From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B430D5A50 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:28:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049461.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049461.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id tA2HJQfe010614; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:28:21 -0500 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049461.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 1xvqswsry5-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:28:21 -0500 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA2HSKNO000508; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:28:20 -0500 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA2HS9p6000341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:28:14 -0500 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.147]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:28:01 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.198]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.147]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:28:00 -0500 From: "CHIOSI, MARGARET T" To: Stephen Hemminger , Bagh Fares Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...) Thread-Index: AQHRFZL1HTzIf1c0W0WLMklUaOntD56I/AwA Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:28:00 +0000 Message-ID: <158A97FC7D125A40A52F49EE9C463AF522EE478A@MISOUT7MSGUSRDD.ITServices.sbc.com> References: <20151102092153.3b005229@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20151102092153.3b005229@xeon-e3> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.10.103.117] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2015-11-02_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1507310000 definitions=main-1511020305 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Pradeep Kathail \(pkathail@cisco.com\)" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:28:23 -0000 I think it is very important for the first version of governance that we ha= ve ARM/SOC vendor/future contributors to be part of TSC. If based on historical contribution - they will be at a disadvantage. We need to have the DPDK organization support an API which supports a broad= er set of chips. -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]=20 Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 12:22 PM To: Bagh Fares Cc: dev@dpdk.org; dneary@redhat.com; jim.st.leger@intel.com; Pradeep Kathai= l (pkathail@cisco.com); CHIOSI, MARGARET T Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK U= serspace (was Notes from ...) There were two outcomes. One was a proposal to move governance under Linux Foundation. The other was to have a technical steering committee. It was agreed the TSC would be based on the contributors to the project, although we didn't come to a conclusion on a voting model. I would propose that TSC should be elected at regular user summit from nomi= nees; in a manner similar to LF Technical Advisory Board.