From: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, gavin hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>,
thomas@monjalon.net, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com,
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, i.maximets@samsung.com,
chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] ring: enforce reading the tail before reading ring slots
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:58:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552409933-45684-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552409933-45684-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1551841661-42892-1-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com>
From: gavin hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
In weak memory models, like arm64, reading the prod.tail may get
reordered after reading the ring slots, which corrupts the ring and
stale data is observed.
This issue was reported by NXP on 8-A72 DPAA2 board. The problem is most
likely caused by missing the acquire semantics when reading
prod.tail (in SC dequeue) which makes it possible to read a
stale value from the ring slots.
For MP (and MC) case, rte_atomic32_cmpset() already provides the required
ordering. For SP case, the control depependency between if-statement(which
depends on the read of r->cons.tail) and the later stores to the ring slots
make RMB unnecessary. About the control dependency, read more at:
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/ppc-supplemental/test7.pdf
This patch is adding the required read barrier to prevent reading the ring
slots get reordered before reading prod.tail for SC case.
Fixes: c9fb3c62896f ("ring: move code in a new header file")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: gavin hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
Tested-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>
---
lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
index ea7dbe5..953cdbb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
@@ -158,11 +158,14 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sc,
return 0;
*new_head = *old_head + n;
- if (is_sc)
- r->cons.head = *new_head, success = 1;
- else
+ if (is_sc) {
+ r->cons.head = *new_head;
+ rte_smp_rmb();
+ success = 1;
+ } else {
success = rte_atomic32_cmpset(&r->cons.head, *old_head,
*new_head);
+ }
} while (unlikely(success == 0));
return n;
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 3:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] ring: enforce reading the tails before ring operations gavin hu
[not found] ` <CGME20190306114906eucas1p19c2572b1fe777e1eb0ca96d2e47295bd@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-03-06 11:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [v1] " Ilya Maximets
2019-03-07 6:50 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-07 6:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " gavin hu
2019-03-07 8:52 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-03-07 9:27 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-07 9:48 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-03-07 10:44 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-07 11:17 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-08 3:21 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-08 5:27 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-08 16:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-10 20:47 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-11 13:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-08 4:23 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-08 5:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-08 12:13 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-08 15:05 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-08 15:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-08 23:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-08 23:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-09 10:28 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 16:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/1] ring: enforce reading the tail before reading ring slots Gavin Hu
2019-03-12 16:58 ` Gavin Hu [this message]
2019-03-13 8:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] " Nipun Gupta
2019-03-15 13:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 13:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-28 0:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 0:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552409933-45684-2-git-send-email-gavin.hu@arm.com \
--to=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@nxp.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).