* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning @ 2019-06-14 16:54 Phil Yang 2019-06-14 19:49 ` Eads, Gage 2019-06-17 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Phil Yang @ 2019-06-14 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: nd, gage.eads, honnappa.nagarahalli, gavin.hu, phil.yang clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between pointers to integer types with different sign. Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> --- lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h index a316e9a..e3b9eff 100644 --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, return NULL; #else struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head; - uint64_t len; + int64_t len; int success; /* Reserve num elements, if available */ -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning 2019-06-14 16:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning Phil Yang @ 2019-06-14 19:49 ` Eads, Gage 2019-06-17 7:49 ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) 2019-06-17 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eads, Gage @ 2019-06-14 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Yang, dev; +Cc: nd, honnappa.nagarahalli, gavin.hu > clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when > passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between > pointers to integer types with different sign. > > Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > > --- > lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > index a316e9a..e3b9eff 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, > return NULL; > #else > struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head; > - uint64_t len; > + int64_t len; This works, but I'd prefer to keep 'len' unsigned. How about changing the definition of 'len' in struct rte_stack_lf_list to uint64_t, and in rte_stack_lf_generic.h casting it to rte_atomic64_t* when its address is passed to the rte_atomic64_...() functions? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning 2019-06-14 19:49 ` Eads, Gage @ 2019-06-17 7:49 ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) @ 2019-06-17 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eads, Gage, dev Cc: nd, Honnappa Nagarahalli, Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China), nd > -----Original Message----- > From: Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 3:50 AM > To: Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) <Phil.Yang@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) > <Gavin.Hu@arm.com> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning > > > clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when > > passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between > > pointers to integer types with different sign. > > > > Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > > > > --- > > lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > index a316e9a..e3b9eff 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list > *list, > > return NULL; > > #else > > struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head; > > - uint64_t len; > > + int64_t len; > > This works, but I'd prefer to keep 'len' unsigned. How about changing the > definition of 'len' in struct rte_stack_lf_list to uint64_t, and in > rte_stack_lf_generic.h casting it to rte_atomic64_t* when its address is > passed to the rte_atomic64_...() functions? It is better I think. I have upstreamed the v2, please review it. Thanks, Phil ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning 2019-06-14 16:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning Phil Yang 2019-06-14 19:49 ` Eads, Gage @ 2019-06-17 7:41 ` Phil Yang 2019-06-18 15:43 ` Eads, Gage 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Phil Yang @ 2019-06-17 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: nd, gage.eads, honnappa.nagarahalli, gavin.hu, phil.yang clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between pointers to integer types with different sign. Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") Suggested-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> --- lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h | 2 +- lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h | 8 ++++---- lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h | 7 ++++--- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h index fe048f0..93c360c 100644 --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct rte_stack_lf_list { /** List head */ struct rte_stack_lf_head head __rte_aligned(16); /** List len */ - rte_atomic64_t len; + uint64_t len; }; /* Structure containing two lock-free LIFO lists: the stack itself and a list diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h index a316e9a..3d677ae 100644 --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_c11.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_count(struct rte_stack *s) * elements. If the mempool is near-empty to the point that this is a * concern, the user should consider increasing the mempool size. */ - return (unsigned int)__atomic_load_n(&s->stack_lf.used.len.cnt, + return (unsigned int)__atomic_load_n(&s->stack_lf.used.len, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); } @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_push_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, /* Ensure the stack modifications are not reordered with respect * to the LIFO len update. */ - __atomic_add_fetch(&list->len.cnt, num, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + __atomic_add_fetch(&list->len, num, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); #endif } @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, int success; /* Reserve num elements, if available */ - len = __atomic_load_n(&list->len.cnt, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); + len = __atomic_load_n(&list->len, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); while (1) { /* Does the list contain enough elements? */ @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, return NULL; /* len is updated on failure */ - if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&list->len.cnt, + if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&list->len, &len, len - num, 0, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)) diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h index 1191406..3182151 100644 --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_lf_generic.h @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ __rte_stack_lf_count(struct rte_stack *s) * elements. If the mempool is near-empty to the point that this is a * concern, the user should consider increasing the mempool size. */ - return (unsigned int)rte_atomic64_read(&s->stack_lf.used.len); + return (unsigned int)rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *) + &s->stack_lf.used.len); } static __rte_always_inline void @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_push_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); } while (success == 0); - rte_atomic64_add(&list->len, num); + rte_atomic64_add((rte_atomic64_t *)&list->len, num); #endif } @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ __rte_stack_lf_pop_elems(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list, /* Reserve num elements, if available */ while (1) { - uint64_t len = rte_atomic64_read(&list->len); + uint64_t len = rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)&list->len); /* Does the list contain enough elements? */ if (unlikely(len < num)) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning 2019-06-17 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang @ 2019-06-18 15:43 ` Eads, Gage 2019-06-27 16:04 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eads, Gage @ 2019-06-18 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Yang, dev; +Cc: nd, honnappa.nagarahalli, gavin.hu > clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when > passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between > pointers to integer types with different sign. > > Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") > > Suggested-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Acked-By: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> Thanks, Gage ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning 2019-06-18 15:43 ` Eads, Gage @ 2019-06-27 16:04 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-06-27 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Yang; +Cc: dev, Eads, Gage, nd, honnappa.nagarahalli, gavin.hu Title changed to "stack: fix sign of list length" (it does not belong to EAL) 18/06/2019 17:43, Eads, Gage: > > clang raise 'pointer-sign' warnings in __atomic_compare_exchange when > > passing 'uint64_t *' to parameter of type 'int64_t *' converts between > > pointers to integer types with different sign. > > > > Fixes: 7e6e609939a8 ("stack: add C11 atomic implementation") Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Suggested-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> > > Acked-By: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-27 16:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-06-14 16:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/stack: fix 'pointer-sign' warning Phil Yang 2019-06-14 19:49 ` Eads, Gage 2019-06-17 7:49 ` Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) 2019-06-17 7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang 2019-06-18 15:43 ` Eads, Gage 2019-06-27 16:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).