Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...)

["CHIOSI, MARGARET T" <mc3124@att.com>]

I think it is very important for the first version of governance that we have ARM/SOC vendor/future contributors to be part of TSC.
If based on historical contribution - they will be at a disadvantage.
We need to have the DPDK organization support an API which supports a broader set of chips.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 12:22 PM
To: Bagh Fares
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; dneary@redhat.com; jim.st.leger@intel.com; Pradeep Kathail (pkathail@cisco.com); CHIOSI, MARGARET T
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...)

There were two outcomes.

One was a proposal to move governance under Linux Foundation.

The other was to have a technical steering committee.
It was agreed the TSC would be based on the contributors to the project,
although we didn't come to a conclusion on a voting model.


I would propose that TSC should be elected at regular user summit from nominees;
in a manner similar to LF Technical Advisory Board.