From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/sfc: generalise the flow specification structure
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:47:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1583405273-14176-4-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1583405273-14176-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Add the concept of a flow specification type.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.h | 25 ++++++-
2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
index 0826032e0..9be1f9ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "sfc_dp_rx.h"
/*
- * At now flow API is implemented in such a manner that each
- * flow rule is converted to one or more hardware filters.
+ * Currently, filter-based (VNIC) flow API is implemented in such a manner
+ * that each flow rule is converted to one or more hardware filters.
* All elements of flow rule (attributes, pattern items, actions)
* correspond to one or more fields in the efx_filter_spec_s structure
* that is responsible for the hardware filter.
@@ -1093,6 +1093,9 @@ sfc_flow_parse_attr(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
struct rte_flow *flow,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
+
if (attr == NULL) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR, NULL,
@@ -1130,8 +1133,9 @@ sfc_flow_parse_attr(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
return -rte_errno;
}
- flow->spec.template.efs_flags |= EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX;
- flow->spec.template.efs_rss_context = EFX_RSS_CONTEXT_DEFAULT;
+ spec->type = SFC_FLOW_SPEC_FILTER;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_flags |= EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_rss_context = EFX_RSS_CONTEXT_DEFAULT;
return 0;
}
@@ -1158,6 +1162,8 @@ sfc_flow_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
unsigned int prev_layer = SFC_FLOW_ITEM_ANY_LAYER;
boolean_t is_ifrm = B_FALSE;
const struct sfc_flow_item *item;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
if (pattern == NULL) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
@@ -1222,7 +1228,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
break;
}
- rc = item->parse(pattern, &flow->spec.template, error);
+ rc = item->parse(pattern, &spec_filter->template, error);
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
@@ -1238,13 +1244,15 @@ sfc_flow_parse_queue(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
const struct rte_flow_action_queue *queue,
struct rte_flow *flow)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
struct sfc_rxq *rxq;
if (queue->index >= sfc_sa2shared(sa)->rxq_count)
return -EINVAL;
rxq = &sa->rxq_ctrl[queue->index];
- flow->spec.template.efs_dmaq_id = (uint16_t)rxq->hw_index;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_dmaq_id = (uint16_t)rxq->hw_index;
return 0;
}
@@ -1262,7 +1270,9 @@ sfc_flow_parse_rss(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int rxq_hw_index_max;
efx_rx_hash_type_t efx_hash_types;
const uint8_t *rss_key;
- struct sfc_flow_rss *sfc_rss_conf = &flow->spec.rss_conf;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
+ struct sfc_flow_rss *sfc_rss_conf = &spec_filter->rss_conf;
unsigned int i;
if (action_rss->queue_num == 0)
@@ -1306,7 +1316,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_rss(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
*/
if (action_rss->queue_num == 1 && action_rss->types == 0 &&
action_rss->key_len == 0) {
- flow->spec.template.efs_dmaq_id = rxq_hw_index_min;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_dmaq_id = rxq_hw_index_min;
return 0;
}
@@ -1334,7 +1344,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_rss(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
rss_key = rss->key;
}
- flow->spec.rss = B_TRUE;
+ spec_filter->rss = B_TRUE;
sfc_rss_conf->rxq_hw_index_min = rxq_hw_index_min;
sfc_rss_conf->rxq_hw_index_max = rxq_hw_index_max;
@@ -1356,13 +1366,14 @@ static int
sfc_flow_spec_flush(struct sfc_adapter *sa, struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
unsigned int filters_count)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
unsigned int i;
int ret = 0;
for (i = 0; i < filters_count; i++) {
int rc;
- rc = efx_filter_remove(sa->nic, &spec->filters[i]);
+ rc = efx_filter_remove(sa->nic, &spec_filter->filters[i]);
if (ret == 0 && rc != 0) {
sfc_err(sa, "failed to remove filter specification "
"(rc = %d)", rc);
@@ -1376,11 +1387,12 @@ sfc_flow_spec_flush(struct sfc_adapter *sa, struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
static int
sfc_flow_spec_insert(struct sfc_adapter *sa, struct sfc_flow_spec *spec)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
unsigned int i;
int rc = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
- rc = efx_filter_insert(sa->nic, &spec->filters[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
+ rc = efx_filter_insert(sa->nic, &spec_filter->filters[i]);
