From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66F3377C for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 11:42:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z87so55070730wmh.0 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 02:42:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wxK/J5wBMnQItXvB2GcSME1bWRAl5Akw6yMJOrxr3p8=; b=mg75/o2XXQg6oJV0X7tBlJ+uP7iWaTVcewbyruaWt3M2kOh030Pqb28TlJQC2J94s2 g2DA85qDyY1CUnOjL7622K9yKnr/XNtNJVcpyv8IYFuKc5/0fWfUIqIx/YKj5lIiYMne JXzPC69a0ebxx6POCvRH4bolzUszvB8VgSXYcb3UQpLBmLNFYSbffKHe5BFaXs3Sqtnd +ZunCwgksc9Q/9RJQuKihRZQsPsxDOwIbrosnifdEVrnkKGRaihpkxFCtvLfLoDJod8q h8zctJ5zJ/oCCI2Ds1CugBlSLBRLFohnEzo/JnkTBO+cF79ia4Ljr6c1A/veR8SnCI43 Lcgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wxK/J5wBMnQItXvB2GcSME1bWRAl5Akw6yMJOrxr3p8=; b=hmS9lT8Il0x9Ftba/Q80dPzQUIDls2wbebjK7wkhK2s5LReiFFirSS56SRFfCxYOEq ZXfd9WFeVIi7n76NMam0QIa/tLWAzgW4zoeEI/nLCHaQCXN0cPJGw543rxIqhCO/D2SI mV60U/YDF+jP1CuwGIFFMvhHgb0bXcs3dIJB8ng3Xsnk30cFKwUwfsdbMudlQNHHhkHg jeyk0YvWMvfF+os9iN9KHjlvainqrD4+RyuHU4i7EUC8dePjMdiNL7166Klzku7LW/tE SARUcFtfAHY0HXojKBYT6BcI1w9T3Z/KJ7Nxx91MgTqmG+LE8WyJM2GU5Qwr8FoXQc90 nECA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJrwdw9H+9P9IiNVEc4E0+5i/QBpLyhHiuXmHE/BIBZa4lBLGpK7v07OC5o6JaRFMee X-Received: by 10.194.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr2731665wjt.74.1464169333628; Wed, 25 May 2016 02:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o129sm23698326wmb.17.2016.05.25.02.42.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2016 02:42:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Zhihong Wang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:42:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1591071.TKkbpo8ne8@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1462488421-118990-5-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> References: <1462488421-118990-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1462488421-118990-5-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] testpmd: handle all rxqs in rss setup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:42:13 -0000 2016-05-05 18:46, Zhihong Wang: > This patch removes constraints in rxq handling when multiqueue is enabled > to handle all the rxqs. > > Current testpmd forces a dedicated core for each rxq, some rxqs may be > ignored when core number is less than rxq number, and that causes confusion > and inconvenience. I have the feeling that "constraints", "confusion" and "inconvenience" should be more explained. Please give some examples with not enough and too much cores. Thanks