DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com
Cc: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test/ipsec: fix test initialisation
Date: Thu,  4 Apr 2019 15:51:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1554389511-6355-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553262462-28370-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>

Fix xform initialisation.
Fix testsuite_setup.
Remove unused variables.

Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")

Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
---
Changes in v3:
drop changes to logic around rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst()

 app/test/test_ipsec.c | 34 +++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
index 80a2d25..29fab92 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ struct ipsec_unitest_params {
 	struct rte_mbuf *obuf[BURST_SIZE], *ibuf[BURST_SIZE],
 		*testbuf[BURST_SIZE];
 
-	uint8_t *digest;
 	uint16_t pkt_index;
 };
 
@@ -111,8 +110,6 @@ static struct ipsec_testsuite_params testsuite_params = { NULL };
 static struct ipsec_unitest_params unittest_params;
 static struct user_params uparams;
 
-static uint8_t global_key[128] = { 0 };
-
 struct supported_cipher_algo {
 	const char *keyword;
 	enum rte_crypto_cipher_algorithm algo;
@@ -215,30 +212,26 @@ fill_crypto_xform(struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params,
 	const struct supported_auth_algo *auth_algo,
 	const struct supported_cipher_algo *cipher_algo)
 {
-	ut_params->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
-	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
-	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.key.data = global_key;
-	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.key.length = auth_algo->key_len;
-	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.digest_length = auth_algo->digest_len;
-	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
-
 	ut_params->cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
 	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.algo = cipher_algo->algo;
-	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.key.data = global_key;
-	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.key.length = cipher_algo->key_len;
-	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
-	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
-	ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = cipher_algo->iv_len;
+	ut_params->auth_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
+	ut_params->auth_xform.auth.algo = auth_algo->algo;
 
 	if (ut_params->ipsec_xform.direction ==
 			RTE_SECURITY_IPSEC_SA_DIR_INGRESS) {
-		ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->auth_xform;
-		ut_params->auth_xform.next = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
+		ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+			RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT;
+		ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_VERIFY;
 		ut_params->cipher_xform.next = NULL;
+		ut_params->auth_xform.next = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
+		ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->auth_xform;
 	} else {
-		ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
-		ut_params->cipher_xform.next = &ut_params->auth_xform;
+		ut_params->cipher_xform.cipher.op =
+			RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
+		ut_params->auth_xform.auth.op = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_OP_GENERATE;
 		ut_params->auth_xform.next = NULL;
+		ut_params->cipher_xform.next = &ut_params->auth_xform;
+		ut_params->crypto_xforms = &ut_params->cipher_xform;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -287,9 +280,12 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
 	int rc;
 
 	memset(ts_params, 0, sizeof(*ts_params));
+	memset(ut_params, 0, sizeof(*ut_params));
+	memset(&uparams, 0, sizeof(struct user_params));
 
 	uparams.auth = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
 	uparams.cipher = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
+	uparams.aead = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_NOT_SPECIFIED;
 	strcpy(uparams.auth_algo, "null");
 	strcpy(uparams.cipher_algo, "null");
 
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-20 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/ipsec: " Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-20 12:14 ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 13:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 13:47   ` Bernard Iremonger
2019-03-22 14:20   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-03-22 14:20     ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-04 13:54     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-04 13:54       ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-04-04 14:51   ` Bernard Iremonger [this message]
2019-04-04 14:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test/ipsec: " Bernard Iremonger
2019-04-05 11:12     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-05 11:12       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-16 14:58       ` Akhil Goyal
2019-04-16 14:58         ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1554389511-6355-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).