if (rc != 0) {
sfc_flow_spec_flush(sa, spec, i);
break;
@@ -1393,7 +1405,9 @@ sfc_flow_spec_insert(struct sfc_adapter *sa, struct sfc_flow_spec *spec)
static int
sfc_flow_spec_remove(struct sfc_adapter *sa, struct sfc_flow_spec *spec)
{
- return sfc_flow_spec_flush(sa, spec, spec->count);
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
+
+ return sfc_flow_spec_flush(sa, spec, spec_filter->count);
}
static int
@@ -1402,12 +1416,13 @@ sfc_flow_filter_insert(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
{
struct sfc_adapter_shared * const sas = sfc_sa2shared(sa);
struct sfc_rss *rss = &sas->rss;
- struct sfc_flow_rss *flow_rss = &flow->spec.rss_conf;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &flow->spec.filter;
+ struct sfc_flow_rss *flow_rss = &spec_filter->rss_conf;
uint32_t efs_rss_context = EFX_RSS_CONTEXT_DEFAULT;
unsigned int i;
int rc = 0;
- if (flow->spec.rss) {
+ if (spec_filter->rss) {
unsigned int rss_spread = MIN(flow_rss->rxq_hw_index_max -
flow_rss->rxq_hw_index_min + 1,
EFX_MAXRSS);
@@ -1437,8 +1452,8 @@ sfc_flow_filter_insert(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
* RSS behaviour is consistent between them, set the same
* RSS context value everywhere.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < flow->spec.count; i++) {
- efx_filter_spec_t *spec = &flow->spec.filters[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
+ efx_filter_spec_t *spec = &spec_filter->filters[i];
spec->efs_rss_context = efs_rss_context;
spec->efs_dmaq_id = flow_rss->rxq_hw_index_min;
@@ -1450,7 +1465,7 @@ sfc_flow_filter_insert(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
if (rc != 0)
goto fail_filter_insert;
- if (flow->spec.rss) {
+ if (spec_filter->rss) {
/*
* Scale table is set after filter insertion because
* the table entries are relative to the base RxQ ID
@@ -1485,19 +1500,20 @@ static int
sfc_flow_filter_remove(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
struct rte_flow *flow)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &flow->spec.filter;
int rc = 0;
rc = sfc_flow_spec_remove(sa, &flow->spec);
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
- if (flow->spec.rss) {
+ if (spec_filter->rss) {
/*
* All specifications for a given flow rule have the same RSS
* context, so that RSS context value is taken from the first
* filter specification
*/
- efx_filter_spec_t *spec = &flow->spec.filters[0];
+ efx_filter_spec_t *spec = &spec_filter->filters[0];
rc = efx_rx_scale_context_free(sa->nic, spec->efs_rss_context);
}
@@ -1510,13 +1526,15 @@ sfc_flow_parse_mark(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
const struct rte_flow_action_mark *mark,
struct rte_flow *flow)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(sa->nic);
if (mark == NULL || mark->id > encp->enc_filter_action_mark_max)
return EINVAL;
- flow->spec.template.efs_flags |= EFX_FILTER_FLAG_ACTION_MARK;
- flow->spec.template.efs_mark = mark->id;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_flags |= EFX_FILTER_FLAG_ACTION_MARK;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_mark = mark->id;
return 0;
}
@@ -1528,6 +1546,8 @@ sfc_flow_parse_actions(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
int rc;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
const unsigned int dp_rx_features = sa->priv.dp_rx->features;
uint32_t actions_set = 0;
const uint32_t fate_actions_mask = (1UL << RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE) |
@@ -1589,7 +1609,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_actions(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
if ((actions_set & fate_actions_mask) != 0)
goto fail_fate_actions;
- flow->spec.template.efs_dmaq_id =
+ spec_filter->template.efs_dmaq_id =
EFX_FILTER_SPEC_RX_DMAQ_ID_DROP;
break;
@@ -1606,7 +1626,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_actions(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
return -rte_errno;
}
- flow->spec.template.efs_flags |=
+ spec_filter->template.efs_flags |=
EFX_FILTER_FLAG_ACTION_FLAG;
break;
@@ -1645,7 +1665,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_actions(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
/* When fate is unknown, drop traffic. */
if ((actions_set & fate_actions_mask) == 0) {
- flow->spec.template.efs_dmaq_id =
+ spec_filter->template.efs_dmaq_id =
EFX_FILTER_SPEC_RX_DMAQ_ID_DROP;
}
@@ -1682,12 +1702,13 @@ sfc_flow_set_unknown_dst_flags(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
unsigned int i;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
static const efx_filter_match_flags_t vals[] = {
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_UNKNOWN_UCAST_DST,
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_UNKNOWN_MCAST_DST
};
- if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec->count) {
+ if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec_filter->count) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
"Number of specifications is incorrect while copying "
