From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: do not include CRC in Tx byte count
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:55:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1605137.dhuUauZInt@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150127113847.3d4d32a0@uryu.home.lan>
Anyone to carefully review this patch?
2015-01-27 11:38, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:11:39 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > 2015-01-22 22:23, stephen@networkplumber.org:
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
> > >
> > > The ixgbe driver was including CRC in the transmit packet byte
> > > count, but not for packets received. This was notice when forwarding and
> > > the number of bytes received was greater than the number of bytes transmitted
> >
> > Tx includes CRC and Rx count is greater, really?
ping
> > > for the same number of packets. Make the driver behave like other
> > > virtual devices and not include CRC in byte count. Use the same queue
> > > counters already computed and used for Rx.
> >
> > Please could you describe the difference between gptc/gotc and qptc/qbtc?
> >
> > Thank you
>
>
> The byte counts for global registers include CRC in the byte count.
> This has been observed by experimentation and validated by QA and documented
> in Intel HW specs.
>
> The original code used queue counts for Rx because the global counters
> include missed packets (which must not be included in the ipacket counts).
> I suspect that is why the original developer used the queue counts, as
> a good side effect the Rx byte count was correct (no CRC). I just extended
> this for Tx.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 6:23 stephen
2015-01-27 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-27 11:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-04 20:55 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
[not found] ` <9265c0d3b03e4f33b7823139be7b3b91@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2015-03-04 23:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-03-23 14:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-23 16:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-24 15:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-04-02 20:20 ` Butler, Siobhan A
2015-03-24 23:54 Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-04-01 7:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-09 23:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <c8d4fd5c400c4beaa4577b8b1069fe04@BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com>
2015-04-01 18:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-07-09 22:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1605137.dhuUauZInt@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shemming@brocade.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).