DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: declan.doherty@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
	roy.fan.zhang@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:22:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586859760-207446-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586859760-207446-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

Now that capabilities are checked to see if an algorithm
is supported by a device, there is no need to check
for a specific version of a library used in a PMD.

Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h | 25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h b/app/test/test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h
index cff2831..2ed077f 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h
@@ -9,11 +9,6 @@
 #include <intel-ipsec-mb.h>
 #endif
 
-#if !defined(IMB_VERSION_NUM)
-#define IMB_VERSION(a, b, c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
-#define IMB_VERSION_NUM IMB_VERSION(0, 49, 0)
-#endif
-
 static const uint8_t plaintext_hash[] = {
 	"What a lousy earth! He wondered how many people "
 	"were destitute that same night even in his own "
@@ -462,9 +457,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -475,9 +468,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -542,9 +533,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -555,9 +544,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -598,9 +585,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -611,9 +596,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -656,9 +639,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -669,9 +650,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
@@ -714,9 +693,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX
 	},
 	{
@@ -726,9 +703,7 @@ static const struct blockcipher_test_case hash_test_cases[] = {
 		.pmd_mask = BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OPENSSL |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_CCP |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MVSAM |
-#if IMB_VERSION_NUM >= IMB_VERSION(0, 52, 0)
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_MB |
-#endif
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX |
 			    BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_TARGET_PMD_OCTEONTX2
 	},
-- 
2.7.5


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14 10:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 10:22 ` Pablo de Lara [this message]
2020-04-14 10:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-14 17:22     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-14 17:48       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22  9:16         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-22  9:43           ` Akhil Goyal
2020-04-22 10:56             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-15 10:28   ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 10:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 10:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for IMB_VERSION_NUM Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:30     ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-14 17:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-14 17:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:31       ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16 11:15       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-14 17:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-15 10:30       ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-16  9:08     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16  9:08       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:35         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 16:26         ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-16 16:44           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-04-16  9:08       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 15:35         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-16 17:24       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:53           ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-16 17:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/crypto: do not check for internal PMD information Pablo de Lara
2020-04-16 17:53           ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-04-19 21:15         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Crypto test refactoring (first phase) Akhil Goyal
2020-04-15 10:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15  9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15  9:23 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-04-15 10:29 ` Dybkowski, AdamX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1586859760-207446-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).