@@ -1695,9 +1716,9 @@ sfc_flow_set_unknown_dst_flags(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
return -rte_errno;
}
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
/* The check above ensures that divisor can't be zero here */
- spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
vals[i / filters_count_for_one_val];
}
@@ -1756,11 +1777,12 @@ sfc_flow_set_ethertypes(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
unsigned int i;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
static const uint16_t vals[] = {
EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4, EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6
};
- if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec->count) {
+ if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec_filter->count) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
"Number of specifications is incorrect "
@@ -1768,15 +1790,15 @@ sfc_flow_set_ethertypes(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
return -rte_errno;
}
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
- spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE;
/*
* The check above ensures that
* filters_count_for_one_val is not 0
*/
- spec->filters[i].efs_ether_type =
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_ether_type =
vals[i / filters_count_for_one_val];
}
@@ -1800,9 +1822,10 @@ sfc_flow_set_outer_vid_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
unsigned int filters_count_for_one_val,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
unsigned int i;
- if (filters_count_for_one_val != spec->count) {
+ if (filters_count_for_one_val != spec_filter->count) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
"Number of specifications is incorrect "
@@ -1810,11 +1833,11 @@ sfc_flow_set_outer_vid_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
return -rte_errno;
}
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
- spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_OUTER_VID;
- spec->filters[i].efs_outer_vid = 0;
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_outer_vid = 0;
}
return 0;
@@ -1839,12 +1862,13 @@ sfc_flow_set_ifrm_unknown_dst_flags(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
unsigned int i;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
static const efx_filter_match_flags_t vals[] = {
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_IFRM_UNKNOWN_UCAST_DST,
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_IFRM_UNKNOWN_MCAST_DST
};
- if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec->count) {
+ if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec_filter->count) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
"Number of specifications is incorrect while copying "
@@ -1852,9 +1876,9 @@ sfc_flow_set_ifrm_unknown_dst_flags(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
return -rte_errno;
}
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
/* The check above ensures that divisor can't be zero here */
- spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
+ spec_filter->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
vals[i / filters_count_for_one_val];
}
@@ -1998,6 +2022,7 @@ sfc_flow_spec_add_match_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
unsigned int new_filters_count;
unsigned int filters_count_for_one_val;
const struct sfc_flow_copy_flag *copy_flag;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
int rc;
copy_flag = sfc_flow_get_copy_flag(flag);
@@ -2008,7 +2033,7 @@ sfc_flow_spec_add_match_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
return -rte_errno;
}
- new_filters_count = spec->count * copy_flag->vals_count;
+ new_filters_count = spec_filter->count * copy_flag->vals_count;
if (new_filters_count > SF_FLOW_SPEC_NB_FILTERS_MAX) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
@@ -2017,11 +2042,13 @@ sfc_flow_spec_add_match_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
}
/* Copy filters specifications */
- for (i = spec->count; i < new_filters_count; i++)
- spec->filters[i] = spec->filters[i - spec->count];
+ for (i = spec_filter->count; i < new_filters_count; i++) {
+ spec_filter->filters[i] =
+ spec_filter->filters[i - spec_filter->count];
+ }
- filters_count_for_one_val = spec->count;
- spec->count = new_filters_count;
+ filters_count_for_one_val = spec_filter->count;
+ spec_filter->count = new_filters_count;
rc = copy_flag->set_vals(spec, filters_count_for_one_val, error);
if (rc != 0)
@@ -2096,6 +2123,7 @@ sfc_flow_spec_filters_complete(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
struct sfc_filter *filter = &sa->filter;
efx_filter_match_flags_t miss_flags;
efx_filter_match_flags_t min_miss_flags = 0;
@@ -2105,12 +2133,12 @@ sfc_flow_spec_filters_complete(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
unsigned int i;
int rc;
- match = spec->template.efs_match_flags;
+ match = spec_filter->template.efs_match_flags;
