 On Sat, 2018-12-22 at 11:15 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018, 11:35 Luca Boccassi =20 > > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 18:38 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 16:23 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > >=20 > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.9. > > > > Please > > > > help review and test. The planned date for the final release is > > > > December the 10th. > > > > Before that, please shout if anyone has objections with these > > > > patches being applied. > > > >=20 > > > > Also for the companies committed to running regression tests, > > > > please run the tests and report any issue before the release > > > > date > > > > by > > > > replying to this email. > > > >=20 > > > > This will be the last 16.11 point release. As with all good > > > > things, > > > > it > > > > must come to an end! > > > >=20 > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > >=20 > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id= =3Dv16.11.9-rc1 > > > >=20 > > > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks. > > > >=20 > > > > Luca Boccassi > > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > Unfortunately due to the conference and other commitments it was > > > not > > > possible to have the test results of 16.11.9-rc1 yet, so the > > > final > > > release will have to be postponed. > > > Tentative date is a week from now, on December the 17th. > > >=20 > > > Apologies if this delay causes any issue. > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > For the same reasons, unfortunately we have to delay the 16.11.9 > > release further. The tentative release date is now Friday the 21st. > >=20 > > Apologies if this delay causes any issue. > >=20 > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Luca Boccassi > >=20 >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Unfortunately test results are yet not ready, so I have to postpone > again. > I will send a further update when a tentative date becomes clearer. >=20 > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi Hi, Due to conferences, holidays and other higher priority deliverables the regression tests on 16.11.9 has still to be ran. The newest estimate is by the end of February - with the alternative being releasing now without the testing. During the release meeting we agreed that, unless there are objections and urgent requirements to have 16.11.9 release in January, we will wait for the regressions and postpone to end of February. Please let us know if there are any objections. Again, apologies for this delay. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi