DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: john.mcnamara@intel.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
	ferruh.yigit@intel.com, marko.kovacevic@intel.co,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] doc: alias to experimental tag for stable apis
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2020 15:43:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1580917421-2639-1-git-send-email-mdr@ashroe.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1580915872-1686-1-git-send-email-mdr@ashroe.eu>

When a maintainer is promoting an API to become part of the next major ABI
version by removing the experimental tag, possibly a few releases in
advance of the declaration of the next ABI version. The maintainer may
choose to offer an alias to the experimental tag, as removing the tag
before the declaration of the next major ABI version, would cause an ABI
breakage for applications using the API.

Signed-off-by: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/abi_policy.rst | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/abi_policy.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/abi_policy.rst
index 05ca959..9a4a102 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/abi_policy.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/abi_policy.rst
@@ -159,6 +159,11 @@ The requirements for changing the ABI are:
      ``experimental``, as described in the section on :ref:`Experimental APIs
      and Libraries <experimental_apis>`.
 
+   - In situations where an ``experimental`` API has been stable for some time.
+     When promoting the API to become part of the next ABI version, the
+     maintainer may choose to provide an alias to the ``experimental`` tag, so
+     as not to break consuming applications.
+
 #. If a newly proposed API functionally replaces an existing one, when the new
    API becomes non-experimental, then the old one is marked with
    ``__rte_deprecated``.
@@ -317,6 +322,11 @@ not required. Though, an API should remain in experimental state for at least
 one release. Thereafter, the normal process of posting patch for review to
 mailing list can be followed.
 
+After the experimental tag has been formally removed, a tree/sub-tree maintainer
+may choose to offer an alias to the experimental tag so as not to break
+applications using the API. This alias can then be dropped at the declaration of
+next major ABI version.
+
 Libraries
 ~~~~~~~~~
 
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-05 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05 15:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ray Kinsella
2020-02-05 15:43 ` Ray Kinsella [this message]
2020-02-18 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ray Kinsella
2020-02-21 17:11   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-25 14:22   ` Kevin Traynor
2020-02-25 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Neil Horman
2020-02-25 17:57   ` David Marchand
2020-05-14 13:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Ray Kinsella
2020-05-14 16:31   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1580917421-2639-1-git-send-email-mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --to=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.co \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).