for (i = 0; i < filter->supported_match_num; i++) {
if ((match & filter->supported_match[i]) == match) {
miss_flags = filter->supported_match[i] & (~match);
multiplier = sfc_flow_check_missing_flags(miss_flags,
- &spec->template, filter);
+ &spec_filter->template, filter);
if (multiplier > 0) {
if (multiplier <= min_multiplier) {
min_multiplier = multiplier;
@@ -2184,16 +2212,17 @@ sfc_flow_is_match_flags_exception(struct sfc_filter *filter,
uint16_t ether_type;
uint8_t ip_proto;
efx_filter_match_flags_t match_flags;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
- for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
- match_flags = spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags;
+ for (i = 0; i < spec_filter->count; i++) {
+ match_flags = spec_filter->filters[i].efs_match_flags;
if (sfc_flow_is_match_with_vids(match_flags,
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE) ||
sfc_flow_is_match_with_vids(match_flags,
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE |
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_LOC_MAC)) {
- ether_type = spec->filters[i].efs_ether_type;
+ ether_type = spec_filter->filters[i].efs_ether_type;
if (filter->supports_ip_proto_or_addr_filter &&
(ether_type == EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 ||
ether_type == EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6))
@@ -2205,7 +2234,7 @@ sfc_flow_is_match_flags_exception(struct sfc_filter *filter,
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE |
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_IP_PROTO |
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_LOC_MAC)) {
- ip_proto = spec->filters[i].efs_ip_proto;
+ ip_proto = spec_filter->filters[i].efs_ip_proto;
if (filter->supports_rem_or_local_port_filter &&
(ip_proto == EFX_IPPROTO_TCP ||
ip_proto == EFX_IPPROTO_UDP))
@@ -2221,13 +2250,15 @@ sfc_flow_validate_match_flags(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
struct rte_flow *flow,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
- efx_filter_spec_t *spec_tmpl = &flow->spec.template;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec = &flow->spec;
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter *spec_filter = &spec->filter;
+ efx_filter_spec_t *spec_tmpl = &spec_filter->template;
efx_filter_match_flags_t match_flags = spec_tmpl->efs_match_flags;
int rc;
/* Initialize the first filter spec with template */
- flow->spec.filters[0] = *spec_tmpl;
- flow->spec.count = 1;
+ spec_filter->filters[0] = *spec_tmpl;
+ spec_filter->count = 1;
if (!sfc_filter_is_match_supported(sa, match_flags)) {
rc = sfc_flow_spec_filters_complete(sa, &flow->spec, error);
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.h
index 14a6b5d14..70f0cdf12 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.h
@@ -35,8 +35,15 @@ struct sfc_flow_rss {
unsigned int rss_tbl[EFX_RSS_TBL_SIZE];
};
-/* Filter specification storage */
-struct sfc_flow_spec {
+/* Flow engines supported by the implementation */
+enum sfc_flow_spec_type {
+ SFC_FLOW_SPEC_FILTER = 0,
+
+ SFC_FLOW_SPEC_NTYPES
+};
+
+/* VNIC-specific flow specification */
+struct sfc_flow_spec_filter {
/* partial specification from flow rule */
efx_filter_spec_t template;
/* fully elaborated hardware filters specifications */
@@ -49,9 +56,21 @@ struct sfc_flow_spec {
struct sfc_flow_rss rss_conf;
};
+/* Flow specification */
+struct sfc_flow_spec {
+ /* Flow specification type (engine-based) */
+ enum sfc_flow_spec_type type;
+
+ RTE_STD_C11
+ union {
+ /* Filter-based (VNIC level flows) specification */
+ struct sfc_flow_spec_filter filter;
+ };
+};
+
/* PMD-specific definition of the opaque type from rte_flow.h */
struct rte_flow {
- struct sfc_flow_spec spec; /* flow spec for hardware filter(s) */
+ struct sfc_flow_spec spec; /* flow specification */
TAILQ_ENTRY(rte_flow) entries; /* flow list entries */
};
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 10:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] net/sfc: prepare rte_flow to have one more backend Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] net/sfc: make flow RSS details VNIC-specific Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/sfc: make the flow list engine-agnostic Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] net/sfc: introduce flow allocation and free path Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] net/sfc: generalise flow parsing Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] net/sfc: generalise flow start and stop path Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-05 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] net/sfc: generalise flow pattern item processing Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-06 16:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] net/sfc: prepare rte_flow to have one more backend Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1583405273-14176-4-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).