From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, stephen@networkplumber.org,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com,
stable@dpdk.org, Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/hash: use existing lcore API
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 17:06:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1558537617-27813-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557907020-1548-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
Prefer the existing apis rather than direct access the configuration
structure.
test_hash_multi_add_lookup() currently starts n readers and N writers
using rte_eal_remote_launch().
It then waits for the N writers to complete with a custom
multi_writer_done[] array to synchronise over.
Jump on the occasion to use rte_eal_wait_lcore() so that the code is
more straightforward:
- we start n readers with rte_eal_remote_launch(),
- we start N writers with rte_eal_remote_launch(),
- we wait for N writers to join with rte_eal_wait_lcore(),
- we wait for n readers to join with rte_eal_wait_lcore(),
Fixes: c7eb0972e74b ("test/hash: add lock-free r/w concurrency")
Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
---
Changelog since v1:
- fixed test hang in test_hash_multi_add_lookup() reported by Wang, Yipeng
diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
index 4ab4c8e..343a338 100644
--- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ struct {
static rte_atomic64_t greads;
static volatile uint8_t writer_done;
-static volatile uint8_t multi_writer_done[4];
uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
@@ -690,7 +689,6 @@ struct {
for (i = offset; i < offset + tbl_rwc_test_param.single_insert; i++)
rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h,
tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i);
- multi_writer_done[pos_core] = 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -738,10 +736,9 @@ struct {
rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader,
(void *)(uintptr_t)read_type,
enabled_core_ids[i]);
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -758,6 +755,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -808,12 +806,11 @@ struct {
enabled_core_ids[i]);
ret = write_keys(write_type);
writer_done = 1;
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -830,6 +827,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -884,12 +882,11 @@ struct {
write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT;
ret = write_keys(write_type);
writer_done = 1;
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -906,6 +903,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -960,12 +958,11 @@ struct {
write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT;
ret = write_keys(write_type);
writer_done = 1;
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -982,6 +979,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -1035,12 +1033,11 @@ struct {
write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT;
ret = write_keys(write_type);
writer_done = 1;
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1056,6 +1053,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -1108,8 +1106,6 @@ struct {
rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
writer_done = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
- multi_writer_done[i] = 0;
write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT;
if (write_keys(write_type) < 0)
goto err;
@@ -1133,15 +1129,15 @@ struct {
}
/* Wait for writers to complete */
- for (i = 0; i < rwc_core_cnt[m]; i++)
- while
- (multi_writer_done[i] == 0);
- writer_done = 1;
+ for (i = rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1;
+ i <= rwc_core_cnt[m] + rwc_core_cnt[n];
+ i++)
+ rte_eal_wait_lcore(i);
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ writer_done = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1160,6 +1156,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
@@ -1222,10 +1219,9 @@ struct {
}
}
writer_done = 1;
- rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
- if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
+ if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
goto err;
unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup =
@@ -1242,6 +1238,7 @@ struct {
return 0;
err:
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h);
return -1;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 7:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:56 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: " David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:57 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 12:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 12:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 20:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-15 20:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-15 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/hash: " Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 12:14 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-22 0:16 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-05-22 12:40 ` David Marchand
2019-05-22 15:06 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-05-22 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/rcu: " David Marchand
2019-05-23 14:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-29 22:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-22 16:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/hash: " Dharmik Thakkar
2019-05-22 17:17 ` David Marchand
2019-05-22 19:37 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-05-27 10:15 ` David Marchand
2019-05-28 14:15 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-05-23 12:48 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1558537617-27813-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).